Active Users:505 Time:13/12/2025 10:31:29 PM
The more fool you. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM
I specifically said at the beginning of my post that I was trying to get into this argument. I wanted to get a sampling of opinions on polygamy from a group that is not hung up on the traditional view of marriage. The reason I specifically addressed supporters of gay marriage is because I know what most other people will say.


Lots of supporters of gay marriage affect an objective or even-handed position, when they are really just shilling for a special interest for the group with whom they sympathize. It is not really about "equality" and personal definitions and choices (since they are trying to strip everyone else of the right to choose to recognize their role-playing games as real or refuse the same), it is about obtaining a special privilege for homosexuals, which they agree with that group obtaining, whether out of sentiment or personal interest.

Marriage is a thing. You don't change its nature by adding a word to the label and making it appear that the true nature of the thing is actually only as aspect of the real nature. That is the view of proponents of marriage. The proponents of alternative domestic arrangements have their own agendas and are as beholden to them as anyone else. They will not be any more fair or impartial, because their reasons for their choice are just as personal and egocentric as anyone's.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1543 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 938 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 922 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 911 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 900 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 813 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 549 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 870 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 583 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 455 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 456 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 931 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 442 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 886 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 889 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 849 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 908 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 826 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 910 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 718 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 863 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 970 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 822 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 833 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 901 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 960 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1243 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 869 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 1047 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 928 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 837 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 771 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 766 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 864 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 390 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 754 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 980 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 823 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 885 Views

Reply to Message