No, I don't, because expired patents would drive it if nothing else did.
Joel Send a noteboard - 15/03/2010 06:32:55 AM
What would happen to new drugs if the US congress passed a law that you could not sell drugs for more money in the US then you did in other industrialized nations? You don't think new drug development would be impacted by that? It doesn't matter where the drugs are developed what matters is where are the profits for those developments coming from.
Which is why drug companies already fight so hard for special exemptions from US and other patent law. But, once again, the biggest argument against that is that drug companies already spend a very small portion of their outlay on R&D, an amount several times smaller than what they spend on advertising.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Oh my god...I'm a socialist!
- 05/03/2010 02:46:17 PM
698 Views
Just remind yourself how good the government is with its other efforts
- 05/03/2010 03:00:26 PM
410 Views
And remember that some of the biggest health insurance companies are already "non-profits".
- 05/03/2010 03:18:45 PM
394 Views
The problem with "look how bad govt. programs are" is it ignores the "starve the beast" theory.
- 05/03/2010 05:51:50 PM
497 Views
You really think taking the money oput of the system won't affect innovation?
- 05/03/2010 10:09:20 PM
396 Views
those drugs would probably still get developed, and at about the same rate as before
- 06/03/2010 07:14:07 AM
389 Views
Re: those drugs would probably still get developed, and at about the same rate as before
- 06/03/2010 09:37:44 AM
377 Views
just like taking the profit out of insurance will make healthcare affordable?
- 06/03/2010 12:12:25 PM
386 Views
No, I don't, because expired patents would drive it if nothing else did.
- 15/03/2010 06:32:55 AM
364 Views
Don't worry it isn't like we have free market economics in health care right now
- 05/03/2010 03:19:39 PM
425 Views
Hold on a sec.
- 05/03/2010 05:58:00 PM
427 Views
That's not really a socialist policy.
- 05/03/2010 03:24:59 PM
436 Views
True. The European far-right isn't really far-right (or even right) in economic terms. *NM*
- 05/03/2010 11:46:15 PM
159 Views
you don't seem to understand socialism. visit wikipedia and check it out there. *NM*
- 05/03/2010 05:16:02 PM
157 Views
Making healthcare universally accessible is not socialist...
- 05/03/2010 05:29:16 PM
394 Views
It is universally accessible now
- 05/03/2010 05:43:52 PM
411 Views
Ah, like the Rolls Royce is universally acceptable.
- 05/03/2010 05:52:59 PM
389 Views
BS *NM*
- 05/03/2010 06:08:52 PM
147 Views
BSS
- 05/03/2010 06:28:15 PM
383 Views
Random Thoughts
- 05/03/2010 06:31:00 PM
377 Views
For profit isn't automatically BAD, just an unwise panacea for essential services.
- 05/03/2010 05:45:36 PM
452 Views
Government run isn't automatically BAD, just an unwise panacea for essential services.
- 05/03/2010 06:30:14 PM
378 Views
Universal healthcare is good...
- 05/03/2010 10:13:01 PM
414 Views
great I was really hoping we could hear from a moron and you seem to fit the bill
- 05/03/2010 11:39:15 PM
398 Views
I think he was joking RT - note the
at the end of the message
*NM*
- 06/03/2010 09:23:45 AM
206 Views
at the end of the message
*NM*
- 06/03/2010 09:23:45 AM
206 Views
How does "Don't worry, it will never happen in America either way" sound?
- 05/03/2010 11:49:23 PM
398 Views

