Active Users:617 Time:02/06/2026 08:01:20 AM
The more fool you. Cannoli Send a noteboard - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM
I specifically said at the beginning of my post that I was trying to get into this argument. I wanted to get a sampling of opinions on polygamy from a group that is not hung up on the traditional view of marriage. The reason I specifically addressed supporters of gay marriage is because I know what most other people will say.


Lots of supporters of gay marriage affect an objective or even-handed position, when they are really just shilling for a special interest for the group with whom they sympathize. It is not really about "equality" and personal definitions and choices (since they are trying to strip everyone else of the right to choose to recognize their role-playing games as real or refuse the same), it is about obtaining a special privilege for homosexuals, which they agree with that group obtaining, whether out of sentiment or personal interest.

Marriage is a thing. You don't change its nature by adding a word to the label and making it appear that the true nature of the thing is actually only as aspect of the real nature. That is the view of proponents of marriage. The proponents of alternative domestic arrangements have their own agendas and are as beholden to them as anyone else. They will not be any more fair or impartial, because their reasons for their choice are just as personal and egocentric as anyone's.
Cannoli
"Sometimes unhinged, sometimes unfair, always entertaining"
- The Crownless

“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Deus Vult!
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1618 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 1021 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 1012 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 997 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 978 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 897 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 588 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 945 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 626 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 497 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 507 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 1013 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 478 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 973 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 972 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 934 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 981 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 898 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 1003 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 759 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 943 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 1048 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 903 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 921 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 980 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 1031 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1326 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 955 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 1152 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 1012 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 930 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 844 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 846 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 961 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 424 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 859 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 1103 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 905 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 969 Views

Reply to Message