Active Users:348 Time:11/05/2025 01:41:08 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
So? fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM

View original post
The reactions of the characters of the book are based on the character's perception. As a reader, we are privileged to know the totality of that character.

Precisely, so there's no ambiguity.


Based on that totality, "it" is appropriate based on the context.

No, it is not. I'm not sure what relevance Aran'gar being a character has to do with anything.

Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. Cannoli - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 771 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. damookster - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 497 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. TheCrownless - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 515 Views
I think for once you were unfairly called out on this based on your "history" TheCrownless - 13/11/2018 01:26:41 AM 537 Views
Re: I think for once you were unfairly called out on this based on your "history" Cannoli - 13/11/2018 02:40:05 AM 492 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. Legolas - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 474 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... Jeordam - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 473 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* TyrReborn - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 336 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? Legolas - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 463 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain damookster - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 435 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... Jeordam - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 460 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity Cannoli - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 496 Views
Okay, sure. Legolas - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 499 Views
Interesting.... Jeordam - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 475 Views
Because it is just contempt Roland00 - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 613 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. Legolas - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 473 Views
Who's on the phone? aerocontrols - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 483 Views
Sure, I agree. Legolas - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 489 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong fionwe1987 - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 483 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book HyogaRott - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 466 Views
So? fionwe1987 - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 470 Views
Re: So? HyogaRott - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 445 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post Cannoli - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 467 Views
Thank you. *NM* Legolas - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 226 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes