Active Users:698 Time:27/05/2026 05:08:43 AM
Because Episcopalians don't listen to the Bible much. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 12/05/2011 05:47:03 AM
Or, less flippantly, we don't treat it as the sole arbiter of our faith. You're familiar enough with our theology that I don't need to explain the three-legged stool here. There is a great deal in the Bible that we consciously and conscientiously reject. We also acknowledge that it was written by humans; however justified the misogynistic opinions of a first century ex-Pharisee might have been in the context of his life, they're hardly a sound basis for a church entering the 21st century.

I'm excoriating Joel because he doesn't apply the points he has made to female ordination, which he supports. The points he's raising are valid if you're a Biblical literalist; thankfully, I am not a Biblical literalist. Paul had his hangups too.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

This message last edited by Ghavrel on 12/05/2011 at 05:48:03 AM
Reply to message
Presbyterian Church (USA) passes Amendment 10-A. - 11/05/2011 05:39:29 PM 1537 Views
*NM* - 11/05/2011 06:10:26 PM 379 Views
I am happy to see this. *NM* - 11/05/2011 07:22:59 PM 408 Views
Homosexuals must die! - 11/05/2011 08:25:25 PM 1202 Views
I agree! This sort of behavior can NOT be excused!!! - 11/05/2011 10:38:16 PM 854 Views
Yay!!. - 11/05/2011 10:38:51 PM 1127 Views
Glad to hear it. *NM* - 11/05/2011 10:46:39 PM 461 Views
Well done. *NM* - 11/05/2011 11:07:22 PM 410 Views
What's the language? Did they at least TRY to give a doctrinal justification? - 12/05/2011 02:10:46 AM 1113 Views
Thank you for that rousing argument against married priests. - 12/05/2011 03:36:51 AM 1052 Views
Why ARE you letting women into the priesthood? - 12/05/2011 04:16:50 AM 956 Views
Because Episcopalians don't listen to the Bible much. - 12/05/2011 05:47:03 AM 894 Views
That's just fine as far as I'm concerned - 12/05/2011 02:23:44 PM 934 Views
Yes, I suppose a church could go that route. - 14/05/2011 07:38:02 AM 873 Views
I'm not attempting to impose a dichotomy on the Bible. - 14/05/2011 03:25:30 PM 951 Views
I don't even know what following the Bible in its entirety means. - 14/05/2011 09:09:10 PM 1118 Views
As an exercise, I tried to think of how I would justify allowing homosexuals as clergy. - 14/05/2011 04:19:43 PM 945 Views
Wow. - 20/05/2011 10:15:21 AM 966 Views
Thanks (I'm actually OK with women priests though). - 12/05/2011 07:09:11 AM 1003 Views
It's more a question of interpretational standards. - 12/05/2011 02:29:43 PM 890 Views
Agreed. - 14/05/2011 01:17:45 AM 962 Views
They did so, via negativa. - 12/05/2011 04:22:17 PM 1091 Views
Your church has a constitution?! - 12/05/2011 03:36:41 AM 944 Views
My Church has a congress! *NM* - 12/05/2011 03:37:52 AM 450 Views
Haha no way! *NM* - 12/05/2011 03:46:32 AM 409 Views
We have a General Assembly and a Moderator. - 12/05/2011 04:18:34 PM 1050 Views
I had no idea the US was based on that system. - 12/05/2011 06:22:58 PM 890 Views
It is pretty common practice - 12/05/2011 06:54:02 PM 926 Views
Oh I'm sure it is with newer churches. - 12/05/2011 10:49:11 PM 986 Views
I'm happy to hear this, personally. I also wonder how you reconcile this with the Bible. - 12/05/2011 04:11:31 AM 1121 Views
Every direct reference to homosexuality in the Bible is a reference to rape. - 12/05/2011 04:12:43 PM 945 Views
Every single word that you wrote in your response is complete bullshit. - 12/05/2011 05:50:07 PM 1075 Views
Knock off your eisegesis, try some exegesis - 12/05/2011 07:02:45 PM 991 Views
I'm trying to figure out just what your "gifts" are, because I don't see any. - 12/05/2011 07:30:39 PM 957 Views
Oh, is that how we're playing this, then? - 13/05/2011 06:29:31 PM 969 Views
Re: Oh, is that how we're playing this, then? - 13/05/2011 07:02:35 PM 942 Views
I'm not playing. I'm pointing out some glaring errors on your part. - 13/05/2011 07:25:08 PM 872 Views
Danny will correct me if I'm wrong, but... - 13/05/2011 09:55:14 PM 1065 Views
Danny persistently refuses to say that - 13/05/2011 10:13:55 PM 1010 Views
And with respect to your textual point, once again you're wrong - 12/05/2011 07:44:10 PM 1090 Views
You're a fucking moron. *NM* - 15/05/2011 11:11:08 PM 435 Views
You make a very important but too often overlooked point. - 14/05/2011 01:54:40 AM 1073 Views
??? the bible was harsher on homosexulaity than on rape - 12/05/2011 06:56:43 PM 932 Views
Read Judges. - 12/05/2011 07:17:29 PM 935 Views
Another example... - 12/05/2011 09:19:52 AM 854 Views
That's what people said about churches opposing slavery. - 12/05/2011 04:06:26 PM 927 Views
I rest my case *NM* - 12/05/2011 04:48:32 PM 400 Views
That is a false dichotomy and we both know it. - 14/05/2011 02:07:19 AM 913 Views
If you claim to follow the entire Bible, then you are completely correct. - 12/05/2011 06:04:38 PM 851 Views
On the contrary, this move will take some butts out of the seats. - 12/05/2011 07:16:22 PM 910 Views
We both know that isn't the case - 12/05/2011 07:55:41 PM 1017 Views
Whatever your issue is, get over it. - 13/05/2011 06:17:26 PM 870 Views
You'd be a lot more effective... - 13/05/2011 06:45:31 PM 993 Views
You haven't adequately expressed your theology - 13/05/2011 07:28:54 PM 971 Views
Cool cool. I have a question on a semi-related note, about Protestant Gospels - 12/05/2011 05:33:49 PM 970 Views
Since I haven't gotten around to asking yet... - 13/05/2011 07:14:01 PM 881 Views
Re: Since I haven't gotten around to asking yet... - 15/05/2011 03:18:23 PM 1286 Views

Reply to Message