Active Users:645 Time:01/02/2026 07:51:24 AM
from another angle -- pun intended moondog Send a noteboard - 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM
the position you keep arguing is that -- in the specific situation when a defender catches a pass for an interception and a receiver is right there to try to stop him from making the interception -- if the receiver tries to take the ball away from the defender at any point after the interception has been made, all he has to do is keep one hand on the ball while they go to the ground and it is a simultaneous catch.

there is no point where tate has CLEAR possession of the ball but there are several points where jennings does. in the last frame of the picture above the ball is clearly against jennings' body and tate is underneath him. not only that, but tate's right arm is ON JENNINGS and not the ball. i can think of no ruling ever in the history of the NFL where this was considered a simultaneous possession until monday night.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM 719 Views
I was gonna keep it to one thread, but hell, I'll join yours. - 25/09/2012 05:24:26 AM 822 Views
Link? Clip? - 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM 781 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM 492 Views
Here's a link. - 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM 880 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM 696 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:52:55 AM 925 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 06:13:46 AM 881 Views
youtube link - 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM 908 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD. - 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM 781 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened - 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM 1045 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver. - 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM 1384 Views
watch a better replay if you can - 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM 842 Views
Have now; still not convinced. - 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM 886 Views
that's ok. you're still wrong - 26/09/2012 04:12:56 AM 895 Views
I know you are but what am I? *MN* - 26/09/2012 04:48:47 AM 838 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM 410 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited. - 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM 989 Views
Wait, you're not in Houston? *NM* - 26/09/2012 01:42:45 AM 425 Views
Not since the Texas Sesquicentennial, no. - 26/09/2012 01:45:29 AM 759 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees... - 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM 959 Views
Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM 978 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM 875 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball. - 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM 801 Views
There are good views on nfl.com. Will link. - 26/09/2012 02:16:51 AM 958 Views
Thanks; I still do not see much to change my mind. - 26/09/2012 02:32:43 AM 888 Views
The last call was a joke. - 25/09/2012 06:52:59 AM 840 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year - 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM 895 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too..... - 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM 844 Views
They can't reverse that call. - 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM 931 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete - 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM 910 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM 536 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM 443 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM 406 Views
Just so you can get this information without namecalling ... - 25/09/2012 04:18:41 PM 811 Views
No I mean he hasn't seen the replay over and over on ESPN *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:21:46 PM 412 Views
Interesting. What is the rule with arguing refs? - 25/09/2012 05:18:35 PM 767 Views
That response was disturbingly like my thoughts on the play. - 26/09/2012 01:49:37 AM 853 Views
As a Seahawks fan. - 25/09/2012 02:10:58 PM 811 Views
No. Not with that attitude. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:03:32 PM 393 Views
*throws public tantrum* *NM* - 25/09/2012 10:39:22 PM 375 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see - 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM 908 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times. - 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM 712 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it? - 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM 1144 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip. - 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM 1146 Views
you sure you saw the right replay? - 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM 820 Views
Think so, yeah. - 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM 981 Views
from another angle -- pun intended - 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM 817 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip? - 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM 1008 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug* - 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM 1045 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily. - 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM 858 Views
did you even read that article??? - 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM 858 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...." - 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM 1276 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me either way, you're still wrong - 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM 960 Views
That is not an argument. - 28/09/2012 02:26:58 AM 760 Views

Reply to Message