Active Users:328 Time:02/07/2025 03:40:19 PM
Thank you. *NM* Legolas Send a noteboard - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM
Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 799 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 515 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 546 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 498 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 502 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 349 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 485 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 454 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 483 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 516 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 522 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 490 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 634 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 503 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 506 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 509 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 514 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 489 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 498 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 468 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 490 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 236 Views

Reply to Message