No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
Joel Send a noteboard - 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
So maybe it wasn't perfect, but it got the job done. In the end, this may just be another great illustration of a fact well known and loathed by lawyers, scientists and other metaphysicians (a word I incidentally still dislike, if you're reading this, Dan 
): Things we can PROVE are only a subset of the much larger group of things we KNOW. God's not dead, but the Great Watchmaker died a long time ago with Schrödingers Cat.
): Things we can PROVE are only a subset of the much larger group of things we KNOW. God's not dead, but the Great Watchmaker died a long time ago with Schrödingers Cat.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Natural selection
- 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
1196 Views
selection for suitability
- 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
839 Views
Thanks for your responce 
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
965 Views
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
965 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
- 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
911 Views
Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
923 Views
Yes it can
- 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
768 Views
But how?
- 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
982 Views
Re: Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
1007 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
- 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
896 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
939 Views
Then it is still a tautology
- 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
939 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
- 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
1012 Views
Maybe...
- 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
887 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
- 09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
946 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
- 09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
1007 Views
As I understand it
- 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
836 Views
Better...
- 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
840 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
- 06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
954 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
- 09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
379 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
- 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
879 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
- 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
915 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
- 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
932 Views
The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
964 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
932 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
972 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up? 
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
398 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
398 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool *NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
425 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
425 Views
Re: Natural selection
- 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
938 Views
Thanks a lot
- 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
1074 Views
2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
820 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
1040 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
868 Views
My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
918 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
838 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
999 Views