Active Users:336 Time:16/05/2024 11:52:48 AM
But we know very well that it doesn't have dire commercial consequences. Burr Send a noteboard - 25/10/2012 07:17:55 PM
I defy you to find one example in the 1950s conservative South of someone going out of business because they refused to hire African-American as something other than a janitor.

For the modern age, I point at Chick Filet, which is doing just fine despite its clearly bigoted perspective and policies.

It simply isn't true that discrimination will work itself out on its own. Hell, that's the same argument we made about slavery. How long are we going to make that argument?
||||||||||*MySmiley*
Only so evil.
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1315 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 719 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 692 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 672 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 678 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 606 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 366 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 682 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 393 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 350 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 347 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 644 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 343 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 649 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 668 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 618 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 694 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 610 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 705 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 533 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 629 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 731 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 618 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 612 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 681 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 735 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1001 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 646 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 810 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 690 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 623 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 552 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 556 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 633 Views
Re: The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 07:15:17 PM 578 Views
Like you said: By referring to "all invididuals" (or, better, "persons" or "citizens.") - 24/10/2012 04:14:55 PM 603 Views
But we know very well that it doesn't have dire commercial consequences. - 25/10/2012 07:17:55 PM 657 Views
Depends on where you look, and for how long. - 26/10/2012 01:19:00 AM 610 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 285 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 522 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 724 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 618 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 647 Views

Reply to Message