Active Users:552 Time:10/06/2026 02:15:30 PM
You obviously don't get it. The police ARE bound to treat everyone fairly and ethically regardless. everynametaken Send a noteboard - 15/03/2010 03:54:27 AM
You are not a private citizen. You are not afforded the same rights or privileges as a private citizen. You can say that they had no right to inform her officers all you like, but that isn't the case. They had every right to do so, and did nothing wrong or unethical in doing so.


It does not matter what her status with the military is/was. The police are bound to treat her just as they would any other citizen of the United States. The only difference I can possibly think of is if she were arrested for something then they would have to contact her superiors to let them know where she was. Since that type of relationship does not exist between employer and employee in the civilian world then there is nothing analogous there. That example aside it is not the duty, the responsibility, or the job of the police to report anything in this case to her supervisors. They did it in retaliation for her not helping them track down her "wife". Roland is right, they were simply being dickish and in doing so unethical.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
Lesbian sgt. discharged after police tell military - 13/03/2010 10:43:06 PM 1109 Views
The military is entitled to know about all legal proceedings on its personnel, and the details - 13/03/2010 11:08:18 PM 589 Views
Re: The military is entitled to know about all legal proceedings on its personnel, and the details - 13/03/2010 11:37:30 PM 612 Views
well she did have a third option - 14/03/2010 12:05:06 AM 587 Views
Her marriage was an important detail - 14/03/2010 12:38:29 AM 580 Views
Re: Her marriage was an important detail - 14/03/2010 06:38:05 PM 594 Views
you're assuming the military are treated like actual citizens. - 14/03/2010 06:50:14 PM 559 Views
Basically. *NM* - 14/03/2010 06:54:14 PM 301 Views
really? I was really hoping someone would point out how wrong I was. *NM* - 14/03/2010 07:01:45 PM 317 Views
It's not as bad as it sounds *NM* - 14/03/2010 11:13:05 PM 286 Views
Agreed. It's restrictive at times, but usually fair. *NM* - 15/03/2010 12:30:13 AM 283 Views
Yep, definitely harsh, but also fair *NM* - 15/03/2010 12:54:34 AM 278 Views
Define fair - 15/03/2010 03:08:42 AM 557 Views
actually, I think it is as bad as it sounds. - 15/03/2010 02:14:21 AM 507 Views
Because if you treated soldiers like civilians, they wouldn't be very effective. *NM* - 15/03/2010 02:49:19 AM 283 Views
*shrug* I don't believe it has to be that way. - 15/03/2010 03:40:08 AM 508 Views
- 15/03/2010 10:28:32 PM 752 Views
Matter of perspective - 15/03/2010 03:13:21 AM 560 Views
*snort* there's "Rules" like any job has - 15/03/2010 03:34:51 AM 553 Views
Re: *snort* there's "Rules" like any job has - 15/03/2010 04:02:46 AM 575 Views
if someone is going to sign away their life and limb. - 15/03/2010 04:05:36 AM 653 Views
Re: if someone is going to sign away their life and limb. - 15/03/2010 04:48:03 AM 548 Views
very* - 15/03/2010 04:51:07 AM 629 Views
Re: very* - 15/03/2010 05:02:28 AM 533 Views
You can get out of the military anytime in the first six months or so without any consequences. *NM* - 15/03/2010 05:25:43 AM 360 Views
I'm less concerned about "Getting out" - 15/03/2010 12:31:49 PM 603 Views
Actually, in the contract when you first sign up... - 15/03/2010 05:55:48 PM 729 Views
as long as it's in the contract...and not glossed over. - 15/03/2010 06:00:38 PM 536 Views
The military is different - 14/03/2010 06:53:28 PM 680 Views
Re: The military is different - 15/03/2010 12:34:47 AM 537 Views
You obviously don't get it. There is no right to privacy as a member of the military. Period. - 15/03/2010 12:43:58 AM 521 Views
You two are arguing past each other - 15/03/2010 03:14:28 AM 508 Views
My point remains the same.... - 15/03/2010 06:27:32 AM 543 Views
You obviously don't get it. The police ARE bound to treat everyone fairly and ethically regardless. - 15/03/2010 03:54:27 AM 568 Views
No no no, I think you're missing a big point - 15/03/2010 02:50:33 AM 532 Views
Actually, I believe she also violated federal law too - 15/03/2010 03:38:26 AM 683 Views
Re: Actually, I believe she also violated federal law too - 15/03/2010 04:01:29 AM 562 Views
Jurisdiction - 15/03/2010 04:21:08 AM 599 Views
Aren't they already pursuing across state lines though? - 15/03/2010 04:46:34 AM 551 Views
and you are still missing my main point. - 15/03/2010 03:49:26 AM 557 Views
I don't care about DADT, and I never mentioned it - 15/03/2010 07:15:27 AM 564 Views
Wow...how completely wrong you are. - 15/03/2010 05:42:32 PM 509 Views
You want to cite when that was changed? - 15/03/2010 06:27:47 PM 563 Views
Marriage Question - 15/03/2010 07:26:34 PM 485 Views
Re: Marriage Question - 15/03/2010 07:54:24 PM 531 Views
I can't tell you when it was changed specifically... - 15/03/2010 09:09:46 PM 498 Views
Re: I can't tell you when it was changed specifically... - 15/03/2010 09:15:41 PM 524 Views
wait, why does this military have that right? - 15/03/2010 10:03:14 PM 506 Views
Why does or why should? *NM* - 15/03/2010 10:22:11 PM 288 Views
both, really. *NM* - 15/03/2010 10:28:36 PM 272 Views
Basically what snoop said *NM* - 15/03/2010 11:07:17 PM 258 Views
Can't cite you regs, don't know them and I have been out for a number of years now. - 16/03/2010 12:17:58 AM 477 Views
Re: Can't cite you regs, don't know them and I have been out for a number of years now. - 16/03/2010 12:33:33 AM 510 Views
Somebody brought up a valid point, though... - 16/03/2010 01:01:18 AM 615 Views
Re: Somebody brought up a valid point, though... - 16/03/2010 01:22:36 AM 663 Views
Does that mean you're backtracking on a number of your earlier statements? - 16/03/2010 01:35:49 AM 726 Views
Not really - 16/03/2010 02:07:36 AM 566 Views
Looks like you're missing one of my points too, then. - 16/03/2010 02:40:50 AM 857 Views
Re: Looks like you're missing one of my points too, then. - 16/03/2010 02:57:03 AM 550 Views
Actually she did NOT follow the rules - 14/03/2010 06:04:32 AM 597 Views
Bottom line: The law is stupid. - 15/03/2010 04:20:23 AM 536 Views
A spouse's criminal record can effect a soldier's clearance. - 15/03/2010 05:30:09 AM 649 Views
none? - 15/03/2010 12:36:36 PM 562 Views
Perhaps the bit where the police may have informed the military out of spite. - 15/03/2010 06:30:06 PM 596 Views
see and here's my thing - 15/03/2010 10:04:43 PM 686 Views
Re: see and here's my thing - 15/03/2010 10:45:10 PM 620 Views
i guess that's just me then I tend to tuck important documents into single locations - 15/03/2010 10:47:12 PM 594 Views
Until yesterday - 15/03/2010 11:34:09 PM 499 Views
Re: Until yesterday - 15/03/2010 11:42:37 PM 534 Views
Don't ask, don't tell is stupid and outdated in a modern country. - 15/03/2010 11:02:33 AM 548 Views
Exactly - 15/03/2010 09:04:44 PM 495 Views
Re: Exactly - 15/03/2010 10:11:14 PM 598 Views
Yeah, - 15/03/2010 10:43:10 PM 553 Views

Reply to Message