We realy could use just a "blink... blink" smiley of some sort. Kind of a "I have no idea what is going on in your post" deal. Neither of the "confused" smilies really is serving my purposes, here.


Eh. I didn't really pop into this thread with any intention of doing some sort of in-depth analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the article, or to do a literary analysis. I was just agreeing with others on the shittiness of said article. Apologies for not writing an epic tome detailing all my issues with it.


I think I'm beginning to see where your username comes from. I'm really failing to see any sort of underlying point, or even logic, to this particular response.


That's cool, and all, I guess. Wasn't the article about evolution, though? Maybe I got turned around somewhere.


But the so-called "highlights" were inaccurate, and abridged to the point of uselessness. Ergo, it still failed in the purpose you ascribe to it.


What "knowledge" would establish my bona fides to weigh in on the crappiness of this article, in your opinion? I feel I should tailor my response to your specifications, in order to avoid wasting time.


You should try it sometime. Pointing and laughing can be cathartic!