Active Users:181 Time:19/05/2024 07:45:29 AM
Re: Hmmm, Isaac Send a noteboard - 09/02/2010 07:20:02 AM
Boy, this reminds me of game 1B we played here at RAFO. Each of roles were killed off fairly quickly. Recent games haven't been that bad though. Game should be winnable, we just need to stay calm. In recent games we've had a bit more luck, we've lost vanillas for the first few deaths. Our biggest problem will be panic, we can't rush to lynch anyone. Yet, even with losing two of our biggest roles, I'm not too worried, we can do this. Night kills were really lucky, let's hope the other games don't end up like this.

So yeah, I don't know what we should do. I don't have any suspicions, and I don't know where we should go from here. Anyone got any ideas?


Well one silver lining with the town having taken such a pounding is that the NK factions will presumably be concentrating on trying to kill each other off, both by NK and by lynch since being in on a lynch that bags a DF or SK always helps one's claims at innocence. So we might have a bit of breathing room, while neither is likely to pass a chance ot kill a townie, they probably will be devoting efforts to ferreting each other out as opposed to framing a townie. From perosnal experience I can' testify that's it's very difficult to do both at once.

I wasn't in 1B or 2B, so I don't know the parallel, but we've hemhoraged roles before, it's always a blow but we've also had a lot of games where the roles didn't do much either and victory still happened. Quite often the doc never prevents and attack, though they do tend to let the cop RC, considering we've had DF RBers most games of late, odds are the DFs, if the cop claimed, would just RB them and whack someone else anyway, so normally of late an investigative role claiming just renders them vanilla and a townie dies anyway. Losing the back up cop only hurts us if the cop dies, and I suppose we might have a back up doc too. I'm guessing we have more roles left, besides the cop, besides the existance of a miller, just the fact that they all three deaths have been roled probably speaks to a higher density of roles, or insider knowledge. I wouldn't raise the point, but there are the MPD numbers, I don't believe Napoleon gave his and of course Blaine never said anything at all, but they may know something of what the numbers mean and had better odds by elimination. Alternatively, they might have thought players not saying anything might have indicated they were worried of exposing themselves as a role, that latter explanation holds even if the numbers really mean nothing at all... and I'd point out that we never got numbers for any of our trio of casualties, so they probably do mean notihng, however, that people thought they might mean something, and some didn't give them out, well, there are worse reasons to guess someone might be hiding themselves as roled. If nothing else, people who gave out their numbers, especially after it was raised that it might let the DFs find them, probably weren't too worried about exposure, and when you're striking basically at random anything helps, lynch or NK.

I imagine if FT hadn't dropped his bombshell, focus would have remained on MPD, and the DFs probably never shifted focus, because they didn't know if there was a SK or whatever and while they probably weren't surprised, it's likely they took FT's claim at face value and weren't very distracted by it. So they probably were trying to decipher if MPD meant anything, whereas the town and probably the SK were focused on FT and basically forgot MPD. It is fairly probable then that they might have used that as the basis for their attack. Just as reluctance to claim often highlights a DF, it also highlights roles, so I wouldn't be surprised if one or both of our night losses was targeted in whole or part for not giving a MPD number. I would guess that if that was the case, then it was probably napoleon, Blaine's silence on the matter wasn't very notable since he was just not around, so maybe the DF's killed napoleon for MPD reasons.

That seems like the likely allocation of NK regardless though, because I can't see three or four players conferencing about their NK and picking Blaine. Blaine's death just makes no sense, and that tends to indicate one player in isolation thinking something like 'The one person the doc won't protect, the watcher wouldn't watch, would be the guy who has been utterly silent, all kills benefit me anyway, maybe he's a role' whereas I'd think the DFs would have picked a target that made some sort of sense.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over. - 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM 3309 Views
List of Players - 08/02/2010 06:58:04 PM 1071 Views
This is great, thanks! *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:19:25 AM 672 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:25:25 AM 1134 Views
Crap! - 15/02/2010 03:26:24 AM 1071 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM 1246 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM 1013 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia? - 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM 1156 Views
I am not Hopper - 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM 1069 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME - 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM 1154 Views
Now that's a questionable claim. - 09/02/2010 02:36:25 AM 1124 Views
Hah! You underestimate my ego, madam! - 09/02/2010 06:25:28 AM 1014 Views
A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM 1113 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 10:31:32 PM 1101 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 11:23:07 PM 894 Views
Third Party - 08/02/2010 09:43:57 PM 952 Views
Re: Third Party - 08/02/2010 10:34:38 PM 1049 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM 1068 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 03:53:18 AM 1020 Views
I thinking Lynching F-T was the right thing to do. - 09/02/2010 04:45:13 AM 1046 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM* - 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM 672 Views
You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM 1035 Views
NO! - 09/02/2010 01:31:57 AM 1021 Views
Re: You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM 993 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM 1028 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM 1046 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM 1092 Views
Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:05:04 AM 1011 Views
Re: Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:50:41 AM 1118 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM 1047 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement. - 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM 1206 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family. - 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM 1039 Views
See, that way the betrayal is personal. - 09/02/2010 04:41:47 AM 1255 Views
Ouch *NM* - 09/02/2010 04:58:13 PM 653 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 01:02:30 AM 616 Views
Hypocop (Table) - 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM 1106 Views
Beetnemesis, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:17:10 AM 598 Views
Okay - 09/02/2010 01:29:09 AM 923 Views
Kronin, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:53:09 AM 556 Views
Isaac, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:12:07 AM 654 Views
Isaac, innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:37:54 AM 590 Views
Investigated fistofpainx, found him to be innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 06:27:37 AM 597 Views
DK, found her innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:48:11 PM 622 Views
Fox and Ravens, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 03:57:50 PM 583 Views
Vote Record (Table) - 09/02/2010 01:30:51 AM 1096 Views
I'll add: list of players who did NOT vote yesterday - 09/02/2010 06:46:38 AM 1066 Views
RBIRL - 09/02/2010 04:45:19 AM 1019 Views
Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM 1027 Views
Re: Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 07:20:02 AM 964 Views
Yeah, I agree with the Blaine rationalization - 09/02/2010 08:57:19 AM 1027 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh - 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM 892 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM 636 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM 599 Views
Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 04:57:26 PM 1157 Views
Re: Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 07:27:00 PM 948 Views
I want to throw this out here. - 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM 1056 Views
What changed your mind? *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM 579 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone. - 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM 1057 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 02:56:52 AM 527 Views
I thought you'd like that. *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:00:19 PM 525 Views
I was going to post a few thoughts here this morning... - 09/02/2010 01:49:26 PM 1027 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM 1084 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic". - 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM 934 Views
Good point. Is an arsonist usually a third party? *NM* - 10/02/2010 12:28:10 AM 571 Views
That's so arbitrary, though. - 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM 902 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante. - 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM 1119 Views
That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM 1065 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM 1083 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that - 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM 1063 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense. - 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM 1135 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable - 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM 986 Views
Oh, my bad then! *NM* - 10/02/2010 10:19:13 PM 625 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism - 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM 1333 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM* - 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM 611 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM* - 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM 622 Views
I was the best vigilante you guys have ever had! *NM* - 12/02/2010 02:19:57 AM 596 Views
The only vigilante we've ever had. - 12/02/2010 02:25:20 AM 971 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM* - 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM 588 Views
Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:19:10 AM 1039 Views
Re: Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:56:10 AM 1016 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:50:51 AM 1192 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 01:11:50 AM 997 Views
Because we have a SK *NM* - 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM 544 Views
I agree that we probably have a SK - 10/02/2010 07:50:33 PM 1009 Views
Nah, I was just saying *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:06:54 AM 613 Views
wait a minute - 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM 1037 Views
Sensors? *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:42:36 PM 519 Views
Another thing - 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM 1158 Views
F-T, I assume - 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM 985 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM* - 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM 624 Views
I don't think it could be a RB - 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM 1097 Views
Probably not, but not for that reason - 10/02/2010 08:32:57 PM 1058 Views
Huh. - 10/02/2010 09:11:29 PM 1049 Views
Did anyone get any messages last night? - 10/02/2010 08:23:03 PM 1023 Views
Nope *NM* - 10/02/2010 08:35:18 PM 588 Views
Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:14:46 PM 1032 Views
Re: Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:41:19 PM 1177 Views
RBIRL - 11/02/2010 04:52:12 PM 992 Views
Good luck! *NM* - 11/02/2010 07:05:40 PM 560 Views
Re: RBIRL - 11/02/2010 09:59:39 PM 1195 Views
We're stalling out a bit - 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM 985 Views
Yep. - 12/02/2010 02:58:02 AM 970 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine... - 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM 1074 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game - 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM 1217 Views
Yawn... - 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM 1185 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM 1150 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM 1063 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:24:40 AM 1006 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself - 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM 1174 Views
Dammit, I had a post and then it got deleted. - 14/02/2010 01:45:31 AM 1005 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again. - 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM 900 Views
Always happy to answer your questions - 14/02/2010 07:35:35 AM 920 Views
Thanks for the answers. - 15/02/2010 07:29:31 PM 1017 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:02:34 AM 1092 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:48:22 AM 989 Views
On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM 1048 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM 990 Views
Oh, right, I modded that one. - 14/02/2010 04:11:46 AM 970 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records - 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM 1060 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one - 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM 954 Views
I'm in second? Woo! - 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM 1033 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod - 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM 1191 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT. - 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM 1021 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you - 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM 1035 Views
Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM 897 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM 1264 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart. - 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM 1174 Views
Oh, the MHael Steve incident! - 15/02/2010 04:42:31 AM 1010 Views
The game? Oh, right, that. - 15/02/2010 04:41:43 AM 936 Views
Actually... - 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM 1112 Views
Sorry, it was my first game. - 16/02/2010 03:34:16 AM 1177 Views
That was my point actually. - 16/02/2010 06:25:17 AM 1101 Views
Those were the good old days. - 18/02/2010 01:21:44 AM 1055 Views
random thoughts - 15/02/2010 12:46:55 PM 982 Views
I wasn't in that game. - 18/02/2010 01:19:06 AM 984 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande - 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM 1274 Views
Argh... quote please - 12/02/2010 08:54:08 PM 1057 Views
Haha, fair enough - 12/02/2010 11:30:54 PM 909 Views
I was getting all set to defend myself - 13/02/2010 01:21:58 AM 1143 Views
RBIRL - 14/02/2010 06:11:55 AM 1085 Views
Back - 18/02/2010 02:14:25 AM 1117 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM 908 Views
Re: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM 1159 Views
That's giving up awfully early. - 15/02/2010 07:35:37 PM 949 Views
Never give up! Never surrender! - 15/02/2010 08:31:19 PM 1089 Views
Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM 1001 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM 985 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF - 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM 900 Views
I don't think so - 16/02/2010 12:09:13 AM 1031 Views
I assumed - 16/02/2010 12:14:16 AM 1026 Views
Re: I assumed - 16/02/2010 01:28:43 AM 1062 Views
In a way Isaac is right - 16/02/2010 05:24:08 AM 1035 Views
If he was the SK - 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM 1146 Views
How many games did you guys play on wotmania, anyway? - 15/02/2010 08:43:04 PM 992 Views
9 *NM* - 15/02/2010 08:53:23 PM 632 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM 1014 Views
Oh that's right! - 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM 994 Views
We just took that game over. - 15/02/2010 10:12:43 PM 1043 Views
Oh yeah, we owned that one - 15/02/2010 11:48:12 PM 940 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 1075 Views
Lol irony - 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM 1022 Views
what I thought was pretty funny - 16/02/2010 12:41:47 AM 1031 Views
Heh heh the Cairhienins would be proud *NM* - 16/02/2010 01:11:13 AM 604 Views
Oh, Isaac got High Seat there, didn't he? - 16/02/2010 01:33:05 AM 1026 Views
That was a fun one. - 18/02/2010 01:32:02 AM 1077 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people - 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM 1093 Views
well I really dont have anything worthwhile to say *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:06:11 PM 678 Views
Eh... not good enough - 16/02/2010 12:19:22 AM 1008 Views
Holiday weekend - 15/02/2010 11:49:37 PM 973 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing. - 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM 1126 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM 1225 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM 1056 Views
It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 04:46:54 AM 1110 Views
Re: It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 05:30:34 AM 1058 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched - 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM 1117 Views
Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM 1065 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM 1146 Views
Since when are you against traps? - 16/02/2010 04:07:05 PM 976 Views
Since game 4 or 5, roughly - 16/02/2010 10:57:19 PM 1031 Views
I'm glad it did too. - 16/02/2010 01:16:14 PM 1039 Views
Regarding Inactivity and whatnot - 16/02/2010 06:22:14 AM 1124 Views
RBIRL - exams Thursday *NM* - 17/02/2010 02:11:27 AM 618 Views
So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM 1044 Views
Re: So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 03:55:33 AM 1122 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7 - 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM 1093 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM 1175 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM 1035 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything - 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM 973 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off. - 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM 965 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM 973 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM 1141 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM 1017 Views
My post, "Re: Hieshyn" - 18/02/2010 06:32:12 PM 1183 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM 991 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it - 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM 1034 Views
A few thoughts - 19/02/2010 03:22:32 PM 963 Views
Alright then. - 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM 810 Views
EBWOP - 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM 1081 Views
Haha, I'm sorry - 19/02/2010 05:49:00 PM 966 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM 1101 Views
Naive? - 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM 1122 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick - 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM 1058 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like - 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM 875 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM 945 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM 925 Views
Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 06:03:18 AM 1007 Views
Re: Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 05:24:16 PM 987 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN! - 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM 997 Views
Hey. - 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM 1040 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:19:30 PM 1053 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 06:50:35 PM 949 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM 1145 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF - 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM 943 Views
Don't put words in my mouth. - 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM 1088 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM 618 Views
Well OK, a BIT more, because we know he was townie *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:34 PM 617 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM 593 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 18/02/2010 08:19:04 PM 566 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts? - 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM 1022 Views
I think that - 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM 1076 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions... - 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM 983 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM 1001 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM 941 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM 1063 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence. - 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM 968 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going - 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM 1008 Views
About voting - 19/02/2010 03:33:34 PM 1039 Views
Idk if that question about voting can be answered. - 20/02/2010 06:15:21 AM 1084 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM 1042 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM 1093 Views
I agree - 20/02/2010 02:52:53 PM 903 Views
Should be fine.. although, maybe only paraphrase? - 20/02/2010 02:03:30 AM 979 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no - 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM 977 Views
Seems pretty thorough to me! I pretty much agree. *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:12:40 AM 593 Views
After seeing this thread.... - 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM 922 Views
Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM 1023 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM 1115 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM 1133 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM 1194 Views
Well, these are as good a starting point as any. - 20/02/2010 05:22:34 PM 973 Views
I think quoting NBs from other games is okay. - 20/02/2010 05:15:55 AM 1005 Views
Quoting or paraphrasing is fine IMO *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:31:45 AM 654 Views
Fox and Ranagrande - 20/02/2010 06:30:53 AM 1100 Views
Some comments... - 20/02/2010 07:54:02 PM 1075 Views
Alright. - 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM 1072 Views
Thanks - 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM 919 Views
Re: Thanks - 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM 940 Views
Ranagrande *NM* - 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM 573 Views
Really? - 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM 1011 Views
Go back and look at the NB for yourself. *NM* - 21/02/2010 04:29:54 AM 647 Views
That's hilarious. *NM* - 21/02/2010 06:47:57 PM 599 Views
Re: Thanks - 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM 1021 Views
I do have a question - 21/02/2010 07:12:57 PM 1124 Views
A prosaic explanation- (and an objection) - 21/02/2010 09:13:43 PM 1072 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself. - 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM 973 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1066 Views
Not sure I follow - 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM 1079 Views
Because I might just be blinding myself here. - 22/02/2010 07:40:15 PM 1079 Views
Oh, okay. That does make sense. - 22/02/2010 07:52:10 PM 1196 Views
I think I do - 22/02/2010 07:47:56 PM 951 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1022 Views
EBWOP - sorry, double post *NM* - 21/02/2010 11:34:21 PM 590 Views
Items of note from my NB archive: - 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM 1143 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM 1190 Views
I'm feeling the same thing. - 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM 1024 Views
Re: I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 08:07:19 PM 1024 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 - 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM 1058 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis - 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM 1066 Views
That sounds about right to me. - 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM 1022 Views
(My two cents) - 22/02/2010 08:35:17 PM 1064 Views
Dude. - 22/02/2010 08:53:30 PM 1061 Views
Re: Dude. - 22/02/2010 09:45:52 PM 1015 Views
Thanks. - 23/02/2010 07:04:29 AM 1065 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM 1101 Views
You didn't read the entirety of my quote post did you? - 22/02/2010 07:42:14 PM 1062 Views
Actually, I do have a small confession to make about that... - 22/02/2010 08:14:08 PM 1149 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM 1180 Views
Fair enough - 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM 1097 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1048 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 999 Views
Numbers? - 22/02/2010 09:36:51 PM 1159 Views
Re: Numbers? - 22/02/2010 10:21:13 PM 1149 Views
I don't think he's innocent. OR a DF - 22/02/2010 10:42:16 PM 965 Views
Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM 1089 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:38:09 PM 1007 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM 984 Views
I will destroy the world - 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM 1110 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM* - 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM 487 Views
Ok, that's totally different... - 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM 990 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent. - 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM 1060 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM* - 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM 512 Views
No, this is my view: - 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM 1120 Views
And my view was: - 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM 983 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know - 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM 1053 Views
I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 01:52:07 AM 990 Views
Re: I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 06:47:45 AM 996 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM* - 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM 599 Views
Can I ask why? - 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM 1003 Views
I'd be very interested in seeing an explanation as well *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:04:30 PM 599 Views
Ditto. *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:09:31 PM 616 Views
My, my, how totally unexpected - 24/02/2010 01:01:42 PM 1064 Views
Reasoning would be nice *NM* - 24/02/2010 10:13:43 PM 600 Views
Eh? *NM* - 25/02/2010 01:47:19 AM 585 Views
Hieshyn I will DESTROY you - 27/02/2010 01:41:25 AM 1001 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn - 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM 1147 Views
You're right, Isaac. - 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM 1150 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM* - 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM 512 Views
Hieshyns and Foxes and Beets! Oh my! - 26/02/2010 02:59:51 PM 1106 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM 1072 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 06:10:33 AM 1068 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 07:00:02 AM 1124 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM 1148 Views
Here's what I'm getting from this: - 27/02/2010 06:49:22 AM 1029 Views
Could be - 27/02/2010 06:16:30 PM 1043 Views
Re: Could be - 27/02/2010 07:15:07 PM 1120 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS. - 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM 981 Views
Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:13:12 PM 1026 Views
Re: Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:40:16 PM 894 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM 1055 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:55:13 AM 962 Views
Gotcha, thanks. *NM* - 27/02/2010 08:07:21 AM 618 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM 1064 Views
Re: Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 08:24:14 PM 1235 Views
Interesting. - 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM 1020 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it - 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM 1022 Views
Oh, right. - 28/02/2010 04:32:13 AM 914 Views
Vote: ranagrande - 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM 981 Views
Hmmm - 27/02/2010 11:31:52 PM 922 Views
Re: Hmmm - 28/02/2010 12:41:07 AM 1053 Views
What, if anything, has changed? - 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM 1017 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM* - 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM 551 Views
A little joke - 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM 1606 Views
Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 05:41:14 AM 1139 Views
Re: Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 06:29:58 AM 1551 Views
Woah, that's a pretty sneaky trick with the quote links. - 28/02/2010 07:14:22 AM 973 Views
Oh, and RBIRL: midterms week. *NM* - 27/02/2010 09:35:25 PM 594 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text) - 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM 978 Views
Why do you keep calling my death inevitable? - 28/02/2010 02:51:26 AM 972 Views
Because you have often said you're a lightning rod - 28/02/2010 07:48:14 AM 1112 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis - 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM 997 Views
fair enough - 28/02/2010 04:40:02 AM 989 Views
Yeah, I would like an explanation. - 28/02/2010 05:00:55 AM 985 Views
Vote: beetnemesis - 01/03/2010 03:18:00 AM 1051 Views
EBWOP - 01/03/2010 03:20:24 AM 986 Views
"Jumpy?" - 01/03/2010 05:47:37 AM 915 Views
Re: "Jumpy?" - 03/03/2010 05:35:50 AM 1039 Views
I GUESS I'll contribute my opinion. - 28/02/2010 06:15:36 AM 1068 Views
What a rebel - 28/02/2010 07:52:50 AM 981 Views
me and beet - 28/02/2010 01:03:59 PM 1099 Views
my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM 1132 Views
Re: my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM 1165 Views
well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 04:03:26 AM 1062 Views
Re: well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 05:28:48 AM 939 Views
Do you get a ring for voting abstinence? - 01/03/2010 04:56:57 AM 1155 Views
LOL *NM* - 01/03/2010 05:26:14 AM 566 Views
RBIRL until thursday. - 01/03/2010 07:06:50 AM 944 Views
You undecided people really need to make up your minds - 01/03/2010 07:32:42 PM 1042 Views
Seriously, the suspense is killing me *NM* - 02/03/2010 05:30:26 PM 582 Views
Agreed, this is really getting ridiculous *NM* - 02/03/2010 08:06:12 PM 648 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up? - 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM 998 Views
Please - 02/03/2010 09:12:36 PM 1060 Views
- 02/03/2010 11:20:19 PM 1143 Views
Re: - 02/03/2010 11:49:21 PM 1060 Views
Did you unvote? - 03/03/2010 04:22:52 AM 1103 Views
I always forget that! - 03/03/2010 01:04:09 PM 988 Views
I'm sorry. - 03/03/2010 03:54:56 AM 1044 Views
But... I'm much more interesting than some stupid "book!" - 03/03/2010 04:11:02 AM 1014 Views
Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:25:27 AM 1061 Views
Re: Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:32:34 AM 954 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this - 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM 899 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days - 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM 891 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these. - 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM 950 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right. - 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM 958 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced - 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM 925 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok... - 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM 981 Views
Well you figured very wrong - 04/03/2010 01:57:09 AM 1115 Views
All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM 1078 Views
This is a very interesting development - 04/03/2010 02:22:46 AM 1100 Views
Ditto. - 04/03/2010 02:28:18 AM 1223 Views
Re: All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 03:46:38 AM 919 Views
Gosh. - 04/03/2010 04:01:04 AM 1030 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely. - 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM 1125 Views
We're only waiting on Bergioyn and Fist, I believe. - 04/03/2010 05:56:36 AM 1030 Views
Now we are down to Fist - 04/03/2010 03:47:22 PM 918 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case - 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM 1041 Views
You brought this upon yourself. - 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM 975 Views
Your fencing smiley has dulled my scathing retort - 03/03/2010 05:19:49 PM 1024 Views
- 03/03/2010 05:34:11 PM 1062 Views
I'm back. - 03/03/2010 07:32:24 PM 1064 Views
I'll give it a shot - 03/03/2010 08:19:01 PM 1089 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No' - 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM 1091 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:29:51 AM 628 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:31:43 AM 615 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:32:54 AM 541 Views
Re: Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:34:19 AM 586 Views
Ignore, hit 'reply' instead of 'edit' I think *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:36:02 AM 522 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 03:40:15 AM 645 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 04:44:27 AM 585 Views
No, sir *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:20:43 AM 672 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:25:10 AM 564 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 01:54:15 PM 606 Views
no *NM* - 05/03/2010 03:52:07 AM 607 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay - 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM 886 Views
To the roleblocker: - 05/03/2010 01:46:50 AM 1088 Views
That's everyone, Vote: Beetnemesis *NM* - 05/03/2010 04:06:03 AM 592 Views
I think that's everyone. - 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM 890 Views
I wouldn't jump on fist- he seems like he just rarely posts - 05/03/2010 06:21:34 AM 1217 Views
Also: Someone kill me! Eh, screw it. - 05/03/2010 06:27:29 AM 1154 Views
RBIRL - 05/03/2010 05:17:54 AM 963 Views
Well, Beet already hammered. - 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM 1000 Views
Hah! It's like a ghost! Or a lame-duck president - 05/03/2010 07:22:42 AM 1069 Views
Not a bad idea - 05/03/2010 08:13:59 AM 1059 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched - 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM 1075 Views
Sorry Beet! *NM* - 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM 585 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM 513 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM 636 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED! - 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM 1102 Views
Hmm... tell me more about this robot-heaven - 06/03/2010 09:15:57 PM 1162 Views
In both places, the humans are our slaves - 07/03/2010 06:48:29 PM 1162 Views

Reply to Message