You didn't answer my Biblical facts that you missed, so you are great at only seeing what agrees with you.
You pretend that your translation is the only way to translate, so you are great at being the universe.
You see what you want to see. That's your call. You can even call me a hypocrite. Good on you.
But while you walk around feeling all superior, you are depending on a simplistic view of Biblical work that means you might actually be incapable of understanding what I am saying. The Bible disagrees with itself. You know that, right? Therefore, in order to have an interpretation that values the whole Bible, you have to get past the concept of Biblical Fact. What can we learn from both Nehemiah and Ruth, despite them being so inconsistent with each other, and written at more or less the same time? The multiple creation stories? The four Gospels? I'd go into further detail, but I have hashed them over and over in talks with Jeordam so many times here and at Wotmania that I doubt other people want to read them again.
We are not ignoring any part of the Bible (though, as I admitted before, I can miss parts occasionally when dashing off a Messageboard reply. Are you gonna talk about my concession on the Paul's saying or just pretend I didn't make it?) rather, we are working with the work as a whole, which is something that no self-avowed "literalist" ever does. They can't, because if they did, then they would have to call one verse "right" and the other verse "wrong".
You pretend that your translation is the only way to translate, so you are great at being the universe.
You see what you want to see. That's your call. You can even call me a hypocrite. Good on you.
But while you walk around feeling all superior, you are depending on a simplistic view of Biblical work that means you might actually be incapable of understanding what I am saying. The Bible disagrees with itself. You know that, right? Therefore, in order to have an interpretation that values the whole Bible, you have to get past the concept of Biblical Fact. What can we learn from both Nehemiah and Ruth, despite them being so inconsistent with each other, and written at more or less the same time? The multiple creation stories? The four Gospels? I'd go into further detail, but I have hashed them over and over in talks with Jeordam so many times here and at Wotmania that I doubt other people want to read them again.
We are not ignoring any part of the Bible (though, as I admitted before, I can miss parts occasionally when dashing off a Messageboard reply. Are you gonna talk about my concession on the Paul's saying or just pretend I didn't make it?) rather, we are working with the work as a whole, which is something that no self-avowed "literalist" ever does. They can't, because if they did, then they would have to call one verse "right" and the other verse "wrong".
Eschew Verbosity
Presbyterian Church (USA) passes Amendment 10-A.
11/05/2011 05:39:29 PM
- 1286 Views
What's the language? Did they at least TRY to give a doctrinal justification?
12/05/2011 02:10:46 AM
- 791 Views
Thank you for that rousing argument against married priests.
12/05/2011 03:36:51 AM
- 779 Views
Why ARE you letting women into the priesthood?
12/05/2011 04:16:50 AM
- 723 Views
Because Episcopalians don't listen to the Bible much.
12/05/2011 05:47:03 AM
- 673 Views
That's just fine as far as I'm concerned
12/05/2011 02:23:44 PM
- 675 Views
Yes, I suppose a church could go that route.
14/05/2011 07:38:02 AM
- 647 Views
I'm not attempting to impose a dichotomy on the Bible.
14/05/2011 03:25:30 PM
- 703 Views
I don't even know what following the Bible in its entirety means.
14/05/2011 09:09:10 PM
- 873 Views
As an exercise, I tried to think of how I would justify allowing homosexuals as clergy.
14/05/2011 04:19:43 PM
- 679 Views
Thanks (I'm actually OK with women priests though).
12/05/2011 07:09:11 AM
- 744 Views
There's ample precedent for female religious leaders, even within the bible.
12/05/2011 06:51:05 AM
- 775 Views
Since when is Moses' society the be-all end all?
12/05/2011 07:12:41 PM
- 651 Views
Since never, which is why I referenced five other eras you completely ignored.
14/05/2011 01:11:30 AM
- 759 Views
They did so, via negativa.
12/05/2011 04:22:17 PM
- 818 Views
Sorry for the delay, particularly since it looks like I'll be spending a fair amount of time here.
14/05/2011 12:31:33 AM
- 620 Views
Your church has a constitution?!
12/05/2011 03:36:41 AM
- 671 Views
My Church has a congress! *NM*
12/05/2011 03:37:52 AM
- 348 Views
Haha no way! *NM*
12/05/2011 03:46:32 AM
- 298 Views
Well, we have one group of laity and one of bishops, so it is only mildy utter chaos. *NM*
12/05/2011 05:51:09 AM
- 322 Views
I'm happy to hear this, personally. I also wonder how you reconcile this with the Bible.
12/05/2011 04:11:31 AM
- 859 Views
Every direct reference to homosexuality in the Bible is a reference to rape.
12/05/2011 04:12:43 PM
- 696 Views
Every single word that you wrote in your response is complete bullshit.
12/05/2011 05:50:07 PM
- 805 Views
Knock off your eisegesis, try some exegesis
12/05/2011 07:02:45 PM
- 750 Views
I'm trying to figure out just what your "gifts" are, because I don't see any.
12/05/2011 07:30:39 PM
- 714 Views
There are cases in which hypocrisy is far better than the alternatives.
12/05/2011 10:04:32 PM
- 789 Views
Hypocrisy is better than, say, setting gays on fire, yes.
12/05/2011 10:10:40 PM
- 754 Views
My statement is that, from a pragmatic point of view, hypocrisy shouldn't be discouraged too much.
13/05/2011 10:05:39 PM
- 751 Views
Oh, is that how we're playing this, then?
13/05/2011 06:29:31 PM
- 705 Views
I'm not playing. I'm pointing out some glaring errors on your part.
13/05/2011 07:25:08 PM
- 636 Views
The Bible says what it says. The problem... people like to tell us just what else it's saying.
13/05/2011 05:31:29 PM
- 655 Views
You don't reconcile... you pick the parts you like and adjust the rest to suit you.
13/05/2011 09:33:54 PM
- 616 Views
Another example...
12/05/2011 09:19:52 AM
- 612 Views
If you claim to follow the entire Bible, then you are completely correct.
12/05/2011 06:04:38 PM
- 589 Views
On the contrary, this move will take some butts out of the seats.
12/05/2011 07:16:22 PM
- 651 Views
We both know that isn't the case
12/05/2011 07:55:41 PM
- 757 Views
Cool cool. I have a question on a semi-related note, about Protestant Gospels
12/05/2011 05:33:49 PM
- 714 Views
No Protestant denomination has added so much as a word to the Bible
12/05/2011 05:58:16 PM
- 589 Views
So, everyone hates Judith, then?
12/05/2011 06:40:11 PM
- 658 Views
The Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Churches accept Judith as part of Scripture.
12/05/2011 07:51:27 PM
- 629 Views
Does the Eastern Orthodox Church also segregate deuterocanonical works like Roman Catholicism does?
14/05/2011 02:19:03 AM
- 933 Views
The Eastern Church bases everything on the Septuagint.
14/05/2011 02:34:41 AM
- 683 Views
That sounds appealing, and makes sense.
14/05/2011 02:44:56 AM
- 700 Views
Oh, I just enjoy calling Protestants "heretics" to remind them not everyone agrees with them.
14/05/2011 03:25:42 AM
- 639 Views
Re: Cool cool. I have a question on a semi-related note, about Protestant Gospels
12/05/2011 08:52:48 PM
- 662 Views
The NIV is terrible. The NASB has the best translation I have found (of the NT, at least).
12/05/2011 10:43:58 PM
- 800 Views
I find this really weird, to be honest
13/05/2011 05:48:28 AM
- 671 Views
Well, it wasn't just Athanasius. But yes, we are lucky in that respect. *NM*
13/05/2011 06:32:48 AM
- 284 Views
Athanasius's list reflected the victory of Pauline Christianity
13/05/2011 02:52:53 PM
- 626 Views
There's a school of thought that says that's a strong vindication of Athanasius.
14/05/2011 02:37:49 AM
- 571 Views