But, looking at recent years, it seems like the only way to combat piracy is to make "legal" downloading more convenient than piracy. It's basically a given at this point that you can't create a file secure enough that it can't be hacked. And anti-piracy measures often become counter-productive: special keys and codes you need to save, needing your computer be always connected to the internet, only allowing a buyer to re-download a few times before his purchase "expires," restricting the ways you can use what you've bought. These things don't exist on pirated versions, so it just makes people more willing to pirate.
Music: iTunes isn't perfect, but it's been a step in the right direction. iTunes allows you to get the music you want quickly, safely, and relatively cheaply. It needs some work on DRM- if I buy a song, I want to do whatever the hell I want with it- but it's a good step.
Games: If you don't play video games, you've probably never heard of Steam. Steam is a computer program that acts as a kind of a super-iTunes for video games- you have a staggering library to browse through, and things are often cheap or on sale.
Amazingly though, Steam has very little DRM. Your games are saved to your account, and you can install them and uninstall them as much as you want. You need to be online to buy and download the game, but once it's on your computer, that's all. Moreover, Steam is well-known for customer service and ease-of-use.
I used to pirate a TON of games back in the day. Various reasons, sometimes I couldn't afford it, sometimes I couldn't find it, sometimes I was lazy, etc. Steam fixes a lot of those problems. 90% of the games on Steam I probably could have gotten for free if I had tried really hard to pirate them, but that's the key- "try really hard." Do I really want to spend an entire day downloading various disc images and CD keys and patches? Or do I want to click 2 buttons and be done with it?
Movies/TV Again, this comes down to ease-of-use. People want to watch what they want, when they want. With Tivo, Netflix, and more importantly, the Internet, they can. I LOVE watching professional-grade episodes of shows on network web sites. Only problem? The networks are often terrible about archiving.
If I want to watch something from Season 2 of Archer, legally? Out of luck. Can't find it on the network's site. Netflix doesn't have it. The DVD isn't for sale.
But, oh look, I can go to any number of unauthorized streaming sites, and watch it. So again, "pirating" means I have to search through dozens of shady links of poor quality before finding what I want.
Maybe Joel or others will say, "it's not for sale, it's their IP, too bad." To them I say, you're living in a dream world. It's 2012. If it exists, you can get it online. The only demonstrated way to reduce piracy is to make it convenient to obtain something legally.
(Which, as I think has been mentioned in a previous post, is why SOPA is a failure on multiple levels- it wouldn't even stop piracy)
The "we must stamp out piracy at all costs!" mindset of the older studios, while understandable, isn't particularly productive. The way to deal with the problem is to figure out where the new markets are (the Internet) and how best to deal with them (by making thing as open and easy as possible).
Music: iTunes isn't perfect, but it's been a step in the right direction. iTunes allows you to get the music you want quickly, safely, and relatively cheaply. It needs some work on DRM- if I buy a song, I want to do whatever the hell I want with it- but it's a good step.
Games: If you don't play video games, you've probably never heard of Steam. Steam is a computer program that acts as a kind of a super-iTunes for video games- you have a staggering library to browse through, and things are often cheap or on sale.
Amazingly though, Steam has very little DRM. Your games are saved to your account, and you can install them and uninstall them as much as you want. You need to be online to buy and download the game, but once it's on your computer, that's all. Moreover, Steam is well-known for customer service and ease-of-use.
I used to pirate a TON of games back in the day. Various reasons, sometimes I couldn't afford it, sometimes I couldn't find it, sometimes I was lazy, etc. Steam fixes a lot of those problems. 90% of the games on Steam I probably could have gotten for free if I had tried really hard to pirate them, but that's the key- "try really hard." Do I really want to spend an entire day downloading various disc images and CD keys and patches? Or do I want to click 2 buttons and be done with it?
Movies/TV Again, this comes down to ease-of-use. People want to watch what they want, when they want. With Tivo, Netflix, and more importantly, the Internet, they can. I LOVE watching professional-grade episodes of shows on network web sites. Only problem? The networks are often terrible about archiving.
If I want to watch something from Season 2 of Archer, legally? Out of luck. Can't find it on the network's site. Netflix doesn't have it. The DVD isn't for sale.
But, oh look, I can go to any number of unauthorized streaming sites, and watch it. So again, "pirating" means I have to search through dozens of shady links of poor quality before finding what I want.
Maybe Joel or others will say, "it's not for sale, it's their IP, too bad." To them I say, you're living in a dream world. It's 2012. If it exists, you can get it online. The only demonstrated way to reduce piracy is to make it convenient to obtain something legally.
(Which, as I think has been mentioned in a previous post, is why SOPA is a failure on multiple levels- it wouldn't even stop piracy)
The "we must stamp out piracy at all costs!" mindset of the older studios, while understandable, isn't particularly productive. The way to deal with the problem is to figure out where the new markets are (the Internet) and how best to deal with them (by making thing as open and easy as possible).
English Wikipedia Anti-SOPA Blackout
- 17/01/2012 08:31:46 AM
2426 Views
Yeah, man, because currently copyright holders have no recourse, am I right?
- 17/01/2012 11:47:35 AM
1246 Views
"altering the infrastructure of the Internet so as to render RAFO virtually inaccessible"?
- 17/01/2012 08:12:27 PM
1341 Views
- 17/01/2012 08:12:27 PM
1341 Views
I'll go ahead and ask before I get my panties in a bunch: do you understand these bills?
- 17/01/2012 09:09:22 PM
1453 Views
I admit I have not looked into it much
- 17/01/2012 11:42:30 PM
1310 Views
And yet you're still arguing the matter.
- 18/01/2012 02:34:04 AM
1404 Views
- 18/01/2012 02:34:04 AM
1404 Views
I love you. *NM*
- 18/01/2012 03:41:03 AM
782 Views
heh, thanks. I usually find myself pushing minority opinions. Nice to be "appreciated" for once.
*NM*
- 18/01/2012 04:01:10 AM
758 Views
*NM*
- 18/01/2012 04:01:10 AM
758 Views
Can i second the adulation?
- 18/01/2012 04:07:17 AM
1103 Views
I too (three?) appreciate the common sense and reasonable explanations. *NM*
- 18/01/2012 04:12:59 AM
748 Views
Right, because the argument is not just over THIS bill but, apparently, over ANY bill.
- 18/01/2012 11:09:13 AM
1297 Views
Alternatives to SOPA/PIPA have been proposed for months now. Please stop arguing this.
- 18/01/2012 05:42:10 PM
1197 Views
Also, in the case of the OPEN Act, it has not "been proposed for months."
- 18/01/2012 07:28:15 PM
1738 Views
"sensitive federal content"? Provide a source justifying this claim and it's relevance, please.
- 18/01/2012 05:59:47 PM
1317 Views
I would not have thought a source necessary.
- 18/01/2012 06:24:44 PM
1319 Views
Okay, I'm with Aemon now.
- 18/01/2012 07:36:21 PM
1309 Views
OK.
- 18/01/2012 10:16:16 PM
1370 Views
should be interesting
- 17/01/2012 12:41:47 PM
1178 Views
Could be; depends on a lot of factors.
- 17/01/2012 07:38:55 PM
1249 Views
See, that's one of the biggest problems that people aren't understanding.
- 17/01/2012 09:31:38 PM
1243 Views
So tell them that.
- 17/01/2012 11:54:19 PM
1406 Views
Joel, I think I'm done with this unless you want to do some research.
- 18/01/2012 02:53:19 AM
1216 Views
Research would tell me what is wrong with these bills and how a good bill should look.
- 18/01/2012 11:22:46 AM
1305 Views
Could've done without the snide rejoinder, but, good.
- 17/01/2012 02:20:08 PM
1153 Views
I love the black banner, like some kind of internet Holocaust.
- 17/01/2012 08:03:27 PM
1304 Views
Are you aware that SOPA/PIPA has nothing to do with hackers and everything to do with copyright?
- 18/01/2012 02:08:56 AM
1156 Views
There seems to be some overlap.
- 18/01/2012 01:08:22 PM
1291 Views
Re: There seems to be some overlap.
- 18/01/2012 08:13:15 PM
1184 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap.
- 18/01/2012 10:27:32 PM
1448 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap.
- 18/01/2012 11:30:39 PM
1266 Views
Just because the news does not mention something does not automatically make it non-applicable.
- 19/01/2012 04:08:58 PM
1304 Views
Re: Just because the news does not mention something does not automatically make it non-applicable.
- 19/01/2012 10:39:40 PM
1286 Views
If you re-read your last sentence it should be clear why this law is being pushed.
- 20/01/2012 09:12:29 PM
1565 Views
Re: If you re-read your last sentence it should be clear why this law is being pushed.
- 21/01/2012 03:19:49 AM
1154 Views
Er, what Ghav said.
- 18/01/2012 02:30:37 AM
1210 Views
Sorry, protecting Pirate Bay and offshore gambling are not compelling counterarguments.
- 18/01/2012 11:38:08 AM
1228 Views
Okay, another analogy:
- 18/01/2012 02:04:12 PM
1211 Views
The devil is always in the details, and it seems clear the details need great revision.
- 18/01/2012 03:31:20 PM
1229 Views
what they SHOULD do is stop taking money from proponents of sopa/pipa
- 18/01/2012 03:51:09 PM
1276 Views
Yes, they should, but, once again, that approach will not prevent a new law.
- 18/01/2012 04:05:02 PM
1288 Views
Re: The devil is always in the details, and it seems clear the details need great revision.
- 18/01/2012 04:27:30 PM
1248 Views
If the US government wants to summarily block sites within the US, it already can and will.
- 18/01/2012 06:15:53 PM
1224 Views
You know all this anti-SOPA bullshit is making me hope the bill passes.
- 18/01/2012 04:00:17 AM
1271 Views
I would not go THAT far; it seems clear these bills have many objectionable provisions.
- 18/01/2012 11:41:23 AM
1280 Views
Re: I would not go THAT far; it seems clear these bills have many objectionable provisions.
- 19/01/2012 01:57:46 AM
1106 Views
Yeah, the extreme bias on both sides is why the bills will likely pass more or less as written.
- 19/01/2012 03:31:52 PM
1300 Views
joel, you need to consider three things
- 18/01/2012 06:06:16 AM
1280 Views
You need to consider that they WILL pass some legislation, and what you want it to contain.
- 18/01/2012 12:15:38 PM
1307 Views
again, it's not about piracy, it's about protecting the mpaa/riaa business model at our expense
- 18/01/2012 03:34:32 PM
1380 Views
Yeah, see, that is the problem: "it's not about piracy."
- 18/01/2012 03:57:55 PM
1204 Views
if piracy is such a problem then the mpaa/riaa need to PROVE their losses
- 19/01/2012 02:43:31 AM
1193 Views
How do you expect anyone to prove what people WOULD HAVE bought if they could not just take it?
- 19/01/2012 03:57:24 PM
1540 Views
A technical examination of SOPA and PROTECT IP
- 18/01/2012 08:32:44 AM
1204 Views
"As a disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, I'm a sysadmin."
- 18/01/2012 12:47:16 PM
1437 Views
Wikipedia has already convinced me
- 18/01/2012 03:26:01 PM
1065 Views
Trying to stop this legislation without proposing an alternative is trying to stop ANY legislation.
- 18/01/2012 03:44:18 PM
1275 Views
It isn't their job to propose legislation
- 18/01/2012 04:12:53 PM
1195 Views
No, but they have as much RIGHT to do so as anyone else.
- 18/01/2012 05:31:55 PM
1174 Views
Strike three.
- 18/01/2012 05:37:55 PM
1315 Views
That is fine; that is what people SHOULD be doing.
- 18/01/2012 06:03:59 PM
1055 Views
Things being better now than they would be under SOPA seems like a legitimate argument to me
- 18/01/2012 09:04:18 PM
1334 Views
Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no.
- 18/01/2012 10:46:48 PM
1192 Views
About "proposing new legislation"
- 18/01/2012 04:45:08 PM
1309 Views
So true
- 18/01/2012 05:08:45 PM
1268 Views
Not to go off on a tangent about combatting piracy...
- 18/01/2012 05:38:12 PM
1183 Views
That was an excellent post. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 11:18:19 PM
736 Views
Re: About "proposing new legislation"
- 18/01/2012 05:59:55 PM
1409 Views
Hm, you should read my post one above about combatting online piracy.
- 18/01/2012 06:20:16 PM
1363 Views
I would not recommend photocopying a book and handing it out on street corners.
- 18/01/2012 06:45:52 PM
1278 Views
Not to blame, neccessarily. But you have to live in the real world.
- 18/01/2012 07:31:18 PM
1241 Views
Re: Not to blame, neccessarily. But you have to live in the real world.
- 18/01/2012 08:55:59 PM
1285 Views
I always liked the codewheels SSI provided with copies of their Gold Box AD&D games.
- 18/01/2012 10:07:40 PM
1422 Views
These are really different arguments
- 19/01/2012 12:05:10 AM
1171 Views
TV is slightly different, because regional availability becomes a factor.
- 19/01/2012 04:18:58 PM
1190 Views
Yeah, so I use Russian wikipedia for a day. Or German wikipedia, or French, or Italian... *NM*
- 18/01/2012 06:23:36 PM
810 Views
Or just hit stop right before the script runs. *NM*
- 18/01/2012 06:52:40 PM
794 Views
Or just disable Java. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 01:58:03 AM
656 Views
That's not as much fun though. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 02:13:44 AM
786 Views
Exactly, this way its kind of a game. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 02:20:37 AM
587 Views
I really don't see the fun in that. Wikipedia is just a tool, not a game. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 04:59:14 AM
702 Views
I don't know about those (except French), but none of the ones I ever used are remotely as good. *NM*
- 18/01/2012 08:13:47 PM
781 Views
Russian wikipedia is very good if you're not checking some obscure Western cultural phenomena.
- 19/01/2012 01:57:43 AM
1361 Views
Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia...
- 19/01/2012 01:07:38 AM
1287 Views
Re: Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia... *NM*
- 19/01/2012 01:34:46 AM
833 Views
Oh, no; now Congress will be inundated with complaints from lazy college students!
- 19/01/2012 04:40:12 PM
1325 Views
- 19/01/2012 04:40:12 PM
1325 Views
13 previously unopposed senators now do not support SOPA.
- 19/01/2012 11:36:15 PM
1313 Views
How does that "rebutt" what was a facetious post in the first place?
- 20/01/2012 09:24:27 PM
1388 Views


