Active Users:1464 Time:29/10/2025 02:44:49 AM
But we know very well that it doesn't have dire commercial consequences. Burr Send a noteboard - 25/10/2012 07:17:55 PM
I defy you to find one example in the 1950s conservative South of someone going out of business because they refused to hire African-American as something other than a janitor.

For the modern age, I point at Chick Filet, which is doing just fine despite its clearly bigoted perspective and policies.

It simply isn't true that discrimination will work itself out on its own. Hell, that's the same argument we made about slavery. How long are we going to make that argument?
||||||||||*MySmiley*
Only so evil.
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1507 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 905 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 881 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 868 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 859 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 784 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 535 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 847 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 565 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 436 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 437 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 894 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 425 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 842 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 853 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 803 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 874 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 790 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 890 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 703 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 832 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 918 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 798 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 802 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 871 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 935 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1209 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 829 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 1029 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 881 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 805 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 746 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 744 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 826 Views
Re: The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 07:15:17 PM 753 Views
Like you said: By referring to "all invididuals" (or, better, "persons" or "citizens.") - 24/10/2012 04:14:55 PM 775 Views
But we know very well that it doesn't have dire commercial consequences. - 25/10/2012 07:17:55 PM 835 Views
Depends on where you look, and for how long. - 26/10/2012 01:19:00 AM 835 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 371 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 716 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 945 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 806 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 853 Views

Reply to Message