Alright, so this is like my third draft of this post.
-I started off by looking at Isaac again. "Hm," I said. "The main reason I wasn't suspecting Isaac is because he's been posting a lot, and making himself highly visible. A DF wouldn't do that... but, as Isaac said, he's a magnet for lynches and NKs anyway."
But then I looked at his strident defense of ranagrande. Ranagrande would be lynched already without Isaac, I'd say. And after a second look, Isaac's defense of ranagrande seemed... good. Not ironclad, but logical.
So, options:
*Isaac is a DF, and ranagrande is innocent: A great way for Isaac to build credibility with ranagrande (or with all of us if we lynch rana). But his defense was so strong, and Isaac's admitted he often ends up dead very soon ANYWAY... so, I think this is unlikely- Isaac wouldn't be too concerned with building up credibility when he knows people suspect him anyway.
*Isaac is a DF, and so is ranagrande: Possible- I don't know Isaac's inclinations towards sacrificing a fellow DF once the death seems inevitable. Still, after the FT thing, I don't think Isaac-the-DF would want to link himself to anyone else if it could hurt his team.
*Isaacis innocent, ranagrande is guilty- Seems almost 50/50. Isaac could easily just be an earnest defender (especially since he suspected me, and I was attacking ranagrande). So, hm. (And keep in mind someone's earlier point that 50/50 is better odds than a random guess)
___
Then, I started thinking about F&R. First of all, Hieshyn hypocopped F&R as guilty, and is now voting for him- spearheading the vote, in fact. I'm not quite up on my cop tactics (never been one... OR HAVE I???... no, I haven't), but, is that a good idea?
F&R accused ranagrande- and this was after a lot of back and forth between me and Isaac. Fox injected some new blood into the conversation, as it were- so was he just eager for a new target, or trying to distract?
So...
Fox=innocent, ranagrande and Isaac=guilty. ...Maybe. Isaac's been inextricably classified as ranagrande's defender, however unwillingly. But if they were teammates, and Isaac suspected he'd soon die (again, since he's a high-profile target), would he want to effectively condemn a teammate? Or did he feel ranagrande would die without his help, so he may as well help him survive another day or two?
Fox guilty, ranagrande guilty: Highly unlikely- ranagrande wouldn't even be a target if it wasn't for Fox, I think.
Fox guilty, ranagrande innocent, Isaac guilty: Also pretty unlikely, I'd think. It'd be pretty neat if it was true, but that's some high-level maneuvering there. I could maybe see it if Isaac was attacking ranagrande and Fox defending (Fox defending the innocent + Isaac's inevitable death would make Fox golden), but I don't think it'd happen with the current setup.
Fox guilty, ranagrande innocent, Isaac innocent: ...Maybe. Fox would be going out on a limb, and I think he tries to be less risky (especially this early in the game). But we were in a deadlock before Fox spoke up, so it could have been an attempt to take an uncertain crowd and force the lynch. Then, when I showed uncertainty, Fox turned on me instead... Fox didn't actually vote for me, though, so not TOO likely.
Fox and Isaac innocent, ranagrande guilty: Actually pretty plausible. Both have made logical arguments, but half the time logic just says what you already believed anyway. Ranagrande got impatient and sloppy, but it was ambiguous enough for Isaac to mount a defense- especially since Isaac was already suspicious of me, and I was coming out against ranagrande.
All three innocent: Possible, but... I don't think so. I know I'm innocent and the four of us are the main suspects for today. How likely is it that all 4 are innocent? (This logic really only works for me, since only I can confirm my innocence, but eh. Might as well say what I'm thinking)
____________
So I've been looking it over, and there's really just one last fact that's going to push me over the edge. It's kind of ridiculous, but...
Ranagrande has supported me. Unconditionally.
WHY?
Isaac, Kronin, F&R, DK have all suspected me at one point or another. No matter what, even when I was part of the attack against ranagrande, he never issued a single word of doubt. In fact, even his most recent posts have had nothing but nice things to say regarding me. He even attacked Kronin when I accused him on more or less a gut feeling!
Either ranagrande is both very forgiving and insightful as to my play style (and I've played with him as much as any of the rest of you), or he's a DF, and hoping to get me- an accuser who has admitted he's on the fence- on his side.
So... yeah.
Sorry, buddy. It's been nice having an unconditional supporter, and people will probably think I'm just turning on a fellow DF, but...
Vote: Ranagrande
-I started off by looking at Isaac again. "Hm," I said. "The main reason I wasn't suspecting Isaac is because he's been posting a lot, and making himself highly visible. A DF wouldn't do that... but, as Isaac said, he's a magnet for lynches and NKs anyway."
But then I looked at his strident defense of ranagrande. Ranagrande would be lynched already without Isaac, I'd say. And after a second look, Isaac's defense of ranagrande seemed... good. Not ironclad, but logical.
So, options:
*Isaac is a DF, and ranagrande is innocent: A great way for Isaac to build credibility with ranagrande (or with all of us if we lynch rana). But his defense was so strong, and Isaac's admitted he often ends up dead very soon ANYWAY... so, I think this is unlikely- Isaac wouldn't be too concerned with building up credibility when he knows people suspect him anyway.
*Isaac is a DF, and so is ranagrande: Possible- I don't know Isaac's inclinations towards sacrificing a fellow DF once the death seems inevitable. Still, after the FT thing, I don't think Isaac-the-DF would want to link himself to anyone else if it could hurt his team.
*Isaacis innocent, ranagrande is guilty- Seems almost 50/50. Isaac could easily just be an earnest defender (especially since he suspected me, and I was attacking ranagrande). So, hm. (And keep in mind someone's earlier point that 50/50 is better odds than a random guess)
___
Then, I started thinking about F&R. First of all, Hieshyn hypocopped F&R as guilty, and is now voting for him- spearheading the vote, in fact. I'm not quite up on my cop tactics (never been one... OR HAVE I???... no, I haven't), but, is that a good idea?
F&R accused ranagrande- and this was after a lot of back and forth between me and Isaac. Fox injected some new blood into the conversation, as it were- so was he just eager for a new target, or trying to distract?
So...
Fox=innocent, ranagrande and Isaac=guilty. ...Maybe. Isaac's been inextricably classified as ranagrande's defender, however unwillingly. But if they were teammates, and Isaac suspected he'd soon die (again, since he's a high-profile target), would he want to effectively condemn a teammate? Or did he feel ranagrande would die without his help, so he may as well help him survive another day or two?
Fox guilty, ranagrande guilty: Highly unlikely- ranagrande wouldn't even be a target if it wasn't for Fox, I think.
Fox guilty, ranagrande innocent, Isaac guilty: Also pretty unlikely, I'd think. It'd be pretty neat if it was true, but that's some high-level maneuvering there. I could maybe see it if Isaac was attacking ranagrande and Fox defending (Fox defending the innocent + Isaac's inevitable death would make Fox golden), but I don't think it'd happen with the current setup.
Fox guilty, ranagrande innocent, Isaac innocent: ...Maybe. Fox would be going out on a limb, and I think he tries to be less risky (especially this early in the game). But we were in a deadlock before Fox spoke up, so it could have been an attempt to take an uncertain crowd and force the lynch. Then, when I showed uncertainty, Fox turned on me instead... Fox didn't actually vote for me, though, so not TOO likely.
Fox and Isaac innocent, ranagrande guilty: Actually pretty plausible. Both have made logical arguments, but half the time logic just says what you already believed anyway. Ranagrande got impatient and sloppy, but it was ambiguous enough for Isaac to mount a defense- especially since Isaac was already suspicious of me, and I was coming out against ranagrande.
All three innocent: Possible, but... I don't think so. I know I'm innocent and the four of us are the main suspects for today. How likely is it that all 4 are innocent? (This logic really only works for me, since only I can confirm my innocence, but eh. Might as well say what I'm thinking)
____________
So I've been looking it over, and there's really just one last fact that's going to push me over the edge. It's kind of ridiculous, but...
Ranagrande has supported me. Unconditionally.
WHY?
Isaac, Kronin, F&R, DK have all suspected me at one point or another. No matter what, even when I was part of the attack against ranagrande, he never issued a single word of doubt. In fact, even his most recent posts have had nothing but nice things to say regarding me. He even attacked Kronin when I accused him on more or less a gut feeling!
Either ranagrande is both very forgiving and insightful as to my play style (and I've played with him as much as any of the rest of you), or he's a DF, and hoping to get me- an accuser who has admitted he's on the fence- on his side.
So... yeah.
Sorry, buddy. It's been nice having an unconditional supporter, and people will probably think I'm just turning on a fellow DF, but...
Vote: Ranagrande
I amuse myself.
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over.
08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM
- 3319 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM
- 1256 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM
- 1027 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia?
08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM
- 1167 Views
I am not Hopper
08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM
- 1082 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME
08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM
- 1166 Views
A few questions and comments
08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM
- 1128 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM
- 1083 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM*
09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM
- 676 Views
You know what?
09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM
- 1049 Views
Re: You know what?
09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM
- 1005 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry.
09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM
- 1040 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM
- 1060 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM
- 1105 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM
- 1056 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement.
09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM
- 1219 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family.
09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM
- 1049 Views
Hypocop (Table)
09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM
- 1119 Views
I investigated Fox and Ravens and found hi to be for the shadow. *NM*
09/02/2010 04:46:50 AM
- 587 Views
Hmmm,
09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM
- 1037 Views
We didn't lose two of our biggest roles. Also- I wonder if there are more roles?
09/02/2010 06:35:05 AM
- 971 Views
Re: We didn't lose two of our biggest roles. Also- I wonder if there are more roles?
09/02/2010 07:16:19 AM
- 1075 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh
09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM
- 902 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM*
09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM
- 641 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM*
09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM
- 604 Views
I want to throw this out here.
09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM
- 1068 Views
What changed your mind? *NM*
09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM
- 583 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone.
09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM
- 1071 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK?
10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM
- 1092 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic".
10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM
- 944 Views
That's so arbitrary, though.
10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM
- 909 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante.
10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM
- 1129 Views
That seems like good reasoning
10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM
- 1077 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning
10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM
- 1094 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that
10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM
- 1072 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense.
10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM
- 1146 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable
10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM
- 995 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism
10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM
- 1343 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM*
11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM
- 613 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM*
12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM
- 626 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM*
10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM
- 593 Views
Because we have a SK *NM*
10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM
- 547 Views
wait a minute
10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM
- 1048 Views
Another thing
10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM
- 1168 Views
F-T, I assume
10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM
- 996 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM*
10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM
- 626 Views
I don't think it could be a RB
10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM
- 1104 Views
We're stalling out a bit
11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM
- 992 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine...
12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM
- 1083 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game
12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM
- 1226 Views
Yawn...
12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM
- 1194 Views
Re: Yawn...
13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM
- 1157 Views
Re: Yawn...
13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM
- 1073 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself
13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM
- 1181 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again.
14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM
- 909 Views
On F-T's accusations against you.
14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM
- 1058 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you.
14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM
- 997 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records
14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM
- 1068 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one
14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM
- 963 Views
I'm in second? Woo!
14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM
- 1043 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod
14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM
- 1199 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT.
14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM
- 1032 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you
14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM
- 1045 Views
Game 1 I remember.
15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM
- 908 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember.
15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM
- 1272 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart.
15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM
- 1182 Views
Actually...
15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM
- 1120 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande
12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM
- 1281 Views
Vote: Hieshyn
15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM
- 919 Views
Re: Hieshyn
15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM
- 1169 Views
Well, it's less that discussion is winding down, and more that we don't have any new topics
15/02/2010 05:48:22 PM
- 929 Views
Well this was unexpected.
15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM
- 1009 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected.
15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM
- 993 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF
15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM
- 909 Views
If he was the SK
15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM
- 1154 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession.
15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM
- 1024 Views
Oh that's right!
15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM
- 1004 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession.
15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM
- 1083 Views
Lol irony
16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM
- 1032 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people
15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM
- 1101 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing.
16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM
- 1135 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky
16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM
- 1233 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky
16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM
- 1065 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched
16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM
- 1126 Views
Oh, I know it can.
16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM
- 1071 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can.
16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM
- 1153 Views
It's weird- I've never played Live Mafia, but I imagine it's very different.
16/02/2010 08:58:09 AM
- 1160 Views
I'm still here, I've been busy with studying, and hadn't realized I was gone this long.
16/02/2010 06:50:44 AM
- 1057 Views
Sorry all. Friday thru Monday suddenly got really hectic, I wasn't home much at all.
18/02/2010 01:54:02 AM
- 1063 Views
So, where are we at?
18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM
- 1054 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7
18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM
- 1102 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself
18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM
- 1187 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself
18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM
- 1043 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything
18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM
- 982 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off.
18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM
- 973 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question
18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM
- 983 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question
18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM
- 1150 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2
18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM
- 1029 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2
19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM
- 1003 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it
19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM
- 1048 Views
Alright then.
19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM
- 826 Views
EBWOP
19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM
- 1094 Views
Re: EBWOP
19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM
- 1114 Views
Naive?
19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM
- 1140 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick
19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM
- 1075 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like
20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM
- 891 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game...
19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM
- 975 Views
Re: Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game...
19/02/2010 08:40:47 PM
- 949 Views
Re: EBWOP
19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM
- 957 Views
Re: EBWOP
19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM
- 943 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN!
18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM
- 1009 Views
Hey.
18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM
- 1053 Views
Re: Hey.
18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM
- 1158 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF
18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM
- 957 Views
Don't put words in my mouth.
18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM
- 1106 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM*
18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM
- 622 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM*
18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM
- 598 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts?
18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM
- 1037 Views
I think that
18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM
- 1092 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions...
18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM
- 998 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM
- 1016 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM
- 955 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM
- 1078 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence.
19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM
- 981 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going
19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM
- 1021 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll)
19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM
- 1055 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll)
19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM
- 1106 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no
20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM
- 994 Views
After seeing this thread....
20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM
- 940 Views
Go ahead and start one then.
20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM
- 1034 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then.
20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM
- 1126 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere?
20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM
- 1145 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere?
20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM
- 1203 Views
Alright.
20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM
- 1082 Views
Thanks
20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM
- 930 Views
Re: Thanks
20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM
- 951 Views
Ranagrande *NM*
21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM
- 576 Views
Really?
21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM
- 1025 Views
Re: Thanks
21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM
- 1031 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself.
21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM
- 983 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande
21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM
- 1081 Views
Not sure I follow
22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM
- 1090 Views
Items of note from my NB archive:
21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM
- 1156 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here.
22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM
- 1200 Views
I'm feeling the same thing.
22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM
- 1034 Views
I hadn't even seen Beet's post at the bottom there until after I'd posted this.
22/02/2010 07:44:49 PM
- 1051 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2
22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM
- 1070 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis
22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM
- 1078 Views
That sounds about right to me.
22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM
- 1032 Views
I'll try to, I just may not have the time to. If I do, I'll definately read them all. *NM*
23/02/2010 07:05:24 AM
- 532 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande
22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM
- 1111 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande
22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM
- 1190 Views
Fair enough
22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM
- 1106 Views
Re: Fair enough
22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM
- 1010 Views
Maybe I missed it....
22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM
- 1103 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it....
23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM
- 995 Views
I will destroy the world
23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM
- 1120 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM*
24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM
- 491 Views
Ok, that's totally different...
24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM
- 1002 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent.
24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM
- 1073 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM*
24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM
- 515 Views
Yea.... beet's looking worse and worse every time he opens his mouth, so to speak. *NM*
24/02/2010 09:00:47 PM
- 609 Views
No, this is my view:
24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM
- 1131 Views
And my view was:
25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM
- 995 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know
25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM
- 1063 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM
- 603 Views
Can I ask why?
24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM
- 1015 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn
25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM
- 1156 Views
You're right, Isaac.
25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM
- 1161 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM*
25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM
- 515 Views
I'll agree. Beet has been suspicious, and we havent found enough with ranagrande to continue *NM*
26/02/2010 02:00:36 AM
- 629 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap
26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM
- 1085 Views
RBIRL. Had a lot of school stuff, gone for the weekend. Sorry. *NM*
27/02/2010 01:05:40 AM
- 604 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy.
27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM
- 1158 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS.
27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM
- 990 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy.
27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM
- 1068 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today
27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM
- 1074 Views
Interesting.
27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM
- 1028 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it
27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM
- 1034 Views
Vote: ranagrande
27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM
- 989 Views
What, if anything, has changed?
28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM
- 1026 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM*
28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM
- 553 Views
A little joke
28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM
- 1616 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text)
28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM
- 989 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis
28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM
- 1007 Views
my stance on voting
01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM
- 1140 Views
Re: my stance on voting
01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM
- 1175 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up?
02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM
- 1006 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this
03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM
- 908 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days
03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM
- 897 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these.
03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM
- 959 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right.
03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM
- 964 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced
03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM
- 935 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok...
04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM
- 990 Views
All right, let's look at this
04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM
- 1087 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely.
04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM
- 1132 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case
04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM
- 1051 Views
You brought this upon yourself.
03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM
- 984 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No'
04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM
- 1103 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay
04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM
- 894 Views
I think that's everyone.
05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM
- 898 Views
Well, Beet already hammered.
05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM
- 1009 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched
05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM
- 1082 Views
Sorry Beet! *NM*
06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM
- 588 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM*
06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM
- 517 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM*
06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM
- 639 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED!
06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM
- 1113 Views