Re: I am talking about one of the plagues not THE plague
lyringlas Send a noteboard - 07/04/2010 08:45:26 PM
I would make it not happen.
Rome doesn't resort to tactics which would result in their fall and the dark ages never happen. Europe doesn't go through the intellectual lull it did and religious dogma and irrationality isn't able to take over.
As a result, mankind is much further along today.
Rome doesn't resort to tactics which would result in their fall and the dark ages never happen. Europe doesn't go through the intellectual lull it did and religious dogma and irrationality isn't able to take over.
As a result, mankind is much further along today.
Didn't the Plauge happen several hundred years after the fall of Rome? Or am I just being an idiot and not quite getting what your saying?
In some cases, the same diseases were responsible for multiple instances of plague, and it's hard to accurately diagnose each of them hundreds or even thousands of years later. "Plague" killed Pericles and a host of others when Athens was besieged in the Peloponessian War; WHICH plague remains an open question.
I don't agree the Romes plague near the end is what killed it though; overextension and complacency during the Pax are more attractive candidates. Christian unity and the assimilation of so many "barbarian" German tribes kept Rome on life support and hid the decline for at least a century after its peak, but had the Empire been sustainable Constantinople would never have been founded.
The plague that came through Rome crippled its army, killing most of the young Roman soldiers. This eventually forced them to try and assimilate barbarian tribes and resort to the measures that kept it on life support.
Without the plague, Rome's population might have been strong enough to sustain Roman troops and a Roman identity, instead of seeding power to outsiders.
Of course, the reason Rome fell can be debated endlessly. I'm one of those that thinks it was the plague.
Either way, if Rome hadn't fallen like it did, I think we'd be better off by a lot today. But "Have Rome not fall like it did" doesn't sound like a very good reply

What are you talking about? This was how Rome thrived through its glory days: expansion, and delegation of military service. The amount of *actual* Romans from Latinum, and later even from the Italian peninsula serving in the provinces armies was negligible. The main principle of Roman military strategy was: conquer place A, take men and armies from place A and make them serve in place X, while having people from place X guarding place A. Then, after colonizing place A with people from place V, then conquer place B to give land to people from A...and continue in such a fashion to appease everyone. The heart of the empire, Rome, much like America, didn't really grasp the idea of warfare and the hardships that came with it, because the people living there were as far from the borders as possible.
I know I just did a survey, but this was too good to pass up.
- 07/04/2010 12:44:15 AM
865 Views
Myself: World War I.
- 07/04/2010 12:45:57 AM
738 Views
I don't think it's that simple.
- 07/04/2010 12:57:16 AM
688 Views
I see your point.
- 07/04/2010 01:02:33 AM
682 Views
True, one might even say *adding* a war there would've improved things.
- 07/04/2010 01:36:07 AM
643 Views
Re: True, one might even say *adding* a war there would've improved things.
- 07/04/2010 10:48:49 AM
650 Views
I had a teacher with an interesting theory related to that
- 07/04/2010 12:57:49 AM
528 Views
Well, at this time, it was pretty well accepted that Russia wasn't exactly a techinical power.
- 07/04/2010 01:04:35 AM
485 Views
The Plague
- 07/04/2010 12:52:33 AM
619 Views
Re: The Plague
- 07/04/2010 01:05:35 AM
516 Views
He must be talking about a different plague, but I'm not sure which one, either. *NM*
- 07/04/2010 01:37:32 AM
393 Views
Maybe; there were episodic plague epidemics before and after that time.
- 07/04/2010 02:05:18 AM
677 Views
I am talking about one of the plagues not THE plague
- 07/04/2010 02:50:25 AM
619 Views
Re: I am talking about one of the plagues not THE plague
- 07/04/2010 08:45:26 PM
612 Views
I'm so glad you have the time and inclination to type up these replies.
*NM*
- 08/04/2010 07:09:22 AM
390 Views
*NM*
- 08/04/2010 07:09:22 AM
390 Views
...?
- 08/04/2010 07:51:14 PM
526 Views
Sounds like he was thanking you for saving him the effort of writing a similar reply. *NM*
- 08/04/2010 09:28:55 PM
410 Views
OK, think this one's been pretty thoroughly covered in my absence.
- 13/04/2010 11:51:16 AM
677 Views
- 13/04/2010 11:51:16 AM
677 Views
The spread of Christianity
- 07/04/2010 12:55:29 AM
697 Views
Re: The spread of Christianity
- 08/04/2010 09:29:17 AM
535 Views
But wasn't Christianity the inspiration for a whole era of art? *NM*
- 08/04/2010 01:41:34 PM
483 Views
Re: But wasn't Christianity the inspiration for a whole era of art?
- 08/04/2010 01:44:36 PM
666 Views
The product of Christian inspiration was heavily Hellenistic in origin...
- 08/04/2010 07:54:12 PM
512 Views
The destruction of the Great Library.
- 07/04/2010 01:02:59 AM
591 Views
Internet spam sucks indeed.
- 07/04/2010 01:08:23 AM
690 Views
We'll never know; makes for fascinating speculative fiction.
- 07/04/2010 01:13:49 AM
643 Views
This whole topic is wild, it's something I sometimes think about.
- 07/04/2010 01:17:50 AM
627 Views
"Joel captures Alexandria! The Great Library is destroyed!" *NM*
- 07/04/2010 01:08:35 AM
261 Views
It's crazy to think that the human knowledge base doubles every 2 years...
- 07/04/2010 08:49:28 PM
487 Views
Literacy and communication have literally made a world of difference.
- 13/04/2010 09:25:45 AM
573 Views
if the giant meteor hadn't destroyed the dinosaurs...
- 07/04/2010 01:10:42 AM
555 Views
"FOR" global warming? Now there's a phrase I never thought I'd here!
- 07/04/2010 01:16:04 AM
473 Views
The spread of Islam
- 07/04/2010 01:26:11 AM
652 Views
oh aren't you clever. *NM*
- 07/04/2010 01:47:13 AM
370 Views
There's such a thing as being right for the wrong reasons, though I'm not sure he is.
- 07/04/2010 02:12:14 AM
470 Views
Wikipedia is of course not a scholarly source, but all the same...
- 07/04/2010 11:57:01 AM
624 Views
Fair enough.
- 07/04/2010 12:51:16 PM
613 Views
Re: The spread of Islam
- 08/04/2010 09:24:31 AM
689 Views
I...do not know.
- 07/04/2010 07:18:13 AM
523 Views
A lot of times, you change one thing, and everything changes- even the things you don't think about.
- 07/04/2010 12:26:51 PM
486 Views
Amusing that the underlying expectation seems to be more along political history lines
- 07/04/2010 12:56:49 PM
709 Views
Here's one that'll be more to your liking...
- 08/04/2010 10:40:53 AM
460 Views
Re: Here's one that'll be more to your liking...
- 08/04/2010 11:58:27 AM
493 Views
Uh...
- 08/04/2010 12:11:14 PM
653 Views
Re: Uh...
- 08/04/2010 12:15:20 PM
671 Views
The Devil is always in the details
- 08/04/2010 12:29:25 PM
614 Views
- 08/04/2010 12:29:25 PM
614 Views
Re: The Devil is always in the details
- 08/04/2010 12:32:34 PM
403 Views
- 08/04/2010 12:32:34 PM
403 Views
Not really
- 08/04/2010 01:07:57 PM
574 Views
Re: Not really
- 08/04/2010 01:10:16 PM
493 Views
Only to a degree
- 08/04/2010 01:27:22 PM
590 Views
Re: Only to a degree
- 08/04/2010 01:30:12 PM
700 Views
I was into cultural and religious history
- 08/04/2010 01:38:24 PM
596 Views
Re: I was into cultural and religious history
- 08/04/2010 01:41:31 PM
466 Views
Ha!
- 08/04/2010 01:49:23 PM
625 Views
- 08/04/2010 01:49:23 PM
625 Views
Re: Ha!
- 08/04/2010 01:51:28 PM
449 Views
- 08/04/2010 01:51:28 PM
449 Views
Since, surprisingly, no one's pointed it out yet, prehistory/=history.
- 13/04/2010 09:52:19 AM
596 Views
Re: I know I just did a survey, but this was too good to pass up.
- 07/04/2010 09:04:02 PM
494 Views
Science getting on the ball in the 40's and making superhumans *NM*
- 08/04/2010 05:31:34 AM
421 Views
The spread of peanut butter and jelly.
- 08/04/2010 07:12:21 AM
643 Views
I think two spreads that would be better to eliminate would be marmite and vegemite (sp).
- 08/04/2010 05:30:26 PM
609 Views
- 08/04/2010 05:30:26 PM
609 Views
The head of [Roman Catholic] Christianity.
- 08/04/2010 07:15:21 AM
600 Views
You completely missed the "pick 1" part of the question, didn't you? *NM*
- 08/04/2010 09:26:23 AM
377 Views
Well, techinically, I never said that you couldn't make multible posts, each discussing 1 thing. *NM*
- 08/04/2010 05:36:37 PM
351 Views
I'm fairly sure he was just mocking someone's earlier post "just thought it would be interesting..." *NM*
- 08/04/2010 08:06:56 PM
354 Views
I'm pretty sure of that too. *NM*
- 08/04/2010 08:33:46 PM
358 Views

