Even if you can only measure it after the fact, that doesn't mean it cannot be "predicted or tested."
You can't KNOW, or ACCURATELY predict ANYTHING that has never been tested before, but you can make predictions, do tests, and study the results. This would apply to determining whether a new trait is beneficial for a population of organisms as much as it would to anything else in science.
You can't KNOW, or ACCURATELY predict ANYTHING that has never been tested before, but you can make predictions, do tests, and study the results. This would apply to determining whether a new trait is beneficial for a population of organisms as much as it would to anything else in science.
Natural selection
- 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
1270 Views
selection for suitability
- 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
917 Views
Thanks for your responce 
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
1039 Views
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
1039 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
- 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
989 Views
Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
999 Views
Yes it can
- 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
838 Views
But how?
- 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
1061 Views
Re: Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
1081 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
- 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
984 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
1015 Views
Then it is still a tautology
- 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
1047 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
- 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
1090 Views
Maybe...
- 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
966 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
- 09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
1022 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
- 09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
1079 Views
As I understand it
- 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
920 Views
Better...
- 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
909 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
- 06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
1022 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
- 09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
410 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
- 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
952 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
- 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
1011 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
- 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
1006 Views
The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
1040 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
1012 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
1049 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up? 
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
427 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
427 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool *NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
457 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
457 Views
Re: Natural selection
- 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
1014 Views
Thanks a lot
- 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
1142 Views
2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
892 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
1116 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
945 Views
My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
1005 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
912 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
1064 Views