Active Users:268 Time:21/05/2024 03:10:19 AM
Sure, I agree. Legolas Send a noteboard - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM

View original postIt's your mom.

Sure.
View original postI mean, you're right that to refer to a person as 'it' when 'he' or 'she' or singular 'they' would do is insulting, but not correct that it is always wrong to refer to an adult as 'it', even when the person's gender is not in question. Because 'he', 'she' or 'they' will not always do.

The first part being the important one here. There are grammatical constructions where you would use 'it' for any and all persons, yes. When I talk about referring to adults as 'it', I'm talking about choosing to do so in the large majority of cases where the grammar allows you to choose between 'he', 'she' and 'they'.
Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 636 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 355 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 389 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 357 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 351 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 279 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 336 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 319 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 336 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 368 Views
Okay, sure. - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 357 Views
Interesting.... - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 343 Views
Because it is just contempt - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 481 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 347 Views
Who's on the phone? - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 352 Views
Sure, I agree. - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 359 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 366 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 342 Views
So? - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 354 Views
Re: So? - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 319 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 351 Views
Thank you. *NM* - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 169 Views

Reply to Message