Active Users:934 Time:01/12/2025 04:19:27 PM
Twice I was almost robbed, and my parents were robbed several times. HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 26/03/2013 01:35:11 PM

View original post
The four times someone has had a gun or claimed they had a gun in my store to rob us, they weren't in the store long enough to see whether others were armed or not. I have been fortunate enough to not be there, but we do all watch the footage. The criminals that come in our store do what they have to do and run. My location has a reputation for positively IDing and deterring scum. Rarely in the last few years has many of them been in the store long. And I talk about all forms of criminals in my store, not just armed robbers. But, the ones that have robbed us, haven't spent my time in the store and they are always intent on the cashier and not what is occurring around them.

Generally speaking the criminal does check out any other patrons, and if they see something they don't like go elsewhere. This happened the first time with me when a group of people came in at exactly the right time and the scum-bag went to the store next door instead. The second time I was looking straight into into the guys eyes when he was trying to make up his mind (BTW I'm 6'5" and and athletic 220, a nice guy, but at first glance I do not fit the category of "victim" ). He decided to try elsewhere also and went back to his buddy's car (which they had backed into a parking spot at the far end of the building, my first clue they were up to no good, could they have been MORE obvious. Amusingly enough that prevented them from seeing the cop car that had parked on the other side of the building to do paperwork). I do not know the circumstances that occurred with my parents as they have never told me the details, and my personal sample is way to small to make absolute conclusions from. However, there have been studies, and they support what I mentioned before.

Of course none of that matters with the truly drugged out or crazy. If one of them come in your odds of death (or worse) go way up and there aint much you can do to prevent them from trying, they just don't care. The only chance you have is either being able to physically overpower them or someone else being there who can, but someone is getting hurt, probably badly.

This message last edited by HyogaRott on 26/03/2013 at 01:35:32 PM
Reply to message
US Senate Democrats - already cave-in on the gun control bill - 19/03/2013 10:44:55 PM 1451 Views
right wingers are always point out there is no point legislating cosmetics - 19/03/2013 11:52:28 PM 864 Views
Late Term Abortion, Terry Schavio? *NM* - 19/03/2013 11:57:25 PM 425 Views
You know, what you are hoping for will not make any difference whatsoever..... - 20/03/2013 01:07:58 AM 733 Views
"if at first you don't succeed..... fuck it...." - 20/03/2013 04:10:47 AM 742 Views
I can agree with some of what you stated, though I prefer "logical" to "right winger" - 20/03/2013 01:56:34 AM 785 Views
you are correct. i forget sometimes that there **is** some common ground here.... - 20/03/2013 04:19:13 AM 702 Views
There'd be more common ground if anything were ever offered in exchange for concessions - 20/03/2013 02:20:26 PM 741 Views
Ben Franklin said it best... - 20/03/2013 04:14:45 PM 709 Views
interesting how that quote always applies to so many things, isn't it? - 20/03/2013 05:14:30 PM 705 Views
Absolutely - 21/03/2013 12:20:45 AM 770 Views
if there have to be concessions, what do you recommend? - 20/03/2013 05:10:53 PM 824 Views
That would depend, something of equal value - 20/03/2013 09:13:23 PM 719 Views
when very little is being given up, how do we determine equal value? - 20/03/2013 10:31:59 PM 987 Views
Outside of legislature people do it all the time, its called negotiation and bargaining - 21/03/2013 10:53:22 AM 733 Views
Re: Outside of legislature people do it all the time, its called negotiation and bargaining - 21/03/2013 07:16:57 PM 801 Views
Re: Outside of legislature people do it all the time, its called negotiation and bargaining - 21/03/2013 08:53:20 PM 888 Views
some answers - 21/03/2013 10:04:45 PM 1111 Views
Re: some answers - 21/03/2013 11:33:21 PM 892 Views
Re: the NRA - 22/03/2013 07:44:06 PM 736 Views
This is a matter of POV bias - 22/03/2013 09:04:25 PM 663 Views
we will have to agree to disagree then - 22/03/2013 10:12:02 PM 720 Views
I already knew we disagreed, that's why I suggested bargaining - 22/03/2013 11:11:04 PM 722 Views
i am merely taking the NRA at their word(s) - 23/03/2013 12:13:18 AM 659 Views
Re: i am merely taking the NRA at their word(s) - 23/03/2013 02:04:39 AM 920 Views
i am not trying to sway, just come to an understanding - 23/03/2013 03:03:14 PM 877 Views
I think you've actually managed to widen our gap - 23/03/2013 03:53:55 PM 902 Views
yes, because it was a failed attempt to re-boot and start the debate from the beginning..... - 24/03/2013 03:33:05 AM 1081 Views
I've difficulty seeing the point of going back to first principles but I'm willing to try - 24/03/2013 02:13:29 PM 718 Views
this has been more insightful than our previous tit-for-tat responses, actually - 26/03/2013 07:40:27 PM 703 Views
There's always room for reaosnable dialogue - 26/03/2013 10:09:58 PM 971 Views
even so, we are at yet another impasse.... - 26/03/2013 11:37:04 PM 804 Views
Probably, I don't know why that surprises you - 27/03/2013 02:02:54 AM 669 Views
I can see the argument for limiting magazine capapcity but it would be hard to enforce - 20/03/2013 05:11:51 PM 725 Views
It would be a stupid meaningless "feel good" law as changing magazines takes almost no time. *NM* - 21/03/2013 01:05:34 PM 385 Views
I can't argue that - 21/03/2013 06:14:09 PM 728 Views
canada's magazine restrictions are credited with reducing fatalities in a mass shooting - 21/03/2013 07:22:45 PM 799 Views
what is high capacity? - 21/03/2013 11:09:09 PM 692 Views
according to the law, whatever is larger than the legal limit - 21/03/2013 11:31:08 PM 718 Views
There is no gun control, only gun *centralization* - 20/03/2013 05:32:59 PM 749 Views
Regarding guns sold which are used in crimes - 20/03/2013 10:41:21 PM 713 Views
Your specified legal requirements already exist. *NM* - 21/03/2013 02:05:12 AM 377 Views
So what other stipulations would you put into effect? *NM* - 21/03/2013 02:42:53 AM 359 Views
none- I'd simply actually punish criminals instead of trying to "reform" them. *NM* - 21/03/2013 01:13:29 PM 379 Views
Criminals need to be punished AND reformed for their inevitable release back into society *NM* - 21/03/2013 11:58:20 PM 352 Views
I've always been rather partial to the criminal justice system in Heinlein's Starship Troopers novel - 22/03/2013 02:42:09 AM 800 Views
Yeah you're right. Let's just kill everybody who commits a crime - 22/03/2013 02:46:49 AM 735 Views
*NM* - 22/03/2013 10:55:36 AM 382 Views
That's not in Starship Troopers - 22/03/2013 12:51:44 PM 732 Views
Yeah, there was a small number of capital offenses (13 I think), most not specified. - 22/03/2013 05:27:11 PM 705 Views
14 then, he lists stupidity as one in another book - 22/03/2013 07:35:13 PM 745 Views
That's why we NEED to reform prisoners - 22/03/2013 10:33:08 PM 686 Views
It is probably an option we should work harder to develop - 23/03/2013 12:38:33 AM 735 Views
Out of curiosity. Is anyone against background checks at gun shows, and if so, why? *NM* - 21/03/2013 09:38:59 AM 366 Views
Not in principle but somewhat in practice - 21/03/2013 11:25:25 AM 883 Views
For what its worth.... - 21/03/2013 03:13:44 PM 696 Views
Personally, I am worried about criminals with guns. BUT... - 22/03/2013 03:44:47 PM 1014 Views
What you are not factoring into your though process is that most criminals feels the same way. - 24/03/2013 12:56:04 PM 1002 Views
I realize that can be the case. But... - 25/03/2013 03:32:59 PM 985 Views
Twice I was almost robbed, and my parents were robbed several times. - 26/03/2013 01:35:11 PM 619 Views

Reply to Message