So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?
Legolas Send a noteboard - 16/08/2010 06:11:43 PM

... those other 120-150 don't count, I don't even know where the hell Burundi or Rand McNally are.
Nice link, it's funnier than the classic one with Jesusland and "Here Be Dragons" because of the personalization for Reagan.
Nice joke, too, but I had to look it up on Wikipedia to get it.

At what point does it become ok to take over a country?
16/08/2010 04:25:09 PM
- 1303 Views
why would we want to make Mexico our problem? *NM*
16/08/2010 04:30:48 PM
- 359 Views
Yeah that's why i don't want us to take over. I think the US is already too big as is *NM*
16/08/2010 04:37:41 PM
- 334 Views
One might argue it already is. The other way around too, though. *NM*
16/08/2010 04:44:19 PM
- 319 Views
I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride.
16/08/2010 04:51:38 PM
- 869 Views
Re: I'm fairly sure that yes, the majority of them have national pride.
16/08/2010 05:11:49 PM
- 709 Views
Actually, make that number 120 to 150. *NM*
16/08/2010 05:14:15 PM
- 334 Views
We don't invade countries we can't locate on the map...
16/08/2010 06:01:43 PM
- 957 Views
So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?
16/08/2010 06:11:43 PM
- 663 Views

Re: So that means there are only five or so countries you can invade, one of them yourself?
16/08/2010 06:30:56 PM
- 890 Views

When they get on your nerves or have something you want, preferably both
16/08/2010 05:04:10 PM
- 832 Views
I agree we should attack Canada instead
16/08/2010 05:19:48 PM
- 828 Views
Yeah, but they don't gouge us for the oil, cost the same as anyone else *NM*
16/08/2010 05:49:38 PM
- 341 Views
I would legalize drugs ten times over before I would annex Mexico.
16/08/2010 05:36:37 PM
- 898 Views
"I would stop doing a bad thing 10 times over before I did a worse thing"? WTF? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:04:48 PM
- 420 Views
Read the original post. He proposes annexing Mexico due to the drug problem.
16/08/2010 06:28:54 PM
- 875 Views
He's just nitpicking on your phrasing in the subject line. I think. *NM*
16/08/2010 06:37:17 PM
- 327 Views
that sounds like a much better immigration solution idea than "let's build a GIGANTIC FENCE!!!" *NM*
16/08/2010 06:33:46 PM
- 343 Views
Work Visas might help, but...
16/08/2010 06:51:11 PM
- 1026 Views
Oh i know it's not a complete solution and i have no problem with a fence
16/08/2010 07:43:26 PM
- 765 Views
Just so long as we're both on the 'multi-front solution' page
16/08/2010 08:35:06 PM
- 679 Views

it's also worth noting that no one is proposing throwing out the Cubans
16/08/2010 08:54:46 PM
- 824 Views

When the US says so. We are the bosses of the World, are we not? *NM*
16/08/2010 08:06:08 PM
- 341 Views
Not even Hitler's Germany? (if he never went to war but just stayed put) Reply to Yuna *NM*
16/08/2010 09:24:41 PM
- 431 Views
If he had never gone to war, that would also have meant no Holocaust... *NM*
16/08/2010 09:28:16 PM
- 335 Views
Really? Why is that? I'm not too terribly familiar with Hitler's reasons for mass genocide *NM*
16/08/2010 09:30:48 PM
- 341 Views
Dachau opened in '33, Nuremburg Laws were '35
16/08/2010 09:36:59 PM
- 762 Views
Ok that's what I was thinking
16/08/2010 09:45:51 PM
- 803 Views
Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating".
16/08/2010 09:52:37 PM
- 804 Views
Re: Uh, yeah, see, there's a difference between "blaming" and "exterminating".
16/08/2010 09:54:29 PM
- 741 Views
I don't know if there's really anything to specifically compare it to...
16/08/2010 10:00:59 PM
- 912 Views
Also, perhaps someone should just invoke the (variation of the) Godwin Law and stop this whole thing
16/08/2010 10:02:23 PM
- 814 Views
Ah,
16/08/2010 10:04:39 PM
- 724 Views
Nah, more like, I know I shouldn't have done this, but I couldn't resist. *NM*
16/08/2010 10:07:35 PM
- 354 Views
Well, you'll note I didn't make that causal relation you attribute to me.
16/08/2010 09:55:39 PM
- 850 Views
The Dachau follow up was bookkeeping
16/08/2010 10:05:35 PM
- 801 Views
I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue.
16/08/2010 10:09:16 PM
- 893 Views
Re: I'm confused, but I'll take that as something I don't have to argue.
16/08/2010 10:19:19 PM
- 774 Views
The US already took half of Mexico, so why not the other half?
16/08/2010 09:57:56 PM
- 849 Views
"Took" is an unfriendly word, we purchased it *NM*
16/08/2010 10:21:58 PM
- 349 Views
yes after a messy political and physical "conflict"
16/08/2010 10:53:22 PM
- 818 Views
There was also the Gasdsen Purchase
17/08/2010 12:30:21 AM
- 771 Views
The Gadsden Purchase was a pittance and an afterthought, as I'm sure you're aware.
18/08/2010 12:36:24 PM
- 679 Views
and why did it belong to Mexico to begin with? *NM*
17/08/2010 01:28:28 AM
- 373 Views
same way
it seems to be the way most people who own the Americas came to own it.
17/08/2010 01:46:49 AM
- 638 Views

my best friend is an illegal and is going back to mexico in a few months
16/08/2010 11:28:11 PM
- 817 Views
every issue is simpler when you don't have faces to represent it for you. *NM*
16/08/2010 11:29:38 PM
- 345 Views
We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 12:58:37 AM
- 659 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 02:39:11 AM
- 731 Views
Re: We should seal our border and peform drone strikes on cartels.
17/08/2010 03:34:59 AM
- 896 Views
I think maybe we've had enough of nation building for a while *NM*
17/08/2010 02:45:22 AM
- 327 Views