But, looking at recent years, it seems like the only way to combat piracy is to make "legal" downloading more convenient than piracy. It's basically a given at this point that you can't create a file secure enough that it can't be hacked. And anti-piracy measures often become counter-productive: special keys and codes you need to save, needing your computer be always connected to the internet, only allowing a buyer to re-download a few times before his purchase "expires," restricting the ways you can use what you've bought. These things don't exist on pirated versions, so it just makes people more willing to pirate.
Music: iTunes isn't perfect, but it's been a step in the right direction. iTunes allows you to get the music you want quickly, safely, and relatively cheaply. It needs some work on DRM- if I buy a song, I want to do whatever the hell I want with it- but it's a good step.
Games: If you don't play video games, you've probably never heard of Steam. Steam is a computer program that acts as a kind of a super-iTunes for video games- you have a staggering library to browse through, and things are often cheap or on sale.
Amazingly though, Steam has very little DRM. Your games are saved to your account, and you can install them and uninstall them as much as you want. You need to be online to buy and download the game, but once it's on your computer, that's all. Moreover, Steam is well-known for customer service and ease-of-use.
I used to pirate a TON of games back in the day. Various reasons, sometimes I couldn't afford it, sometimes I couldn't find it, sometimes I was lazy, etc. Steam fixes a lot of those problems. 90% of the games on Steam I probably could have gotten for free if I had tried really hard to pirate them, but that's the key- "try really hard." Do I really want to spend an entire day downloading various disc images and CD keys and patches? Or do I want to click 2 buttons and be done with it?
Movies/TV Again, this comes down to ease-of-use. People want to watch what they want, when they want. With Tivo, Netflix, and more importantly, the Internet, they can. I LOVE watching professional-grade episodes of shows on network web sites. Only problem? The networks are often terrible about archiving.
If I want to watch something from Season 2 of Archer, legally? Out of luck. Can't find it on the network's site. Netflix doesn't have it. The DVD isn't for sale.
But, oh look, I can go to any number of unauthorized streaming sites, and watch it. So again, "pirating" means I have to search through dozens of shady links of poor quality before finding what I want.
Maybe Joel or others will say, "it's not for sale, it's their IP, too bad." To them I say, you're living in a dream world. It's 2012. If it exists, you can get it online. The only demonstrated way to reduce piracy is to make it convenient to obtain something legally.
(Which, as I think has been mentioned in a previous post, is why SOPA is a failure on multiple levels- it wouldn't even stop piracy)
The "we must stamp out piracy at all costs!" mindset of the older studios, while understandable, isn't particularly productive. The way to deal with the problem is to figure out where the new markets are (the Internet) and how best to deal with them (by making thing as open and easy as possible).
Music: iTunes isn't perfect, but it's been a step in the right direction. iTunes allows you to get the music you want quickly, safely, and relatively cheaply. It needs some work on DRM- if I buy a song, I want to do whatever the hell I want with it- but it's a good step.
Games: If you don't play video games, you've probably never heard of Steam. Steam is a computer program that acts as a kind of a super-iTunes for video games- you have a staggering library to browse through, and things are often cheap or on sale.
Amazingly though, Steam has very little DRM. Your games are saved to your account, and you can install them and uninstall them as much as you want. You need to be online to buy and download the game, but once it's on your computer, that's all. Moreover, Steam is well-known for customer service and ease-of-use.
I used to pirate a TON of games back in the day. Various reasons, sometimes I couldn't afford it, sometimes I couldn't find it, sometimes I was lazy, etc. Steam fixes a lot of those problems. 90% of the games on Steam I probably could have gotten for free if I had tried really hard to pirate them, but that's the key- "try really hard." Do I really want to spend an entire day downloading various disc images and CD keys and patches? Or do I want to click 2 buttons and be done with it?
Movies/TV Again, this comes down to ease-of-use. People want to watch what they want, when they want. With Tivo, Netflix, and more importantly, the Internet, they can. I LOVE watching professional-grade episodes of shows on network web sites. Only problem? The networks are often terrible about archiving.
If I want to watch something from Season 2 of Archer, legally? Out of luck. Can't find it on the network's site. Netflix doesn't have it. The DVD isn't for sale.
But, oh look, I can go to any number of unauthorized streaming sites, and watch it. So again, "pirating" means I have to search through dozens of shady links of poor quality before finding what I want.
Maybe Joel or others will say, "it's not for sale, it's their IP, too bad." To them I say, you're living in a dream world. It's 2012. If it exists, you can get it online. The only demonstrated way to reduce piracy is to make it convenient to obtain something legally.
(Which, as I think has been mentioned in a previous post, is why SOPA is a failure on multiple levels- it wouldn't even stop piracy)
The "we must stamp out piracy at all costs!" mindset of the older studios, while understandable, isn't particularly productive. The way to deal with the problem is to figure out where the new markets are (the Internet) and how best to deal with them (by making thing as open and easy as possible).
English Wikipedia Anti-SOPA Blackout
- 17/01/2012 08:31:46 AM
2402 Views
Yeah, man, because currently copyright holders have no recourse, am I right?
- 17/01/2012 11:47:35 AM
1221 Views
"altering the infrastructure of the Internet so as to render RAFO virtually inaccessible"?
- 17/01/2012 08:12:27 PM
1312 Views
- 17/01/2012 08:12:27 PM
1312 Views
I'll go ahead and ask before I get my panties in a bunch: do you understand these bills?
- 17/01/2012 09:09:22 PM
1422 Views
I admit I have not looked into it much
- 17/01/2012 11:42:30 PM
1281 Views
And yet you're still arguing the matter.
- 18/01/2012 02:34:04 AM
1375 Views
- 18/01/2012 02:34:04 AM
1375 Views
I love you. *NM*
- 18/01/2012 03:41:03 AM
768 Views
heh, thanks. I usually find myself pushing minority opinions. Nice to be "appreciated" for once.
*NM*
- 18/01/2012 04:01:10 AM
742 Views
*NM*
- 18/01/2012 04:01:10 AM
742 Views
Can i second the adulation?
- 18/01/2012 04:07:17 AM
1079 Views
I too (three?) appreciate the common sense and reasonable explanations. *NM*
- 18/01/2012 04:12:59 AM
733 Views
Right, because the argument is not just over THIS bill but, apparently, over ANY bill.
- 18/01/2012 11:09:13 AM
1273 Views
Alternatives to SOPA/PIPA have been proposed for months now. Please stop arguing this.
- 18/01/2012 05:42:10 PM
1174 Views
Also, in the case of the OPEN Act, it has not "been proposed for months."
- 18/01/2012 07:28:15 PM
1710 Views
"sensitive federal content"? Provide a source justifying this claim and it's relevance, please.
- 18/01/2012 05:59:47 PM
1296 Views
I would not have thought a source necessary.
- 18/01/2012 06:24:44 PM
1290 Views
Okay, I'm with Aemon now.
- 18/01/2012 07:36:21 PM
1280 Views
OK.
- 18/01/2012 10:16:16 PM
1336 Views
should be interesting
- 17/01/2012 12:41:47 PM
1146 Views
Could be; depends on a lot of factors.
- 17/01/2012 07:38:55 PM
1219 Views
See, that's one of the biggest problems that people aren't understanding.
- 17/01/2012 09:31:38 PM
1219 Views
So tell them that.
- 17/01/2012 11:54:19 PM
1377 Views
Joel, I think I'm done with this unless you want to do some research.
- 18/01/2012 02:53:19 AM
1185 Views
Research would tell me what is wrong with these bills and how a good bill should look.
- 18/01/2012 11:22:46 AM
1272 Views
Could've done without the snide rejoinder, but, good.
- 17/01/2012 02:20:08 PM
1125 Views
I love the black banner, like some kind of internet Holocaust.
- 17/01/2012 08:03:27 PM
1279 Views
Are you aware that SOPA/PIPA has nothing to do with hackers and everything to do with copyright?
- 18/01/2012 02:08:56 AM
1129 Views
There seems to be some overlap.
- 18/01/2012 01:08:22 PM
1261 Views
Re: There seems to be some overlap.
- 18/01/2012 08:13:15 PM
1153 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap.
- 18/01/2012 10:27:32 PM
1423 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap.
- 18/01/2012 11:30:39 PM
1233 Views
Just because the news does not mention something does not automatically make it non-applicable.
- 19/01/2012 04:08:58 PM
1270 Views
Re: Just because the news does not mention something does not automatically make it non-applicable.
- 19/01/2012 10:39:40 PM
1256 Views
If you re-read your last sentence it should be clear why this law is being pushed.
- 20/01/2012 09:12:29 PM
1536 Views
Re: If you re-read your last sentence it should be clear why this law is being pushed.
- 21/01/2012 03:19:49 AM
1129 Views
Er, what Ghav said.
- 18/01/2012 02:30:37 AM
1185 Views
Sorry, protecting Pirate Bay and offshore gambling are not compelling counterarguments.
- 18/01/2012 11:38:08 AM
1200 Views
Okay, another analogy:
- 18/01/2012 02:04:12 PM
1179 Views
The devil is always in the details, and it seems clear the details need great revision.
- 18/01/2012 03:31:20 PM
1203 Views
what they SHOULD do is stop taking money from proponents of sopa/pipa
- 18/01/2012 03:51:09 PM
1256 Views
Yes, they should, but, once again, that approach will not prevent a new law.
- 18/01/2012 04:05:02 PM
1262 Views
Re: The devil is always in the details, and it seems clear the details need great revision.
- 18/01/2012 04:27:30 PM
1222 Views
If the US government wants to summarily block sites within the US, it already can and will.
- 18/01/2012 06:15:53 PM
1193 Views
You know all this anti-SOPA bullshit is making me hope the bill passes.
- 18/01/2012 04:00:17 AM
1246 Views
I would not go THAT far; it seems clear these bills have many objectionable provisions.
- 18/01/2012 11:41:23 AM
1248 Views
Re: I would not go THAT far; it seems clear these bills have many objectionable provisions.
- 19/01/2012 01:57:46 AM
1077 Views
Yeah, the extreme bias on both sides is why the bills will likely pass more or less as written.
- 19/01/2012 03:31:52 PM
1275 Views
joel, you need to consider three things
- 18/01/2012 06:06:16 AM
1249 Views
You need to consider that they WILL pass some legislation, and what you want it to contain.
- 18/01/2012 12:15:38 PM
1276 Views
again, it's not about piracy, it's about protecting the mpaa/riaa business model at our expense
- 18/01/2012 03:34:32 PM
1356 Views
Yeah, see, that is the problem: "it's not about piracy."
- 18/01/2012 03:57:55 PM
1175 Views
if piracy is such a problem then the mpaa/riaa need to PROVE their losses
- 19/01/2012 02:43:31 AM
1164 Views
How do you expect anyone to prove what people WOULD HAVE bought if they could not just take it?
- 19/01/2012 03:57:24 PM
1505 Views
A technical examination of SOPA and PROTECT IP
- 18/01/2012 08:32:44 AM
1175 Views
"As a disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, I'm a sysadmin."
- 18/01/2012 12:47:16 PM
1410 Views
Wikipedia has already convinced me
- 18/01/2012 03:26:01 PM
1034 Views
Trying to stop this legislation without proposing an alternative is trying to stop ANY legislation.
- 18/01/2012 03:44:18 PM
1247 Views
It isn't their job to propose legislation
- 18/01/2012 04:12:53 PM
1163 Views
No, but they have as much RIGHT to do so as anyone else.
- 18/01/2012 05:31:55 PM
1148 Views
Strike three.
- 18/01/2012 05:37:55 PM
1289 Views
That is fine; that is what people SHOULD be doing.
- 18/01/2012 06:03:59 PM
1035 Views
Things being better now than they would be under SOPA seems like a legitimate argument to me
- 18/01/2012 09:04:18 PM
1307 Views
Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no.
- 18/01/2012 10:46:48 PM
1159 Views
About "proposing new legislation"
- 18/01/2012 04:45:08 PM
1283 Views
So true
- 18/01/2012 05:08:45 PM
1233 Views
Not to go off on a tangent about combatting piracy...
- 18/01/2012 05:38:12 PM
1153 Views
That was an excellent post. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 11:18:19 PM
725 Views
Re: About "proposing new legislation"
- 18/01/2012 05:59:55 PM
1386 Views
Hm, you should read my post one above about combatting online piracy.
- 18/01/2012 06:20:16 PM
1325 Views
I would not recommend photocopying a book and handing it out on street corners.
- 18/01/2012 06:45:52 PM
1255 Views
Not to blame, neccessarily. But you have to live in the real world.
- 18/01/2012 07:31:18 PM
1214 Views
Re: Not to blame, neccessarily. But you have to live in the real world.
- 18/01/2012 08:55:59 PM
1252 Views
I always liked the codewheels SSI provided with copies of their Gold Box AD&D games.
- 18/01/2012 10:07:40 PM
1399 Views
These are really different arguments
- 19/01/2012 12:05:10 AM
1148 Views
TV is slightly different, because regional availability becomes a factor.
- 19/01/2012 04:18:58 PM
1160 Views
Yeah, so I use Russian wikipedia for a day. Or German wikipedia, or French, or Italian... *NM*
- 18/01/2012 06:23:36 PM
797 Views
Or just hit stop right before the script runs. *NM*
- 18/01/2012 06:52:40 PM
778 Views
Or just disable Java. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 01:58:03 AM
643 Views
That's not as much fun though. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 02:13:44 AM
773 Views
Exactly, this way its kind of a game. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 02:20:37 AM
574 Views
I really don't see the fun in that. Wikipedia is just a tool, not a game. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 04:59:14 AM
689 Views
I don't know about those (except French), but none of the ones I ever used are remotely as good. *NM*
- 18/01/2012 08:13:47 PM
771 Views
Russian wikipedia is very good if you're not checking some obscure Western cultural phenomena.
- 19/01/2012 01:57:43 AM
1329 Views
Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia...
- 19/01/2012 01:07:38 AM
1261 Views
Re: Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia... *NM*
- 19/01/2012 01:34:46 AM
811 Views
Oh, no; now Congress will be inundated with complaints from lazy college students!
- 19/01/2012 04:40:12 PM
1298 Views
- 19/01/2012 04:40:12 PM
1298 Views
13 previously unopposed senators now do not support SOPA.
- 19/01/2012 11:36:15 PM
1280 Views
How does that "rebutt" what was a facetious post in the first place?
- 20/01/2012 09:24:27 PM
1356 Views


