Are these like the "shreds of evidence" people threw up all over me about how corrupt Clinton is?
nossy Send a noteboard - 10/05/2017 04:35:29 PM
View original postThe uproar seems to be completely over the appearance of potential and hypothetical, or speculative, impropriety. To my mind that's just everyday political posturing. I'd be happy to hear if you have a legitimate concern because I just don't see one.
Of course it's political posturing. You can tell because each side is behaving in completely predictable ways in response. My personal concern is that I in no way believe it's only about Comey's past transgressions (as he was praised by Trump just before the election). Which leaves me many other questions, particularly if no special prosecutor is engaged. Unlike some others, I believe there is something to be investigated, or at least I'd like it to be proven to me that everything is hunky dory. Call it my Benghazi.
Comey was fired today..
- 10/05/2017 05:41:17 AM
1120 Views
It's hard to make this look good. And I'm dubious of their reasons. *NM*
- 10/05/2017 06:19:12 AM
208 Views
With the media emotionally tied to selling Trump chatted it will be a hard sell. *NM*
- 10/05/2017 05:20:27 PM
241 Views
The firing as such is one thing, but the timing raises major question marks.
- 10/05/2017 07:29:57 AM
478 Views
Especially since there are allegations that Trump didn't have reasons but ordered them to be found.
- 10/05/2017 08:20:05 AM
457 Views
What question marks? I know that is the talking point but they stop there
- 10/05/2017 05:24:59 PM
375 Views
It doesn't necessarily have to be about Trump personally.
- 10/05/2017 08:13:12 PM
523 Views
There is zero evidence that Flynn colluded with the Russians on the campaign
- 10/05/2017 09:36:20 PM
377 Views
Aren't you confusing several things?
- 11/05/2017 07:16:21 PM
354 Views
How many of those people telling there is something there despite any evidence are political enemies *NM*
- 13/05/2017 01:22:59 AM
285 Views
I read he found out by seeing it on the news.
- 10/05/2017 08:42:28 AM
529 Views
I heard he found out because he's one of Trump's twitter followers *NM*
- 10/05/2017 01:58:10 PM
227 Views
Mitch McConnell isn't worried, so I'm sure it's fine. *NM*
- 10/05/2017 03:53:58 PM
253 Views
Sarcasm aside, have you seen even a shred of evidence that it was improper?
- 10/05/2017 04:01:46 PM
456 Views
Are these like the "shreds of evidence" people threw up all over me about how corrupt Clinton is?
- 10/05/2017 04:35:29 PM
425 Views
When did we start investigating a sitting president when there is zero recurrence her was involved?
- 10/05/2017 05:34:50 PM
456 Views
When which now?
- 10/05/2017 06:10:11 PM
373 Views
Can you point to single piece of evidence tying Trump campaign worker's to the email hacks?
- 10/05/2017 09:47:00 PM
376 Views
Can *I*? No. But then I'm a landscape designer living in the UK.
- 10/05/2017 11:03:56 PM
384 Views
Let's just take that one extra step
- 11/05/2017 02:51:49 PM
426 Views
Heh, well that must be terrible for you. 
- 11/05/2017 03:40:16 PM
527 Views
- 11/05/2017 03:40:16 PM
527 Views
Not even the president is required to prove his innocence
- 11/05/2017 04:06:30 PM
432 Views
But firing the person leading an investigation isn't how to determine one's innocence, hence
- 11/05/2017 04:19:13 PM
408 Views
If the same people claiming it was suspicious weren't the same ones calling for him to be fired
- 11/05/2017 05:50:12 PM
451 Views
But the firing doesn't affect the investigation
- 11/05/2017 07:04:01 PM
354 Views
Seriously you are saying firing the person in charge of an investigation does not affect the
- 11/05/2017 09:23:38 PM
492 Views
I can't point to a single piece of evidence that you can see, but I can point to evidence that is in
- 11/05/2017 05:33:32 AM
437 Views
I can't prove that the NSA isn't using brain control waves but I still don't wear a tin foil hat *NM*
- 11/05/2017 04:09:57 PM
277 Views
I'm only surprised it didn't happen earlier
- 10/05/2017 03:56:10 PM
411 Views
Indeed it does. And a lot of people rather doubt Trump would nominate someone like that.
- 10/05/2017 08:00:53 PM
502 Views
That op-ed was a complete waste of time to read
- 11/05/2017 07:21:15 PM
354 Views
You should be glad I didn't go with the Guardian's take then. 
- 11/05/2017 08:00:32 PM
422 Views
- 11/05/2017 08:00:32 PM
422 Views
I think you're full of shit, too.
- 12/05/2017 06:25:59 AM
354 Views
The funny thing with Trump is...
- 17/05/2017 06:13:54 PM
651 Views
The drama isn't coming from the White House, though
- 17/05/2017 07:48:34 PM
411 Views
The drama is coming from two sources. Both of them located, at least in part, in the White House.
- 17/05/2017 09:02:15 PM
683 Views
Sorry that wss nothing but partisan babble *NM*
- 12/05/2017 02:30:36 AM
289 Views
Hint: when a good amount of Republicans are saying the same thing, the word is 'bipartisan'. *NM*
- 12/05/2017 07:26:16 AM
217 Views
You'd think some of the HRC diehard types would be cheering. *NM*
- 10/05/2017 10:24:28 PM
248 Views
A normal president would ask for a resignation instead of firing
- 11/05/2017 04:25:11 AM
386 Views
Sorry l all heard was two legs good four legs bad baaa baa baa *NM*
- 11/05/2017 05:53:21 PM
287 Views
"The river tells no lies, though standing on the shore the dishonest man still hears them." *NM*
- 11/05/2017 09:14:00 PM
822 Views
I'm sick to death of all this shit.
- 11/05/2017 05:10:26 PM
363 Views
Mookie do not be sick, and do not call upon the spectre of death onto yourself
- 12/05/2017 03:30:06 PM
341 Views
damned double post - ironic considering the subject line 
*NM*
- 12/05/2017 04:09:54 PM
232 Views
*NM*
- 12/05/2017 04:09:54 PM
232 Views
Says the guy who doubles post
- 12/05/2017 04:13:16 PM
359 Views
So Trump admits 48 hours later, Comey was fired due to Russia, yet he claimed earlier it was due to
- 12/05/2017 03:25:23 PM
382 Views
Hint call it what you well but when it the bias leads that hard it is nothing but agenda given propa *NM*
- 13/05/2017 01:28:12 AM
252 Views