Let me rephrase... None of them could have prevented a FUTURE attack.
HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 18/04/2013 04:37:43 PM
View original post
magazine size would have saved more children though, especially one particular 9-year old girl in arizona shot during the Giffords attack, and the 11 kids who escaped when lanza reloaded at Newtown. but of course, if we had known we were trying to change the past with new laws then they are by nature doomed to fail since it's impossible to undo what has already been done when it comes to others' actions.
magazine size would have saved more children though, especially one particular 9-year old girl in arizona shot during the Giffords attack, and the 11 kids who escaped when lanza reloaded at Newtown. but of course, if we had known we were trying to change the past with new laws then they are by nature doomed to fail since it's impossible to undo what has already been done when it comes to others' actions.
Additionally your assertion that his reloading of his weapon allowed children to escape is not accurate. There are assumptions that this MAY be the case, but no official word yet from the police. Additionally, even the sories that make this assertion state that it was eithter his weapopn jamming, or him making an ERROR while reloading that allowed them time. Changing the magazine on a firearm (barring error) is an action of at most a couple seconds and will not give anyone time for a meaningful action. With practice there are many people who can change magazines so rapidly you won't even notice them doing so. Lanza reloaded frequently leaving many partially full magazines behind.
This message last edited by HyogaRott on 18/04/2013 at 04:53:44 PM
Obama embarrassed - Senate Gun Control Bill Fails.....
- 18/04/2013 03:51:37 AM
926 Views
More importantly, they failed becasue it was just knee-jerk "must do something publicly" BS.
- 18/04/2013 01:55:43 PM
491 Views
there is no law anywhere which can undo the past
- 18/04/2013 03:12:14 PM
448 Views
Let me rephrase... None of them could have prevented a FUTURE attack.
- 18/04/2013 04:37:43 PM
992 Views
nothing can prevent future attacks. the goal is to stop criminals getting guns and reduce fatalities
- 18/04/2013 06:07:32 PM
390 Views
EXACTLY, which is why all this legistation was garbage
- 18/04/2013 08:47:35 PM
521 Views
that's right. because our right to be blown away trumps life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness
- 18/04/2013 09:06:32 PM
488 Views
Turn off your partisin blinders and listen to logic for once.
- 19/04/2013 12:41:12 AM
484 Views
logic dictates that *ALL* gun sales be decided by background check
- 19/04/2013 10:27:50 PM
377 Views
Okay, if you say 'logic dictates' like that, you'd better present the actual logic stream
- 20/04/2013 02:52:07 AM
478 Views
you won't accept evidence because you're ok with proliferation of guns to criminals
- 22/04/2013 07:31:32 PM
648 Views
+1 - This is "feel good" legislation that accomplishes nothing..... *NM*
- 18/04/2013 06:06:07 PM
268 Views
yep. republican obstructionism and cowardice knows no bounds....
- 18/04/2013 03:07:46 PM
466 Views
- 18/04/2013 03:15:15 PM
521 Views
- 18/04/2013 03:15:15 PM
521 Views
You're being rather partisan here. And wrong to denigrate Republicans.
- 18/04/2013 03:55:34 PM
543 Views
sorry, who is the minority party again? it's not the democrats
- 18/04/2013 06:19:43 PM
527 Views
On legislation that seeks to restrict/reimagine/redefine
- 18/04/2013 07:30:47 PM
587 Views
this was about regulation, it was not a new amendment.
- 18/04/2013 08:41:12 PM
591 Views
perhaps you should discover a dictionary.
- 18/04/2013 09:01:36 PM
485 Views
PPP, ABC, CNN, Rasmussen and Gallup are all similarly biased on background checks? sure.... *NM*
- 18/04/2013 09:16:28 PM
207 Views
WHAT!?!?!! you mean to tell me that news organizations are biased??? Nah! it can't be...
- 19/04/2013 12:49:15 AM
415 Views
+1 - if you want to redesigned the 2nd amendment, do it via the constitutional amendment.....
- 18/04/2013 09:09:35 PM
396 Views
a womans RIGHT to choose, but you don't have any problems with restrictions there
- 18/04/2013 09:21:14 PM
429 Views
The state has a law that requires Drs that perfom abortions have admitting priledges to a hospital.
- 19/04/2013 12:47:41 AM
485 Views
they also tried to pass zoning laws which would have meant a complete remodel of the building
- 19/04/2013 10:35:03 PM
477 Views
Tried to pass infers that the said laws did not, thus are meningless.
- 20/04/2013 05:11:59 AM
390 Views
*NM*
Well surprise, surprise, surprise, those amendments WERE debated, that's how they came up for a vote
- 18/04/2013 08:53:40 PM
422 Views
and it's still the republican obstructionism which doomed them to failure
- 18/04/2013 09:07:51 PM
534 Views
I LOVE obstructionism when it stops stupid ideas. *NM*
- 18/04/2013 09:10:54 PM
200 Views
well, you *are* the authority on stupid ideas, i'll give you that much! 
*NM*
- 19/04/2013 11:01:31 PM
203 Views
*NM*
- 19/04/2013 11:01:31 PM
203 Views
I'd forgotten, Democrats never filibuster
- 18/04/2013 09:33:41 PM
487 Views
right, i forget republicans don't abuse the rules they are only preventing the gov't from working
- 18/04/2013 09:39:11 PM
397 Views
It bugs the hell out of me how you don't see that comment as being Dem/Rep interchangeable
- 18/04/2013 11:38:26 PM
375 Views
That's because he is a partisan hack.....nothing more, nothing less. *NM*
- 19/04/2013 05:02:36 AM
219 Views
So does your ignorance on how your government process functions.
- 18/04/2013 04:46:53 PM
433 Views
don't play dumb, you are better than that
- 18/04/2013 06:24:22 PM
413 Views
Nope, nope, nope and nope. A+ job on ignorantly parroting popular political talking poinits though
- 18/04/2013 08:50:35 PM
487 Views
Very Enlightened of you, "Agree with me or you're an Obstrucionist and Coward" *NM*
- 18/04/2013 09:31:06 PM
236 Views
i am only acting on your advice to "call a spade a spade"
- 18/04/2013 09:42:22 PM
384 Views
No, you're venting anger by demeaning the opposition on grounds that your own side uses too
- 18/04/2013 10:30:24 PM
549 Views
venting? yes. my "side"? i don't think you understand where i'm coming from
- 19/04/2013 10:56:28 PM
482 Views
If you don't want to be seen as partisan, don't attack republicans specifically and repeatedly
- 20/04/2013 06:41:57 AM
502 Views
if you don't want republicans attacked, you should convince them to stop taking insane positions
- 22/04/2013 07:09:32 PM
514 Views
They're insane to you because they're from the GOP, you'd call it insane if we said water was wet
- 22/04/2013 08:15:00 PM
909 Views
"an important" is not at all the same thing as "the most important."
- 18/04/2013 04:10:47 PM
590 Views
I agree, BS polling like this (by either side) annoys me.
- 18/04/2013 04:56:44 PM
377 Views
actually.....
- 18/04/2013 06:25:31 PM
524 Views
99.9 going once... 99.9 going twice... SOLD to the beady eyed farrot faced guy in the back row.
- 18/04/2013 09:04:06 PM
437 Views
Statistics lie 0% of the time, people lie or see what they want to see 99% of the time *NM*
- 18/04/2013 09:23:17 PM
210 Views
It is a silly poll
- 18/04/2013 09:21:25 PM
528 Views
I don't mind the poll, just the interpretation.
- 18/04/2013 10:27:37 PM
520 Views
That's sort of the point, you don't poll about the other critters with the 900 pound gorilla around
- 18/04/2013 11:46:00 PM
464 Views