Active Users:1279 Time:02/11/2025 07:53:22 PM
Re: My best guess Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM
As for Dawkins, I've read one of his books a few years ago and was unimpressed. I've done a minor in biology and geology, just to get some of the basics and jargon, so I'd prefer something more substantial if you don't mind.


I wouldn't call myself a Dawkins disciple so I am not pushing it because it was written by him; I am pushing it because the book is truly great from a science perspective. Give his book a chance, it is written simply, he goes through tremendous lengths to explain terminology and really it the best book to read in order to gather an understanding of the subject. After reading his book (if you want more) I would then use his book as a guide and find texts books on genetics, biochemistry, biological physics and others, to further your understanding. What I know has come from years of studying text books (I am finishing my PhD in plant physiology) and Dawkins’s book would have made it much simpler if I would have started there and then went on to the texts.

You could also read Darwin in you haven’t.
This message last edited by Night Walker on 07/08/2011 at 07:07:34 PM
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1170 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 814 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 935 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 888 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 893 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 740 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 953 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 742 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 969 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 967 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 862 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 900 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 906 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 988 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 854 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 803 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 803 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 895 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 1046 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 968 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 803 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 884 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 886 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 877 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 903 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 932 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 899 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 933 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 970 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 969 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 903 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 1038 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 796 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 1009 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 849 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 892 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 800 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 975 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 824 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 934 Views

Reply to Message