Active Users:495 Time:02/05/2025 06:32:08 PM
Re: My best guess Night Walker Send a noteboard - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM
As for Dawkins, I've read one of his books a few years ago and was unimpressed. I've done a minor in biology and geology, just to get some of the basics and jargon, so I'd prefer something more substantial if you don't mind.


I wouldn't call myself a Dawkins disciple so I am not pushing it because it was written by him; I am pushing it because the book is truly great from a science perspective. Give his book a chance, it is written simply, he goes through tremendous lengths to explain terminology and really it the best book to read in order to gather an understanding of the subject. After reading his book (if you want more) I would then use his book as a guide and find texts books on genetics, biochemistry, biological physics and others, to further your understanding. What I know has come from years of studying text books (I am finishing my PhD in plant physiology) and Dawkins’s book would have made it much simpler if I would have started there and then went on to the texts.

You could also read Darwin in you haven’t.
This message last edited by Night Walker on 07/08/2011 at 07:07:34 PM
Reply to message
Natural selection - 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM 1085 Views
selection for suitability - 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM 731 Views
Thanks for your responce - 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM 846 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it: - 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM 793 Views
Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM 774 Views
Yes it can - 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM 654 Views
But how? - 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM 849 Views
Okay, I think I see what you're saying - 08/08/2011 05:30:43 PM 665 Views
Close - 08/08/2011 05:41:46 PM 864 Views
Re: Just a question - 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM 870 Views
I'm not sure I understand you - 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM 772 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies. - 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM 793 Views
Then it is still a tautology - 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM 801 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations. - 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM 904 Views
Maybe... - 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM 758 Views
As I understand it - 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM 724 Views
Better... - 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM 704 Views
Actually - 06/08/2011 10:13:51 PM 793 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 10:37:33 PM 933 Views
Re: Actually - 06/08/2011 11:38:52 PM 859 Views
Oeh - 07/08/2011 01:54:19 PM 710 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM 805 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 06/08/2011 07:08:25 PM 805 Views
Re: Hmmm... there's some truth to that - 07/08/2011 12:46:23 AM 799 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify... - 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM 827 Views
The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM 818 Views
Re: The questions go deeper - 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM 808 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question. - 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM 830 Views
TalkOrigins addresses this at length. - 06/08/2011 11:14:52 PM 882 Views
Not very much, but interesting none the less - 06/08/2011 11:38:36 PM 879 Views
Re: Natural selection - 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM 803 Views
Thanks a lot - 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM 947 Views
2 things - 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM 711 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM 927 Views
Re: 2 things - 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM 741 Views
My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM 777 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM 715 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM 874 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM 719 Views
Re: My best guess - 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM 827 Views

Reply to Message