Well, I started reading Darwin, but I got distracted after a few pages (I usually have about half a douzen books I'm reading at the same time and sometimes one slips through 
)
Since you are more of an expert, I'll take your word on this newest Dawkins book and give him a second chance once I get around to it.
As for other books, I see Gould's name everywhere, what would be a good place to start with his view on things?
And Furuyma, Maynard Smith and Ruse (most of what I know about them is a bit outdated because I only know them from footnotes), are they any good? Some of their works have... challenging titles.
)Since you are more of an expert, I'll take your word on this newest Dawkins book and give him a second chance once I get around to it.
As for other books, I see Gould's name everywhere, what would be a good place to start with his view on things?
And Furuyma, Maynard Smith and Ruse (most of what I know about them is a bit outdated because I only know them from footnotes), are they any good? Some of their works have... challenging titles.
Natural selection
- 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
1169 Views
selection for suitability
- 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
814 Views
Thanks for your responce 
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
933 Views
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
933 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
- 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
888 Views
Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
891 Views
Yes it can
- 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
739 Views
But how?
- 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
951 Views
Re: Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
965 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
- 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
860 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
897 Views
Then it is still a tautology
- 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
904 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
- 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
987 Views
Maybe...
- 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
852 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
- 09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
920 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
- 09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
976 Views
As I understand it
- 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
802 Views
Better...
- 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
802 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
- 06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
924 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
- 09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
367 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
- 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
849 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
- 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
883 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
- 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
902 Views
The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
932 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
898 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
931 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up? 
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
380 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
380 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool *NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
405 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
405 Views
Re: Natural selection
- 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
902 Views
Thanks a lot
- 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
1037 Views
2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
795 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
1007 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
848 Views
My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
891 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
797 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
972 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 07:02:27 PM
823 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 09:09:57 PM
934 Views