Active Users:710 Time:24/03/2026 07:31:28 AM
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain damookster Send a noteboard - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM

this is a piss-poor example upon which to base your concluding assumption.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 893 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 587 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 627 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 576 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 580 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 387 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 591 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 524 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 561 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 589 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 603 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 565 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 721 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 585 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 582 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 588 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 600 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 570 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 568 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 551 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 559 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 270 Views

Reply to Message