In fact, for the most part all Isaac and I have been saying is that the police were doing what is normal by notifying the base.
The only thing I've mentioned is that police reports and blotters involving military members are turned over to the base. Always. The police frequently call the base when there is an incident involving a member of the military and inform the military person's command. They did their job and followed standard protocol. There is nothing unethical or dickish about it, it's simply the way the system works. The military and the police work hand in hand very often in cases involving members of the military. If a member of the military isn't cooperating with the police, they will contact that person's command.
The only part of this that could remotely be "dickish" or "unethical" is if the information about the marriage license was included out of spite. As others have mentioned though, the marriage is a relevant fact in the case.
Would I put it past the police in SD to do it out of spite? No, I wouldn't. I'm from the area and I'm well aware of the fact that there is no lack of racism and homophobia in the area. So is it possible that they did it out of spite? Sure, it's possible. It's also quite possible that they were simply doing their job and sharing information with the base, as is common practice all over the country.
I have close ties to both the military and the police...to me this is all very cut and dry. To someone who has never been in the military and has never experienced the differences that that life entails it may seem out of place and unfair...but every member of the military is well aware that any incident involving the police is going to be reported to the base. It's something you learn to accept and live with. As an outsider looking in...I don't know, maybe it seems wrong...but as someone who has been on the inside, I understand the policy of the police informing the base, and think that it's very necessary.
The only thing I've mentioned is that police reports and blotters involving military members are turned over to the base. Always. The police frequently call the base when there is an incident involving a member of the military and inform the military person's command. They did their job and followed standard protocol. There is nothing unethical or dickish about it, it's simply the way the system works. The military and the police work hand in hand very often in cases involving members of the military. If a member of the military isn't cooperating with the police, they will contact that person's command.
The only part of this that could remotely be "dickish" or "unethical" is if the information about the marriage license was included out of spite. As others have mentioned though, the marriage is a relevant fact in the case.
Would I put it past the police in SD to do it out of spite? No, I wouldn't. I'm from the area and I'm well aware of the fact that there is no lack of racism and homophobia in the area. So is it possible that they did it out of spite? Sure, it's possible. It's also quite possible that they were simply doing their job and sharing information with the base, as is common practice all over the country.
I have close ties to both the military and the police...to me this is all very cut and dry. To someone who has never been in the military and has never experienced the differences that that life entails it may seem out of place and unfair...but every member of the military is well aware that any incident involving the police is going to be reported to the base. It's something you learn to accept and live with. As an outsider looking in...I don't know, maybe it seems wrong...but as someone who has been on the inside, I understand the policy of the police informing the base, and think that it's very necessary.
Lesbian sgt. discharged after police tell military
- 13/03/2010 10:43:06 PM
1109 Views
The military is entitled to know about all legal proceedings on its personnel, and the details
- 13/03/2010 11:08:18 PM
589 Views
Re: The military is entitled to know about all legal proceedings on its personnel, and the details
- 13/03/2010 11:37:30 PM
612 Views
Her marriage was an important detail
- 14/03/2010 12:38:29 AM
580 Views
Re: Her marriage was an important detail
- 14/03/2010 06:38:05 PM
594 Views
you're assuming the military are treated like actual citizens.
- 14/03/2010 06:50:14 PM
559 Views
Basically. *NM*
- 14/03/2010 06:54:14 PM
301 Views
really? I was really hoping someone would point out how wrong I was. *NM*
- 14/03/2010 07:01:45 PM
317 Views
It's not as bad as it sounds *NM*
- 14/03/2010 11:13:05 PM
286 Views
actually, I think it is as bad as it sounds.
- 15/03/2010 02:14:21 AM
507 Views
Because if you treated soldiers like civilians, they wouldn't be very effective. *NM*
- 15/03/2010 02:49:19 AM
283 Views
Matter of perspective
- 15/03/2010 03:13:21 AM
560 Views
*snort* there's "Rules" like any job has
- 15/03/2010 03:34:51 AM
553 Views
Re: *snort* there's "Rules" like any job has
- 15/03/2010 04:02:46 AM
575 Views
if someone is going to sign away their life and limb.
- 15/03/2010 04:05:36 AM
653 Views
You can get out of the military anytime in the first six months or so without any consequences. *NM*
- 15/03/2010 05:25:43 AM
360 Views
I'm less concerned about "Getting out"
- 15/03/2010 12:31:49 PM
603 Views
The military is different
- 14/03/2010 06:53:28 PM
680 Views
Re: The military is different
- 15/03/2010 12:34:47 AM
537 Views
You obviously don't get it. There is no right to privacy as a member of the military. Period.
- 15/03/2010 12:43:58 AM
521 Views
You obviously don't get it. The police ARE bound to treat everyone fairly and ethically regardless.
- 15/03/2010 03:54:27 AM
568 Views
No no no, I think you're missing a big point
- 15/03/2010 02:50:33 AM
532 Views
Actually, I believe she also violated federal law too
- 15/03/2010 03:38:26 AM
683 Views
and you are still missing my main point.
- 15/03/2010 03:49:26 AM
557 Views
I don't care about DADT, and I never mentioned it
- 15/03/2010 07:15:27 AM
565 Views
You're forbidden from marrying your own gender in the first place. She knew that.
- 14/03/2010 06:05:37 AM
533 Views
Wow...how completely wrong you are.
- 15/03/2010 05:42:32 PM
509 Views
You want to cite when that was changed?
- 15/03/2010 06:27:47 PM
563 Views
I can't tell you when it was changed specifically...
- 15/03/2010 09:09:46 PM
498 Views
Re: I can't tell you when it was changed specifically...
- 15/03/2010 09:15:41 PM
524 Views
wait, why does this military have that right?
- 15/03/2010 10:03:14 PM
506 Views
Why does or why should? *NM*
- 15/03/2010 10:22:11 PM
288 Views
Not sure of the US's reasoning, though I would assume it is as in other countries,
- 15/03/2010 10:31:38 PM
498 Views
Can't cite you regs, don't know them and I have been out for a number of years now.
- 16/03/2010 12:17:58 AM
477 Views
Re: Can't cite you regs, don't know them and I have been out for a number of years now.
- 16/03/2010 12:33:33 AM
510 Views
Somebody brought up a valid point, though...
- 16/03/2010 01:01:18 AM
615 Views
Re: Somebody brought up a valid point, though...
- 16/03/2010 01:22:36 AM
663 Views
Does that mean you're backtracking on a number of your earlier statements?
- 16/03/2010 01:35:49 AM
726 Views
- 16/03/2010 01:35:49 AM
726 Views
Not really
- 16/03/2010 02:07:36 AM
566 Views
A spouse's criminal record can effect a soldier's clearance.
- 15/03/2010 05:30:09 AM
649 Views
none?
- 15/03/2010 12:36:36 PM
562 Views
Perhaps the bit where the police may have informed the military out of spite.
- 15/03/2010 06:30:06 PM
596 Views
see and here's my thing
- 15/03/2010 10:04:43 PM
686 Views
Re: see and here's my thing
- 15/03/2010 10:45:10 PM
620 Views
i guess that's just me then
I tend to tuck important documents into single locations
- 15/03/2010 10:47:12 PM
594 Views
I tend to tuck important documents into single locations
- 15/03/2010 10:47:12 PM
594 Views
Re: i guess that's just me then
I tend to tuck important documents into single locations
- 15/03/2010 11:05:59 PM
634 Views
I tend to tuck important documents into single locations
- 15/03/2010 11:05:59 PM
634 Views
Don't ask, don't tell is stupid and outdated in a modern country.
- 15/03/2010 11:02:33 AM
548 Views
Aww. Is the homo crowd upset that their marital status is being treated EXACTLY like everyone else?
- 15/03/2010 10:25:42 PM
548 Views


