Active Users:786 Time:01/02/2026 06:10:39 AM
I have seen enough of it, and while I did not write Cannolis response, I easily could have. Joel Send a noteboard - 26/09/2012 02:06:45 AM
His reads a lot like the first one I wrote after seeing the play on YouTube; the only difference is that I did not specifically say then that Tate had both hands on the ball at the start of the catch, because I thought that was pretty obvious (evidently not.)

This: http://www.readandfindout.com/community/messageboard/262010/
and this: http://www.readandfindout.com/community/messageboard/262017/ read very similarly (not that I am accusing Cannoli of parroting my comments, rather, the logic is very straightforward and reasonable IF one knows the rules.)

Any beefs should be directed at the Competition Committee who created the rule decades ago, not at the refs who correctly applied it Monday.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM 718 Views
I was gonna keep it to one thread, but hell, I'll join yours. - 25/09/2012 05:24:26 AM 821 Views
Link? Clip? - 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM 780 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM 491 Views
Here's a link. - 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM 879 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM 695 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:52:55 AM 924 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 06:13:46 AM 880 Views
youtube link - 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM 906 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD. - 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM 780 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened - 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM 1044 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver. - 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM 1383 Views
watch a better replay if you can - 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM 841 Views
Have now; still not convinced. - 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM 885 Views
that's ok. you're still wrong - 26/09/2012 04:12:56 AM 894 Views
I know you are but what am I? *MN* - 26/09/2012 04:48:47 AM 837 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM 408 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited. - 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM 988 Views
Wait, you're not in Houston? *NM* - 26/09/2012 01:42:45 AM 424 Views
Not since the Texas Sesquicentennial, no. - 26/09/2012 01:45:29 AM 759 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees... - 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM 958 Views
Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM 977 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM 874 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball. - 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM 800 Views
There are good views on nfl.com. Will link. - 26/09/2012 02:16:51 AM 957 Views
Thanks; I still do not see much to change my mind. - 26/09/2012 02:32:43 AM 887 Views
The last call was a joke. - 25/09/2012 06:52:59 AM 838 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year - 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM 895 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too..... - 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM 843 Views
They can't reverse that call. - 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM 930 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete - 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM 909 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM 535 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM 442 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM 405 Views
Just so you can get this information without namecalling ... - 25/09/2012 04:18:41 PM 810 Views
No I mean he hasn't seen the replay over and over on ESPN *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:21:46 PM 411 Views
I have seen enough of it, and while I did not write Cannolis response, I easily could have. - 26/09/2012 02:06:45 AM 840 Views
Interesting. What is the rule with arguing refs? - 25/09/2012 05:18:35 PM 766 Views
That response was disturbingly like my thoughts on the play. - 26/09/2012 01:49:37 AM 852 Views
As a Seahawks fan. - 25/09/2012 02:10:58 PM 810 Views
No. Not with that attitude. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:03:32 PM 392 Views
*throws public tantrum* *NM* - 25/09/2012 10:39:22 PM 374 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see - 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM 908 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times. - 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM 711 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it? - 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM 1143 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip. - 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM 1144 Views
you sure you saw the right replay? - 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM 820 Views
Think so, yeah. - 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM 980 Views
from another angle -- pun intended - 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM 815 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip? - 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM 1007 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug* - 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM 1044 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily. - 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM 857 Views
did you even read that article??? - 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM 857 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...." - 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM 1276 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me either way, you're still wrong - 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM 959 Views
That is not an argument. - 28/09/2012 02:26:58 AM 759 Views

Reply to Message