Active Users:793 Time:10/06/2026 08:00:45 AM
No, I don't, because expired patents would drive it if nothing else did. Joel Send a noteboard - 15/03/2010 06:32:55 AM
What would happen to new drugs if the US congress passed a law that you could not sell drugs for more money in the US then you did in other industrialized nations? You don't think new drug development would be impacted by that? It doesn't matter where the drugs are developed what matters is where are the profits for those developments coming from.

Which is why drug companies already fight so hard for special exemptions from US and other patent law. But, once again, the biggest argument against that is that drug companies already spend a very small portion of their outlay on R&D, an amount several times smaller than what they spend on advertising.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Oh my god...I'm a socialist! - 05/03/2010 02:46:17 PM 698 Views
Just remind yourself how good the government is with its other efforts - 05/03/2010 03:00:26 PM 410 Views
The problem with "look how bad govt. programs are" is it ignores the "starve the beast" theory. - 05/03/2010 05:51:50 PM 496 Views
That works both ways - 05/03/2010 06:13:43 PM 461 Views
Re: That works both ways - 15/03/2010 06:28:45 AM 464 Views
You really think taking the money oput of the system won't affect innovation? - 05/03/2010 10:09:20 PM 394 Views
No, I don't, because expired patents would drive it if nothing else did. - 15/03/2010 06:32:55 AM 363 Views
Don't worry it isn't like we have free market economics in health care right now - 05/03/2010 03:19:39 PM 425 Views
Hold on a sec. - 05/03/2010 05:58:00 PM 427 Views
Well you should read somehting besides the Daily Kos - 05/03/2010 06:25:23 PM 401 Views
That's getting tiresome, since you know it doesn't apply. - 15/03/2010 07:13:38 AM 393 Views
Very true. *NM* - 05/03/2010 11:45:36 PM 155 Views
That's not really a socialist policy. - 05/03/2010 03:24:59 PM 436 Views
you don't seem to understand socialism. visit wikipedia and check it out there. *NM* - 05/03/2010 05:16:02 PM 157 Views
Tongue. In. Cheek. *NM* - 05/03/2010 05:47:40 PM 152 Views
Making healthcare universally accessible is not socialist... - 05/03/2010 05:29:16 PM 393 Views
It is universally accessible now - 05/03/2010 05:43:52 PM 410 Views
Ah, like the Rolls Royce is universally acceptable. - 05/03/2010 05:52:59 PM 389 Views
use more words becuase that statement makes no sense - 05/03/2010 06:27:04 PM 414 Views
... - 15/03/2010 06:34:57 AM 385 Views
BS *NM* - 05/03/2010 06:08:52 PM 147 Views
BSS - 05/03/2010 06:28:15 PM 383 Views
Random Thoughts - 05/03/2010 06:31:00 PM 377 Views
It is the over simplification I object to - 05/03/2010 06:59:29 PM 379 Views
Thus the BS comment - 05/03/2010 07:37:22 PM 397 Views
is this not a paradox you've proposed here? - 05/03/2010 06:25:08 PM 420 Views
Universal healthcare is good... - 05/03/2010 10:13:01 PM 413 Views
great I was really hoping we could hear from a moron and you seem to fit the bill - 05/03/2010 11:39:15 PM 398 Views
I think he was joking RT - note the at the end of the message *NM* - 06/03/2010 09:23:45 AM 206 Views
To much cold medicine *NM* - 06/03/2010 12:13:12 PM 160 Views
How does "Don't worry, it will never happen in America either way" sound? - 05/03/2010 11:49:23 PM 397 Views
Eww - 06/03/2010 11:39:04 PM 455 Views
no - 06/03/2010 11:42:47 PM 436 Views
The scariest ones are the ones who are both. - 06/03/2010 11:55:51 PM 503 Views
that and it is crawling with dirty forgieners - 07/03/2010 03:01:27 AM 415 Views

Reply to Message