Even by non-scientific newspaper standards, the summing up of five arguments for each side was rather sad. It wasn't the fact that he listed arguments for creationism that was sad, as you seem to think. It was the way he just listed five strongly simplified arguments for each side without doing any effort at all to reconcile the contradictions even between arguments on the same side, or without pointing out that the two sides are hardly monolithic.
I can't even believe this.
- 13/09/2009 07:40:02 PM
1296 Views
Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
- 13/09/2009 07:43:15 PM
819 Views
Re: Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
- 13/09/2009 10:28:42 PM
921 Views
That is one amazingly stupid article...
- 13/09/2009 08:04:47 PM
873 Views
The author used the phrase "proven theories." Ergo, their argument is invalid. *NM*
- 14/09/2009 01:11:51 AM
454 Views
seriously. there's no such thing as a truly proven theory
- 14/09/2009 01:52:30 AM
815 Views
Re: definition of "theory"
- 14/09/2009 04:49:13 AM
953 Views
I can't really tell
- 14/09/2009 08:14:14 PM
875 Views
I think you are getting workedup over nothing
- 14/09/2009 09:57:22 PM
1027 Views
That's... not exactly it.
- 14/09/2009 10:33:02 PM
777 Views
not that is exactly it
- 14/09/2009 11:10:52 PM
1030 Views
No, Craig is quite right.
- 14/09/2009 11:21:11 PM
831 Views
No you just happen to wrong with him
- 15/09/2009 01:14:16 AM
836 Views
Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
- 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
1024 Views
- 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
1024 Views
Re: Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
- 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
988 Views
- 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
988 Views
'Fraid not.
- 14/09/2009 11:24:00 PM
835 Views
It's not, it's supposed to be relatively decent - mainstream conservative newspaper. *NM*
- 14/09/2009 11:28:44 PM
445 Views
Re: 'Fraid not.
- 15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM
817 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
913 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
913 Views
completely aside from this argument you guys have here...
- 15/09/2009 05:02:21 AM
887 Views
Interrupter!
- 15/09/2009 06:11:40 AM
813 Views
Re: Interrupter!
- 15/09/2009 06:54:56 AM
915 Views
One brain C4, coming up...
- 15/09/2009 12:00:26 PM
886 Views
The age of the universe is an important point in the creationist argument
- 15/09/2009 05:53:41 PM
889 Views
Exactly. So it was in the wrong column.
- 15/09/2009 07:58:15 PM
870 Views
what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie
- 15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM
899 Views
Um.
- 14/09/2009 11:28:28 PM
956 Views
LOL
- 15/09/2009 09:29:16 PM
914 Views
Really? Because this was a rather atypical debate, honestly.
- 15/09/2009 09:43:13 PM
818 Views
Well, I can pretend if you want me to
- 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
1365 Views
- 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
1365 Views
I happen to find it all extremely interesting
- 15/09/2009 10:23:19 PM
832 Views
There are some places you can go that discuss the creationist ideas
- 15/09/2009 10:58:25 PM
991 Views

*NM*