Hey folks, I have a question about natural selection: what is it?
No, this is not another evolution vs. creation post (at least, that's not my intent), nor is it me proclaiming I don't believe in NS.
In fact the type of creationism I favor makes heavy use of natural selection to account for the variety within species or groups of species.
Recently however I've been reading another book and it discussed natural selection in a philosophical way, showing that there are multiple ways to define NS and all of them were unscientific.
I found that rather strange, since obviously we can see that some individuals or some species can live on while others go extinct. Since they are not actively selected by an outside intelligence (like man or God or aliens) it would be oke to say that "nature selects".
Now I will not repeat his arguments here, for that may put you in a frame of mind about how to define NS, rahter I'd like you guys to give me your best shot of defining NS and then I'll see if his arguments are still valid when applied to your definitions
One more thing about what I meant with "scientific", here I mean that it is (a theory or hypothesis that is) falsifiable (Popper).
No, this is not another evolution vs. creation post (at least, that's not my intent), nor is it me proclaiming I don't believe in NS.
In fact the type of creationism I favor makes heavy use of natural selection to account for the variety within species or groups of species.
Recently however I've been reading another book and it discussed natural selection in a philosophical way, showing that there are multiple ways to define NS and all of them were unscientific.
I found that rather strange, since obviously we can see that some individuals or some species can live on while others go extinct. Since they are not actively selected by an outside intelligence (like man or God or aliens) it would be oke to say that "nature selects".
Now I will not repeat his arguments here, for that may put you in a frame of mind about how to define NS, rahter I'd like you guys to give me your best shot of defining NS and then I'll see if his arguments are still valid when applied to your definitions

One more thing about what I meant with "scientific", here I mean that it is (a theory or hypothesis that is) falsifiable (Popper).
Natural selection
06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
- 1120 Views
selection for suitability
06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
- 764 Views
Thanks for your responce
06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
- 877 Views

I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
- 828 Views
Just a question
06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
- 819 Views
Yes it can
06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
- 682 Views
But how?
06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
- 883 Views
Re: Just a question
06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
- 903 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
- 806 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
- 824 Views
Then it is still a tautology
06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
- 836 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
- 938 Views
Maybe...
07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
- 786 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
- 867 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
- 930 Views
As I understand it
06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
- 753 Views
Better...
06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
- 736 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
- 863 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
- 345 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
- 799 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
- 832 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
- 856 Views
The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
- 864 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
- 839 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
- 858 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up?
*NM*
06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
- 356 Views


100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool
*NM*
06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
- 378 Views


Re: Natural selection
07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
- 841 Views
Thanks a lot
07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
- 983 Views
2 things
07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
- 741 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
- 955 Views
Re: 2 things
07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
- 779 Views
My best guess
07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
- 824 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
- 751 Views
Re: My best guess
07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
- 909 Views