Which one of them made this comment?
Probably me- it's how I talk/write. And, as I've said above, it's what I think a good DF strategy is- very likely the reason Blaine got killed was because he was so quiet.
*awaits the inevitable insinuations*
No insinuations, you already expressed this sentiment earlier today, practically word for word:
http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/79461/
I remember it rather well since earlier I said the first thing you did on Day 2 was to make accusations against me, but late rnoticed that it was actually your second message, made shortly after the one I just linked.
So I'm not surprised or made more suspicious that you are expressing the same sentiment again, except it confirms obviously that you do think it's a good tactic for DFs to use, both then and now, meaning you would have last night.
What bothers me is your reaction on this. Assuming your surprise at who authored the comments is not feigned, it would seem a strong indicator you have not reviewed these NBs recently... which would be very bizarre behavior from a player, seeing as Fox announced his intent to display those NBs, and quite some time elapsed for you to review them before he did. I have difficulty imagining why either a townie or a DF would not do so. A townie should have themselves been wondering if any of that material might make them look bad, serve as a defense, or represent additonal guilt on Fox or ranagrande. Seeing as you are the main accuser of ranagrande, one would expect you to want to present evidence, and once it had been pointed out that those NBs between the three of you might provide insight or evidence, I would have thought you'd have leapt at the chance. Therefore you of all people have the strongest motivation, if you are a townie, to hunt through that info. I would like to know why you have not.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over.
- 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM
3860 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
- 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM
1789 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
- 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM
1586 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia?
- 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM
1756 Views
I am not Hopper
- 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM
1668 Views
- 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM
1668 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME
- 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM
1697 Views
A few questions and comments
- 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM
1627 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
- 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM
1616 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM*
- 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM
973 Views
You know what?
- 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM
1597 Views
Re: You know what?
- 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM
1546 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry.
- 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM
1609 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
- 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM
1597 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
- 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM
1686 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
- 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM
1614 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement.
- 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM
1759 Views
- 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM
1759 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family.
- 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM
1734 Views
Hypocop (Table)
- 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM
1695 Views
I investigated Fox and Ravens and found hi to be for the shadow. *NM*
- 09/02/2010 04:46:50 AM
925 Views
Hmmm,
- 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM
1555 Views
We didn't lose two of our biggest roles. Also- I wonder if there are more roles?
- 09/02/2010 06:35:05 AM
1458 Views
Re: We didn't lose two of our biggest roles. Also- I wonder if there are more roles?
- 09/02/2010 07:16:19 AM
1569 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh
- 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM
1430 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM*
- 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM
953 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM*
- 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM
934 Views
I want to throw this out here.
- 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM
1617 Views
What changed your mind? *NM*
- 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM
906 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone.
- 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM
1635 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK?
- 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM
1647 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic".
- 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM
1500 Views
That's so arbitrary, though.
- 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM
1429 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante.
- 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM
1650 Views
That seems like good reasoning
- 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM
1574 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning
- 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM
1627 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that
- 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM
1563 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense.
- 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM
1700 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable
- 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM
1502 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism
- 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM
1906 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM*
- 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM
927 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM*
- 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM
949 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM*
- 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM
885 Views
Because we have a SK *NM*
- 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM
877 Views
wait a minute
- 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM
1602 Views
Another thing
- 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM
1674 Views
F-T, I assume
- 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM
1530 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM*
- 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM
916 Views
I don't think it could be a RB
- 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM
1631 Views
We're stalling out a bit
- 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM
1540 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine...
- 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM
1624 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game
- 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM
1789 Views
Yawn...
- 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM
1736 Views
Re: Yawn...
- 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM
1685 Views
Re: Yawn...
- 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM
1630 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself
- 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM
1772 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again.
- 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM
1432 Views
On F-T's accusations against you.
- 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM
1579 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you.
- 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM
1489 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records
- 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM
1547 Views
- 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM
1547 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one
- 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM
1530 Views
I'm in second? Woo!
- 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM
1550 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod
- 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM
1715 Views
- 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM
1715 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT.
- 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM
1580 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you
- 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM
1550 Views
Game 1 I remember.
- 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM
1422 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember.
- 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM
1792 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart.
- 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM
1762 Views
Actually...
- 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM
1633 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande
- 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM
1829 Views
Vote: Hieshyn
- 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM
1401 Views
Re: Hieshyn
- 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM
1699 Views
Well, it's less that discussion is winding down, and more that we don't have any new topics
- 15/02/2010 05:48:22 PM
1465 Views
Well this was unexpected.
- 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM
1508 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected.
- 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM
1527 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF
- 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM
1441 Views
If he was the SK
- 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM
1651 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession.
- 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM
1498 Views
Oh that's right!
- 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM
1505 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession.
- 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM
1592 Views
Lol irony
- 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM
1552 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people
- 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM
1644 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing.
- 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM
1666 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky
- 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM
1759 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky
- 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM
1592 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched
- 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM
1614 Views
Oh, I know it can.
- 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM
1621 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can.
- 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM
1685 Views
It's weird- I've never played Live Mafia, but I imagine it's very different.
- 16/02/2010 08:58:09 AM
1666 Views
I'm still here, I've been busy with studying, and hadn't realized I was gone this long.
- 16/02/2010 06:50:44 AM
1531 Views
Sorry all. Friday thru Monday suddenly got really hectic, I wasn't home much at all.
- 18/02/2010 01:54:02 AM
1571 Views
So, where are we at?
- 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM
1591 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7
- 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM
1639 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself
- 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM
1681 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself
- 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM
1561 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything
- 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM
1471 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off.
- 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM
1511 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question
- 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM
1534 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question
- 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM
1740 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2
- 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM
1518 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2
- 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM
1486 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it
- 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM
1531 Views
Alright then.
- 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM
1304 Views
EBWOP
- 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM
1670 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM
1666 Views
Naive?
- 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM
1623 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick
- 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM
1630 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like
- 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM
1379 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game...
- 19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM
1480 Views
Re: Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game...
- 19/02/2010 08:40:47 PM
1490 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM
1470 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM
1462 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN!
- 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM
1531 Views
Hey.
- 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM
1580 Views
Re: Hey.
- 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM
1687 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF
- 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM
1452 Views
Don't put words in my mouth.
- 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM
1672 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM*
- 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM
925 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM*
- 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM
895 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts?
- 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM
1553 Views
I think that
- 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM
1593 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions...
- 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM
1537 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
- 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM
1514 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
- 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM
1443 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
- 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM
1595 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence.
- 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM
1479 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going
- 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM
1558 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll)
- 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM
1619 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll)
- 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM
1610 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no
- 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM
1531 Views
After seeing this thread....
- 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM
1452 Views
Go ahead and start one then.
- 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM
1581 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then.
- 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM
1668 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere?
- 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM
1667 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere?
- 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM
1713 Views
Alright.
- 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM
1601 Views
Thanks
- 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM
1475 Views
Re: Thanks
- 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM
1446 Views
Ranagrande *NM*
- 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM
889 Views
Really?
- 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM
1589 Views
Re: Thanks
- 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM
1553 Views
I do have a question
- 21/02/2010 07:12:57 PM
1637 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself.
- 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM
1526 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande
- 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM
1598 Views
Not sure I follow
- 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM
1609 Views
Items of note from my NB archive:
- 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM
1708 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here.
- 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM
1764 Views
I'm feeling the same thing.
- 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM
1579 Views
I hadn't even seen Beet's post at the bottom there until after I'd posted this.
- 22/02/2010 07:44:49 PM
1516 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2
- 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM
1596 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis
- 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM
1610 Views
That sounds about right to me.
- 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM
1598 Views
I'll try to, I just may not have the time to. If I do, I'll definately read them all. *NM*
- 23/02/2010 07:05:24 AM
833 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande
- 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM
1623 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande
- 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM
1756 Views
Fair enough
- 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM
1717 Views
Re: Fair enough
- 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM
1544 Views
Maybe I missed it....
- 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM
1678 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it....
- 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM
1519 Views
I will destroy the world
- 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM
1653 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM*
- 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM
793 Views
Ok, that's totally different...
- 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM
1515 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent.
- 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM
1664 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM*
- 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM
812 Views
Yea.... beet's looking worse and worse every time he opens his mouth, so to speak. *NM*
- 24/02/2010 09:00:47 PM
905 Views
No, this is my view:
- 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM
1647 Views
And my view was:
- 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM
1526 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know
- 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM
1583 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
- 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM
897 Views
Can I ask why?
- 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM
1547 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn
- 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM
1710 Views
You're right, Isaac.
- 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM
1695 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM*
- 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM
831 Views
I'll agree. Beet has been suspicious, and we havent found enough with ranagrande to continue *NM*
- 26/02/2010 02:00:36 AM
931 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap
- 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM
1604 Views
RBIRL. Had a lot of school stuff, gone for the weekend. Sorry. *NM*
- 27/02/2010 01:05:40 AM
900 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy.
- 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM
1689 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS.
- 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM
1521 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy.
- 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM
1596 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today
- 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM
1620 Views
Interesting.
- 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM
1526 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it
- 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM
1590 Views
Vote: ranagrande
- 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM
1538 Views
What, if anything, has changed?
- 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM
1528 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM*
- 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM
870 Views
A little joke
- 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM
2316 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text)
- 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM
1561 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis
- 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM
1490 Views
my stance on voting
- 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM
1630 Views
Re: my stance on voting
- 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM
1675 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up?
- 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM
1512 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this
- 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM
1419 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days
- 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM
1468 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these.
- 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM
1502 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right.
- 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM
1464 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced
- 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM
1441 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok...
- 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM
1531 Views
All right, let's look at this
- 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM
1623 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely.
- 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM
1655 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case
- 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM
1549 Views
You brought this upon yourself.
- 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM
1499 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No'
- 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM
1703 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay
- 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM
1429 Views
I think that's everyone.
- 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM
1442 Views
Well, Beet already hammered.
- 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM
1517 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched
- 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM
1599 Views
Sorry Beet!
*NM*
- 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM
903 Views
*NM*
- 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM
903 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM*
- 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM
815 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM*
- 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM
962 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED!
- 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM
1648 Views


*NM*

*NM*