Active Users:504 Time:13/12/2025 10:31:37 PM
But we know very well that it doesn't have dire commercial consequences. Burr Send a noteboard - 25/10/2012 07:17:55 PM
I defy you to find one example in the 1950s conservative South of someone going out of business because they refused to hire African-American as something other than a janitor.

For the modern age, I point at Chick Filet, which is doing just fine despite its clearly bigoted perspective and policies.

It simply isn't true that discrimination will work itself out on its own. Hell, that's the same argument we made about slavery. How long are we going to make that argument?
||||||||||*MySmiley*
Only so evil.
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1543 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 938 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 922 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 911 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 900 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 813 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 549 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 870 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 583 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 455 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 456 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 931 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 442 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 886 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 889 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 849 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 908 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 826 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 910 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 718 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 863 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 970 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 822 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 833 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 901 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 961 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1243 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 869 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 1048 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 928 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 837 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 771 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 766 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 864 Views
Re: The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 07:15:17 PM 777 Views
Like you said: By referring to "all invididuals" (or, better, "persons" or "citizens.") - 24/10/2012 04:14:55 PM 800 Views
But we know very well that it doesn't have dire commercial consequences. - 25/10/2012 07:17:55 PM 861 Views
Depends on where you look, and for how long. - 26/10/2012 01:19:00 AM 876 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 390 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 754 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 980 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 823 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 885 Views

Reply to Message