exactly! then just cut military spending and there you go!
damookster Send a noteboard - 09/08/2018 06:17:35 PM
View original post
Of course, even if you taxed "the rich" at 100% and then took all their existing assets, it wouldn't be enough to pay but for the smallest part of this scheme.
Of course, even if you taxed "the rich" at 100% and then took all their existing assets, it wouldn't be enough to pay but for the smallest part of this scheme.
I would have more respect for Socialist candidates like Alexandria Octavio-Cortez if they simply admitted the only way to pay for their giveaways is to nationalize all banks and corporations and seize their assets. I would still hate what they represent but at least that would be honest.
Mook
*MySmiley*
"Bustin' makes me feel good!"
Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
*MySmiley*
"Bustin' makes me feel good!"
Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Millennials seem to like Democratic Socialism. But no one will like the bill.
08/08/2018 04:13:25 PM
- 886 Views
For a minute there...
08/08/2018 11:33:16 PM
- 434 Views
Nope
09/08/2018 12:11:13 AM
- 446 Views
Yes - some interesting points on the reason why your costs would remain higher.
09/08/2018 11:34:44 PM
- 408 Views
Doing infrastructure at the federal level is more complicated than people want to admit
10/08/2018 01:27:25 PM
- 423 Views
As someone living in North Alabama, our highways are pretty well maintained.
10/08/2018 06:30:28 PM
- 402 Views
The rich will finally just have to pay their fair share.
09/08/2018 05:16:28 PM
- 455 Views
exactly! then just cut military spending and there you go!
09/08/2018 06:17:35 PM
- 418 Views
At some point shuldn't we cut military spending?
10/08/2018 01:32:17 PM
- 393 Views
maybe
10/08/2018 01:42:48 PM
- 425 Views
I don't know the solution but the current system is unsustainable *NM*
15/08/2018 11:14:27 PM
- 196 Views
But would it even be a net gain?
16/08/2018 12:21:40 AM
- 399 Views
If it is just a question of spending money we can find more productive ways to do that
17/08/2018 02:20:43 PM
- 420 Views
And we all know that "fair share" is always "more", regardless of what they're paying. *NM*
09/08/2018 09:16:22 PM
- 206 Views
Sanders' Medicare for all idea costs $32.6 Trillion over the next 10 years
09/08/2018 08:12:27 PM
- 436 Views
How many people named "Ocasio-Cortez" are going to be paying the bill to any meaningful degree?
11/08/2018 11:38:20 PM
- 419 Views
Honest question?
15/08/2018 12:40:22 AM
- 426 Views
Ocasio-Cortez has been anointed as the new face of the Democratic Party. Not Tlaib. *NM*
15/08/2018 01:06:04 PM
- 180 Views
Why?
15/08/2018 01:47:38 PM
- 398 Views