The 2 things you attempted to "cite" were absolute nonsense and proved nothing.
HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 31/12/2012 06:00:00 PM
I think I'm tempted to just automatically link that into all gun-control talks and refuse to discuss anything further till they've read it, because I really haven't seen let alone typed anything so logical, accurate, comprehensive, and well said on the subject. Thanks for the link.
I read it a week or two ago, so will continue.

It is a long piece, and I do not feel like digging through all of its tortured "logic" like I did a week or two ago; once was more than sufficient.
The China incident was used in the article to illustrate that guns are not needed to create an "atrocity" thus restricting them does not prevent one. I have no idea what you were trying to illustrate.
Your reasoning behind the importance of an off-duty cop being the one to stop a mall shooting as opposed to a civilian also escapes me as the quality of training received by police officers and their qualitative performance in stress situations was discussed in the article. The point was that the shooting was stopped by someone who happened to be at the location when the shooting began, as opposed to the body count that would have resulted from the inevitable delay before a uniformed police response could have arrived.
Keep trying
Poll: 54 percent view NRA favorably
28/12/2012 04:23:35 AM
- 1079 Views
Hahahaha. That is full of shit. OMG. Thanks for the laughs. *NM*
28/12/2012 06:30:08 AM
- 460 Views
I have this to say about that...
28/12/2012 07:10:52 AM
- 887 Views
That was rather long but probably one of the best things I've read this year
28/12/2012 02:31:24 PM
- 644 Views
Excellent article by a knowledgable individual armed with facts. *NM*
28/12/2012 04:36:23 PM
- 311 Views
See my response to Novo.
28/12/2012 06:28:00 PM
- 746 Views
please cite the errors, manipulations, or lies.
28/12/2012 09:30:28 PM
- 698 Views
I cited two in response to her, and those were just the ones I remember off the top of my head.
28/12/2012 11:07:36 PM
- 837 Views
If you can't remember them, then don't claim them *NM*
29/12/2012 03:08:08 AM
- 370 Views
Two just from memory is enough to substantiate my claim.
29/12/2012 03:35:49 AM
- 714 Views
'Substantiate your claim'? I don't think you're lying, I just don't feel any reason to be swayed...
29/12/2012 04:00:10 AM
- 615 Views
The 2 things you attempted to "cite" were absolute nonsense and proved nothing.
31/12/2012 06:00:00 PM
- 692 Views
Re: I have this to say about that...
28/12/2012 05:23:44 PM
- 824 Views
Never point a gun at anything you are not going to shoot, nor shoot anything you do not mean to kill
28/12/2012 06:13:20 PM
- 717 Views
Still losing the gun debate and it's driving you a little crazy isn't it!
28/12/2012 06:40:51 PM
- 584 Views

Gallup: 58% want more gun control; Ipsos: 70% want more gun control, 90% want background checks.
28/12/2012 10:29:50 PM
- 733 Views
..and 100% want to win the lottery, but it isn't going to happen.
05/01/2013 02:17:50 PM
- 775 Views
Re: I have this to say about that...Actually, modern military weapons are constructed to wound
29/12/2012 08:43:49 PM
- 828 Views
Yeah, uh, no. Not until you do some serious background checks on teachers.
29/12/2012 01:00:20 AM
- 761 Views
GOP estimates of teacher competence have increased to the point of giving them concealed guns.
29/12/2012 02:36:08 AM
- 851 Views
You know the GOP is unlikely to object to background check on teachers, the unions might
29/12/2012 02:56:06 AM
- 716 Views
his premise is "there's already too many guns so why bother trying anything at all now"
07/01/2013 06:27:20 PM
- 722 Views
I don't think that's his sole premise but it's also quite true
07/01/2013 07:05:20 PM
- 749 Views
i think you're missing a piece of the puzzle
07/01/2013 07:23:02 PM
- 674 Views
I'm not missing it, I just don't think it's wise or especially moral
07/01/2013 09:36:05 PM
- 724 Views
moral has nothing to do with it, imho
07/01/2013 11:26:00 PM
- 770 Views
Data is data my friend. Please feel free to present your own data if you would like. *NM*
28/12/2012 05:49:09 PM
- 336 Views
Is that the same Gallup that said 54% of America would vote Romney?
28/12/2012 06:15:43 PM
- 796 Views

Once again data is data.....feel free to cite other polling data. *NM*
28/12/2012 06:38:29 PM
- 327 Views
The goddamn frigging election. *NM*
28/12/2012 07:13:04 PM
- 333 Views
Oh, was the NRA running for something? Good grief, was a ridiculous reach. *NM*
28/12/2012 08:07:56 PM
- 336 Views
No, but it shows Gallup polls are horseshit. *NM*
28/12/2012 08:48:12 PM
- 329 Views
No it doesn't, it only shows that Romney was more awful of a candidate than Obama was. *NM*
28/12/2012 09:14:00 PM
- 346 Views
Not according to Gallup, just most US voters; Gallup DOES say 58% of the US wants more gun control.
28/12/2012 10:22:19 PM
- 894 Views
Yes. Most of us aren't against guns per se; we're against the inane concepts of gun "shows"
29/12/2012 01:06:50 AM
- 632 Views
Exactly, crazy libs like Joel want to get rid of all guns, but normal Americans.....
29/12/2012 01:36:00 AM
- 662 Views
Too bad the radical fringe on both sides drowns us both out so well.
29/12/2012 02:25:31 AM
- 786 Views
Previous polling failures by Gallup are evidence for the claim that Gallup polls are flawed.
29/12/2012 01:05:08 AM
- 786 Views
Gallup was Romney +1 with +/- 4% on Election Day.....turned out Obama +3.
29/12/2012 01:33:45 AM
- 626 Views
So what I don't understand about this whole teachers with gun thing
30/12/2012 12:42:05 AM
- 765 Views
It would strictly be voluntary
30/12/2012 03:02:18 AM
- 733 Views
You seriously don't think a linebacker can take a gun off a 5' teacher?He can just punch her.
30/12/2012 09:45:05 AM
- 729 Views
He can already punch her, not all schools are high schools and that's not the norm for spree killers
30/12/2012 03:05:55 PM
- 810 Views
Leveling that playing field is much of the point of guns.
05/01/2013 05:43:47 PM
- 771 Views
You aren't familiar with guns if you think that a large male can't disarm a woman who has one.
07/01/2013 10:14:21 AM
- 733 Views
Well Paul Ali Slater didn't, disarming is risky, and he seems familiar enough with them to me *NM*
07/01/2013 01:25:28 PM
- 377 Views