Active Users:431 Time:13/09/2025 09:10:53 AM
Re: The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." Burr Send a noteboard - 23/10/2012 07:15:17 PM
That covers a lot of ground, and I tried to avoid going there after getting into it a while back over equal opportunity housing and related laws. The bottom line is that we cannot, or should not, ban bigotry itself. Free democratic societies tend to gradually reduce bigotry by ostracizing bigots (which is not "bigotry against bigots" because it rejects behavior, not people.) What we cannot do is let the majority dictate what everyone believes or how they choose to dispose of their own property. Unfortunately, that means businesses ought to be able to post "Irish need not apply" signs if willing to deal with the loss of trade such practices provoke.


I'll bite. How should the Civil Rights Act have been written in order to reverse stagnant attitudes about racial employment when it came to African-Americans such that the law read in a way that could still be universalized -- without referring to a grouping phrase like "on the basis of race"? If you referred instead to "all individuals" or "no individuals," it seems to me you'd be invariably crossing the line where employers can't hire or fire anyone at all for reasons other than direct qualifications. That might work for a very generic business, but any business going for a certain image or flavor would have a tough time of it. Law firms would have to hire people who refuse to wear suits, for instance, just because those people may be well qualified at law.

(Of course, maybe I am just an old fuddy-duddy in my own way.)
||||||||||*MySmiley*
Only so evil.
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1481 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 875 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 854 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 838 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 835 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 764 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 520 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 826 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 556 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 424 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 425 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 869 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 412 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 809 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 826 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 773 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 846 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 767 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 866 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 694 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 804 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 893 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 775 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 768 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 838 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 904 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1177 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 803 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 986 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 861 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 778 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 712 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 720 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 790 Views
Re: The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 07:15:17 PM 734 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 358 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 690 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 894 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 778 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 827 Views

Reply to Message