Active Users:439 Time:17/06/2025 03:40:22 AM
I was gonna keep it to one thread, but hell, I'll join yours. Dannymac Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 05:24:26 AM
That was some of the worst fourth quarter refereeing ever. Seriously, ever. The only reason the Seahawks were ever even in scoring position was the horrible calling. The faux-roughing the passer. The offensive PI that was called defensive. The interception ruled an offensive touchdown was just the cum frosting on top of the shit cake.

These refs are not bad, they are incompetent. They do not know the rules, they cannot control the players, they are a joke. A bad joke.

Eschew Verbosity
Reply to message
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM 688 Views
I was gonna keep it to one thread, but hell, I'll join yours. - 25/09/2012 05:24:26 AM 758 Views
Link? Clip? - 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM 717 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM 442 Views
Here's a link. - 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM 811 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM 633 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:52:55 AM 863 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 06:13:46 AM 818 Views
youtube link - 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM 828 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD. - 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM 717 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened - 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM 983 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver. - 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM 1324 Views
watch a better replay if you can - 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM 780 Views
Have now; still not convinced. - 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM 827 Views
that's ok. you're still wrong - 26/09/2012 04:12:56 AM 840 Views
I know you are but what am I? *MN* - 26/09/2012 04:48:47 AM 779 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM 383 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited. - 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM 931 Views
Wait, you're not in Houston? *NM* - 26/09/2012 01:42:45 AM 400 Views
Not since the Texas Sesquicentennial, no. - 26/09/2012 01:45:29 AM 696 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees... - 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM 901 Views
Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM 895 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM 803 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball. - 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM 733 Views
There are good views on nfl.com. Will link. - 26/09/2012 02:16:51 AM 877 Views
Thanks; I still do not see much to change my mind. - 26/09/2012 02:32:43 AM 804 Views
The last call was a joke. - 25/09/2012 06:52:59 AM 752 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year - 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM 837 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too..... - 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM 783 Views
They can't reverse that call. - 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM 863 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete - 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM 840 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM 508 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM 416 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM 381 Views
Just so you can get this information without namecalling ... - 25/09/2012 04:18:41 PM 755 Views
No I mean he hasn't seen the replay over and over on ESPN *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:21:46 PM 388 Views
Interesting. What is the rule with arguing refs? - 25/09/2012 05:18:35 PM 700 Views
That response was disturbingly like my thoughts on the play. - 26/09/2012 01:49:37 AM 796 Views
As a Seahawks fan. - 25/09/2012 02:10:58 PM 749 Views
No. Not with that attitude. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:03:32 PM 364 Views
*throws public tantrum* *NM* - 25/09/2012 10:39:22 PM 352 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see - 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM 845 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times. - 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM 649 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it? - 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM 1081 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip. - 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM 1081 Views
you sure you saw the right replay? - 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM 759 Views
Think so, yeah. - 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM 882 Views
from another angle -- pun intended - 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM 754 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip? - 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM 932 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug* - 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM 982 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily. - 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM 797 Views
did you even read that article??? - 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM 800 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...." - 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM 1104 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me either way, you're still wrong - 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM 884 Views
That is not an argument. - 28/09/2012 02:26:58 AM 697 Views

Reply to Message