The NAACP is a lobbying organization meant to support a specific minority. Specifically, black people. So, no, they do not rally for white prisoners. That would be a blatant misuse of their funds and departure from their charter. They are the National Association for the Advancement of Colored Persons, not the Happy Happy Protest Everything That is Wrong Club.
And read up on White Privilege, sometime. White people do not NEED our own version of the NAACP... we are already living in a society where things are substantially tipped in our favor.
And his statements indicated that our society abhors the execution of a black man, where the stats clearly indicate otherwise. Perhaps he was actually in possession of those facts, you could be right, but as he reacted in a way that indicated that he was not, I assumed his ignorance, rather than his stupidity.
All of the numbers I have presented so far are from the Justice Department. I haven't been able to find any specific count of black suspects vs white suspects, which would be interesting information, but I have also found this interesting tidbit... only 50% of murder victims since 1976 have been white... and yet 75% of the murder cases that end in an execution had a white victim.
If you want to go looking for the golden stat that proves in all of this that blacks are just more "murdery" and that is not indicative at all of institutionalized prejudice, then go right ahead. The stats I've found show otherwise, strongly so, and trying to pretend that they don't matter is just willful ignorance and indicates prejudice.
As with Dark Knights ignorance, I can't KNOW that you are a racist. You could be a completely tolerant person. All I have to go by is your posts. So I could be wrong. I am open to and hopeful of that possibility.
And read up on White Privilege, sometime. White people do not NEED our own version of the NAACP... we are already living in a society where things are substantially tipped in our favor.
And his statements indicated that our society abhors the execution of a black man, where the stats clearly indicate otherwise. Perhaps he was actually in possession of those facts, you could be right, but as he reacted in a way that indicated that he was not, I assumed his ignorance, rather than his stupidity.
All of the numbers I have presented so far are from the Justice Department. I haven't been able to find any specific count of black suspects vs white suspects, which would be interesting information, but I have also found this interesting tidbit... only 50% of murder victims since 1976 have been white... and yet 75% of the murder cases that end in an execution had a white victim.
If you want to go looking for the golden stat that proves in all of this that blacks are just more "murdery" and that is not indicative at all of institutionalized prejudice, then go right ahead. The stats I've found show otherwise, strongly so, and trying to pretend that they don't matter is just willful ignorance and indicates prejudice.
As with Dark Knights ignorance, I can't KNOW that you are a racist. You could be a completely tolerant person. All I have to go by is your posts. So I could be wrong. I am open to and hopeful of that possibility.
Eschew Verbosity
i'm proud to live in a country where you can be executed based on circumstantial evidence...
- 22/09/2011 04:06:07 PM
1611 Views
And yet the Supreme Court didn't stop it. You're a lawyer right?
- 22/09/2011 04:19:05 PM
960 Views
Well, that right there was an ignorant thing to say.
- 22/09/2011 04:32:49 PM
1024 Views
But they get all the media attention
- 22/09/2011 04:45:03 PM
899 Views
Cameron Todd Willingham is white, and his story is a national one since Perry is running for Pres
- 23/09/2011 03:41:52 PM
769 Views
those numbers are less schocking when you consider that blacks commet a lot more murders *NM*
- 22/09/2011 05:43:51 PM
391 Views
And this is a typically illogical argument.
- 22/09/2011 11:11:48 PM
934 Views
You're kidding, right?
- 23/09/2011 02:55:44 PM
914 Views
Re: You're kidding, right?
- 23/09/2011 07:36:38 PM
919 Views
Juror bias. *NM*
- 23/09/2011 08:35:10 PM
360 Views
Your evidence for that? *NM*
- 23/09/2011 11:33:58 PM
368 Views
Twenty-one years of life in the American South.
- 24/09/2011 12:40:10 AM
863 Views
Of course I'm interested
- 24/09/2011 04:03:51 AM
799 Views
From me being too involved with the subject material. I apologize.
- 24/09/2011 11:16:06 AM
774 Views
While I largely agree with your argument, I agree more with Cannoli on the NAACP.
- 23/09/2011 07:46:06 PM
844 Views
Huh.
- 22/09/2011 04:47:20 PM
964 Views
That jumped out at me too.
- 22/09/2011 04:50:52 PM
900 Views
What really confuses me
- 22/09/2011 04:58:32 PM
839 Views
That's a good question and I really wish it would be addressed.
- 22/09/2011 05:05:40 PM
952 Views
Re: That's a good question and I really wish it would be addressed.
- 22/09/2011 05:21:59 PM
982 Views
If the original trial is shown to be flawed that's supposed to require a new trial.
- 22/09/2011 08:25:51 PM
863 Views
Well...
- 22/09/2011 05:18:54 PM
1001 Views
So if I understand you correctly...
- 22/09/2011 05:23:00 PM
941 Views
Yes, that is correct. And proving witness coercion is likely to be difficult if not impossible. *NM*
- 22/09/2011 05:30:37 PM
335 Views
it is only confusing because the evidence isn't really that shaky
- 22/09/2011 08:54:21 PM
900 Views
If I understand the Supreme Court correctly, the reason they denied the stay of execution was
- 22/09/2011 08:25:14 PM
921 Views
I completely support the Death Penalty without question.....
- 22/09/2011 08:27:54 PM
822 Views
Unreasonable doubt is impossible to eliminate.
- 22/09/2011 09:54:43 PM
902 Views
Doubt can be eliminated.....any question about Dalmer?
- 23/09/2011 01:00:52 PM
956 Views
Maybe he was framed by an enemy, government conspiracy or aliens.
- 23/09/2011 01:54:21 PM
834 Views
Jigga what?
*NM*
- 23/09/2011 03:36:07 PM
472 Views
*NM*
- 23/09/2011 03:36:07 PM
472 Views
"I do not know if I was then a man dreaming I was a butterfly or am now a butterfly..."
- 23/09/2011 06:50:34 PM
823 Views
Circumstantial evidence is not, I believe, a bar to conviction.
- 22/09/2011 09:43:56 PM
800 Views
Regarding the salvation thing, that is an argument FOR the death penalty, in my mind.
- 22/09/2011 11:37:16 PM
866 Views
That motive is seflish and thus fatal.
- 23/09/2011 01:17:00 AM
816 Views
Bullshit
- 25/09/2011 03:53:05 AM
1027 Views
Where do YOU get the idea that imperfect contrition is good enough?
- 25/09/2011 02:29:18 PM
1354 Views
Thank God you're not an evangelist.
- 23/09/2011 02:59:06 PM
835 Views
And I pity the souls you have ministered to. They're in for a rude shock at their judgement
- 25/09/2011 04:01:05 AM
830 Views
lol roman catholicism *NM*
- 25/09/2011 04:39:55 AM
343 Views
Not just Roman Catholics, y'know, everyone who thinks God was not BSing about judgement.
- 25/09/2011 09:47:12 PM
885 Views
lol hellfire and brimstone *NM*
- 26/09/2011 12:12:28 AM
338 Views
I suppose in a consequences free world everything is a source of amusement.
- 26/09/2011 12:33:14 AM
1038 Views
You really don't understand irony, do you? Particularly as it applies to your post about this case.
- 22/09/2011 11:26:49 PM
944 Views
.
- 23/09/2011 08:21:38 AM
868 Views
A list of anecdotal wrongs does not prove anything. If convictions can be wrong, so can exonerations *NM*
- 25/09/2011 04:03:26 AM
345 Views
sorry if i don't have time to link to every
thing i've read on the subject
- 23/09/2011 02:54:50 PM
1018 Views
thing i've read on the subject
- 23/09/2011 02:54:50 PM
1018 Views
Well I would think you would have picked an article that offers some iota of proof of his innocence.
- 25/09/2011 04:14:45 AM
920 Views
Well, I wouldn't call eyewitness accounts circumstancial evidence.
- 23/09/2011 11:45:48 PM
846 Views
Nor would I, but I've heard that lawyers say, "an eye witness is the worst witness you can have."
- 25/09/2011 03:23:53 PM
835 Views

*NM*