Active Users:704 Time:05/09/2025 02:47:45 PM
he will lose in arbitration, whether or not he is innocent. that's the point moondog Send a noteboard - 28/08/2012 03:55:38 PM
whether or not he failed 100 tests, you'd think that would be the kind of thing that got reported in all these stories about him since he walked away from arbitration. yes, arbitration, not an actual trial with a chance of appeal. also, the UCI has not actually stripped armstrong of any wins yet, they seem to believe that he has not tested positive for any banned drugs, or are at least willing to hear the actual evidence provided to them.

look, i know you seem to have a personal vendetta against armstrong for some reason, whatever that may be. i know i have my own share of athletes i just can't stand to see succeed. but the fact still remains that the USADA is the only one seemingly concerned with this case, everyone else who has any influence seems to be on armstrong's side. if we took the lot of them to arbitration with USADA maybe there would be a fair hearing. as it is, the USADA will win arbitration no matter what the facts are so he is simply walking away from the process because he knows he will lose either way.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Lance Armstrong - drugs cheat. - 24/08/2012 10:51:35 AM 1692 Views
You mean giving up in disgust after relentless hounding? - 24/08/2012 11:34:05 AM 969 Views
No, I meant what I said - 24/08/2012 12:08:05 PM 1047 Views
Delighted - 24/08/2012 12:21:12 PM 923 Views
Re: Delighted - 24/08/2012 12:36:20 PM 1189 Views
you think the case against Contador is fishy but you cheerlead the witch hunt of Armstong? - 25/08/2012 04:11:23 AM 925 Views
No. Can you please reread what I actually wrote. - 25/08/2012 09:46:47 AM 862 Views
Snoop = hypocrite - great job random! *NM* - 25/08/2012 04:27:38 PM 520 Views
Damage to cycling? LMAO good one! *NM* - 24/08/2012 03:23:48 PM 476 Views
Yea I choked up a bit when I read that - 25/08/2012 12:09:13 AM 980 Views
Sad thing is I wondered who would be awarded the victory now his have been stripped... - 24/08/2012 05:31:20 PM 920 Views
And this is why I have a hard time blaming Armstrong. - 24/08/2012 06:16:14 PM 979 Views
I don't. - 24/08/2012 11:51:14 PM 996 Views
Oh come on. - 25/08/2012 01:18:18 AM 1149 Views
Yes? - 25/08/2012 10:07:34 AM 1050 Views
No. - 25/08/2012 12:53:49 PM 1069 Views
Oh. - 26/08/2012 05:28:50 PM 1068 Views
And this is why doping must be vigorously and strictly punished. - 25/08/2012 11:50:52 PM 1056 Views
Hopefully they will leave the 1st places empty - 24/08/2012 11:44:49 PM 884 Views
That is one of things I find suspicious about the denials. - 26/08/2012 03:01:30 AM 941 Views
Re: That is one of things I find suspicious about the denials. - 26/08/2012 05:32:38 PM 951 Views
It is not proof, only far from conclusive evidence. - 26/08/2012 11:02:38 PM 996 Views
I really don't know anymore what to think on Armstrong. - 24/08/2012 06:53:04 PM 978 Views
Re: I really don't know anymore what to think on Armstrong. - 24/08/2012 11:59:14 PM 1046 Views
Haters gotta hate. Its not like he's gonna get a fair hearing. *NM* - 24/08/2012 10:25:18 PM 491 Views
Yeah, they were going to use evidence and everything against him and not cower before his bullying - 25/08/2012 12:01:44 AM 888 Views
Nevermind, saw your post up above *NM* - 25/08/2012 01:05:03 AM 497 Views
Your reaction seems kinda over the top and spiteful, what's up with that? - 25/08/2012 01:15:12 AM 1076 Views
Pleasure at seeing someone who has bullied and blustered for so long faced with justice. - 25/08/2012 10:11:15 AM 982 Views
You are a very small-minded person. - 25/08/2012 04:26:46 PM 987 Views
And you are a very annoying person. - 25/08/2012 06:06:50 PM 961 Views
In the immortal words of Anonymous2000 ... "+1" - 25/08/2012 06:32:10 PM 1092 Views
-1 - 25/08/2012 10:23:25 PM 885 Views
I don't think 'nemesis' is a term that should be used regarding sporting events - 25/08/2012 07:51:35 PM 1035 Views
Heh. This exchange is reminding me of Yes, Minister. - 25/08/2012 10:04:59 PM 922 Views
I've actually seen that show - 26/08/2012 05:33:31 AM 997 Views
As Legolas said, I think it is apprioriate - 26/08/2012 05:36:08 PM 843 Views
I'm really not in a position to judge, though obviously I'm inclined to disagree - 26/08/2012 05:41:49 PM 916 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 26/08/2012 05:47:36 PM 516 Views
i've got ten RAFOlk who testify they saw you punch babies, you should be stripped of posting here - 25/08/2012 04:09:53 PM 917 Views
+1 - Anyone that thinks this isn't a sham/witch hunt is a moron. *NM* - 25/08/2012 04:23:55 PM 494 Views
You're not stupid, so I'm going to assume you know why your post is nonsense. - 26/08/2012 05:37:49 PM 842 Views
he will lose in arbitration, whether or not he is innocent. that's the point - 28/08/2012 03:55:38 PM 999 Views
but he was the guy who had cancer - 26/08/2012 12:26:34 AM 906 Views
I refer you to the Goldman dilema - 26/08/2012 05:41:26 PM 790 Views
but that's just dumb *NM* - 26/08/2012 10:23:34 PM 590 Views
Well - 27/08/2012 09:32:30 AM 1313 Views
On that first point - 27/08/2012 10:37:34 AM 1001 Views

Reply to Message