Active Users:773 Time:11/08/2026 01:51:21 AM
A few thoughts ranagrande Send a noteboard - 19/02/2010 03:22:32 PM
He seems to be as good a candidate as any right now, and the day's discussion does seem to be winding down. I'm not going to vote just yet, as I'd like to see how he responds, but I likely will if nothing else comes up.

My first take on this (I have not yet read your comments other than a skim to see you'd made them) is that this translates as:

Townie: He's as good a candidate as any other, apparently better form what you said, I'm not ready to vote for him yet... since you emphasized you were trying to get him to talk, my saying I'm willing to vote for him as is can only furhter encourage him.

DF: He's as good a candidate as any other, apparently better form what you said, I'm not ready to vote for him yet... but if the case get's stronger, he'd make a good frame-up.

Thoughts: Comments are insufficiently long to determine specific intent, originate from a player with no established MO, and do not seem particular out of the ordinary. However, base don your own aggressive approach on it, and your comment that "While I'm not entirely suspicious of him, I really want him talking. If he doesn't talk, we might as well lynch him anyway if we end up with no one else to vote for." could easily be seen as an outright request for support, or easily be viewed by a sympathetic townie as reason to join you in taking a firm stance to get Hieshyn talking.

First thing's first. This post is my main argument here. Obviously, my point is that he jumped on it pretty strong. THere was admittedly no evidence other than lack of talking. I scrounged up what I could and put some sauce on it and that was my post of Hieshyn. Then, immediately, probably thinking he could get a quick lynch because of the inactivity (of the game and Hieshyn), he jumped right on and said he would vote for him without giving any explanation.

Well, his response is stronger than player-average, but not out of the ordinary, I've seen parallel levels of aggression from townies and DFs, no real pattern to it, I'd go so far as to say townies do this more often then DFs, of course they make up the majority of the players so it's not exactly contradictory evidence. But yes, I definetly see what is being regarded as suspicious there, but I'm inclined to think he was just engaging in active, threatening support to get Hieshyn talking than really trying to say, against all common sense, that he was fine with randomly lynching someone. DF's do make mistakes like that but I can see a pretty straight forward Occam's Razor on this one.
Yeah, I mainly just wanted to see where it would go. And I have not been displeased with the results; the game is certainly more active now than it was before that conversation.

Another:

This on the other hand... We can't allow ourselves to be so focused on a single target that broadening our horizons should elicit such a negative response, and especially not on Day 1.

More accusations will make the game more active and create more conversation. More conversation will create more opportunity for darkfriends to trip themselves up. Even if we don't recognize it now, that could be invaluable later on.

Also, it's not like the case against F-T will disappear just because someone named a new suspect. I said earlier that my initial response to the Miller roleclaim was to believe him, and I still do for the most part, but I would welcome any evidence or conjecture to the contrary. Again, it is more activity and more conversation, which can only help us.

And now I have to say, if I wasn't suspicious of you before, I am now.

The suspicious part is his last statement here. It was in reference to Kronin saying that he'll be focusing on beet for trying to change our targets if FT turns out to be bad. Why are you so suspicious of Kronin for saying that he'll be focusing on beet? Honestly, to me, it just looks like your trying to make us leery of Kronin because he could be a threat to you. You may have your own interpretation but this is what it says to me.

That one seems pretty clear, beet was raising other targets, and Kronin (as the other target) told beet that he'd be gunning for him next if FT turned out guilty. Ranagrande is telling Kronin why he think it's important to explore other options and maximize debate, and that Kronin's threat to beet, which gives the appearance of trying to shut down alternate debate, makes ranagrande suspicious of him. In context, it is actually a fairly pro-town comment. Now, I agree with Kronin's sentiment, obviously if FT had turned out guilty we'd have strung beet up, but it's very clear from the context that ranagrande was accusing KRonin of being suspicious because his message could easily be taken as an attempt to shut down attempts to find alternate targets. Beet was the only one really doing much on that score, at that point I'd already said I would not, as I was angry over the respons eI'd gotten from exploring FT's case, and no one was really raising anything else. No, this comment really is more of minor point in ranagrande's favor than against.
This. Kronin even admitted in his response to me that it had been a stupid thing to say.

As Katie said, Blaine has yet to post in this game. I'd say we could wait a bit and see if we get a modkill, but Gher has stated that all players are accounted for so he must have messaged him or something.

There's sounds like nothing more than usual player agitation about inactivity, which I could see your viewing as suspicious when the impression was that ranagrande himself was pretty inactive, and their for might be flavoring your thoughts, but as this was not the case...

Now, this comment actually predates FT's RC, and follows MPD discussions, and is in reply to a long post by me in which I was discussing ways to avoid tampering by the DFs while narrowing odds if we were forced to use a random lynch. I was asking people for ways to narrow down random selectees, suggesting we do our nominal potluck out of inactives is hardly surprising.

Same deal here. So Blaine hasn't posted yet and you're suspicious of him?? I mean, maybe if you were frustrated or dissapointed or just straight up ready to lynch, but suspicious? I don't see why you have cause for that.

I would say I consider finding a total inactive suspicious for that reason isn't exactly the best logic, but it's also not bad either. Context being important, this comment seemed totally in place as a reply to my own comments, of course, I was getting ready to suggest we pick our 'pool of three or four' as players who posted least, as punshiment for inactivity and/or encouragement to talk more, so I viewed Blaine's comments as a handy thing that saved me having to openly say it. Now, ironically this makes his comment in reply to your Hieshyn vote more likely to have been of the 'firm support of the threat to lynch if Hieshyn doesn't speak up' scenario. Regardless of his alignment, both comments seem to indicate that ranagrande is of the 'threaten to kill people if they don't participate more' mindset (which I share, perhaps why it is easy for me to regard his comments that way) and as we've seen, his posting numbers indicate this statement is not out of place or hypocritical.
I am indeed a member of that school of thought, for two reasons. First of all, as we've all seen, voting stimulates conversation and being voted for is a great catalyst for getting less active players to participate more. Secondly, if we ever DO find ourselves in a situation where we have to settle for a random lynch, I would prefer to kill someone who is not contributing.

These two following posts are a big one too.

That sounds like solid reasoning to me

ranagrande Send a noteboard - 30/01/2010 10:07:05 PM

I think I might be inclined to believe you.

This is in reply to FT giving his reasoning for the Day 1 miller claim, immediatly in reply to my own comment to FT's original RC post. I had not yet inserted any of the counter-reasoning for why there were advantages for a DF to make this claim. This sounds like a townie expressing limited support, who later changed after arguments were presented and no alternates showed up, this seems quit ein keeping with his later statements. Let me point out DK rpeplied to say the same, later expressed the same doubts, and later voted for the same reasons as ranagrande. So did many other players.

Yeah it is...

ranagrande Send a noteboard - 31/01/2010 04:55:29 PM

I had stopped paying close attention after my death in the last game too, but I still noticed Yunalesca's Miller claim. I don't really see how F-T could have missed it.

I maintain that it was very weird for FT not to know that and certainly it makes sense to be surprised that he didn't. Only later, as I pointed out, did we have reaosn not to think that was surprising, that Miller never appeared in any title of a message and that FT had posted he was very busy and distracted in a different game thread at a parallel time. Considering he was agreeing with me, DK, and Kronin at the time, that the comment seemed unlikely and dubious, this doesn't seem out of place. Once again, all it seems to note is that ranagrande was apparently saying and thinking along the same lines as the other players who voted for FT and were talkative, namely, me, Kronin, and DK, I tihnk you'd agree, it is most unlikely all four of us are on the same side as DFs.
I still agree. I don't think it really changed anything, but it was odd.

This second post is in response to a post saying that the miller thing was something FT shouldn't have missed. Basically, I'm saying that his thoughts are quite scattered. He's changing sides here, visibly, which is something DFs tend to do. It's obviously not much but in a day, he went from agreeing with FT back to saying he didn't like what he's saying to eventually voting for him. This wishy washy posting makes me quite leery.

He changed no sides. Again, his comment sparallel those of most others who expressed initial tentative support of FT's claim then withdrew it as the possibility it might be a legit DF tactic and the lack of alternate candidates became clear. Wishy=washy posting is common to DFs, but it is also common to townies, and everyone was wishy-washy on FT who voted for him, mostly in the same way and degree as ranagrande expresses just in keeping with their own style.
I believed F-T initially, and even at the end, I didn't really think he was guilty. But I had been convinced over the course of the day that we stood to gain from his death, even if he was a townie. So I voted for him. With no other serious candidates on Day 1 and no leads of my own, I thought it was the best thing to do.
Reply to message
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over. - 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM 3862 Views
List of Players - 08/02/2010 06:58:04 PM 1680 Views
This is great, thanks! *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:19:25 AM 1018 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:25:25 AM 1744 Views
Crap! - 15/02/2010 03:26:24 AM 1606 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM 1792 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM 1588 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia? - 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM 1758 Views
I am not Hopper - 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM 1670 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME - 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM 1700 Views
Now that's a questionable claim. - 09/02/2010 02:36:25 AM 1700 Views
Hah! You underestimate my ego, madam! - 09/02/2010 06:25:28 AM 1569 Views
A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM 1628 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 10:31:32 PM 1618 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 11:23:07 PM 1458 Views
Third Party - 08/02/2010 09:43:57 PM 1542 Views
Re: Third Party - 08/02/2010 10:34:38 PM 1607 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM 1617 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 03:53:18 AM 1652 Views
I thinking Lynching F-T was the right thing to do. - 09/02/2010 04:45:13 AM 1604 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM* - 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM 974 Views
You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM 1601 Views
NO! - 09/02/2010 01:31:57 AM 1565 Views
Re: You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM 1548 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM 1611 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM 1599 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM 1687 Views
Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:05:04 AM 1589 Views
Re: Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:50:41 AM 1709 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM 1616 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement. - 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM 1763 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family. - 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM 1736 Views
See, that way the betrayal is personal. - 09/02/2010 04:41:47 AM 1816 Views
Ouch *NM* - 09/02/2010 04:58:13 PM 1006 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 01:02:30 AM 913 Views
Hypocop (Table) - 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM 1698 Views
Beetnemesis, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:17:10 AM 912 Views
Okay - 09/02/2010 01:29:09 AM 1451 Views
Kronin, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:53:09 AM 873 Views
Isaac, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:12:07 AM 1009 Views
Isaac, innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:37:54 AM 926 Views
Investigated fistofpainx, found him to be innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 06:27:37 AM 945 Views
DK, found her innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:48:11 PM 926 Views
Fox and Ravens, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 03:57:50 PM 891 Views
Vote Record (Table) - 09/02/2010 01:30:51 AM 1685 Views
I'll add: list of players who did NOT vote yesterday - 09/02/2010 06:46:38 AM 1604 Views
RBIRL - 09/02/2010 04:45:19 AM 1548 Views
Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM 1556 Views
Re: Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 07:20:02 AM 1531 Views
Yeah, I agree with the Blaine rationalization - 09/02/2010 08:57:19 AM 1572 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh - 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM 1432 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM 954 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM 934 Views
Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 04:57:26 PM 1735 Views
Re: Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 07:27:00 PM 1513 Views
I want to throw this out here. - 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM 1619 Views
What changed your mind? *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM 906 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone. - 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM 1638 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 02:56:52 AM 917 Views
I thought you'd like that. *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:00:19 PM 856 Views
I was going to post a few thoughts here this morning... - 09/02/2010 01:49:26 PM 1590 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM 1650 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic". - 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM 1501 Views
Good point. Is an arsonist usually a third party? *NM* - 10/02/2010 12:28:10 AM 856 Views
That's so arbitrary, though. - 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM 1433 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante. - 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM 1653 Views
That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM 1577 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM 1630 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that - 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM 1564 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense. - 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM 1702 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable - 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM 1505 Views
Oh, my bad then! *NM* - 10/02/2010 10:19:13 PM 930 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism - 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM 1909 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM* - 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM 928 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM* - 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM 949 Views
I was the best vigilante you guys have ever had! *NM* - 12/02/2010 02:19:57 AM 923 Views
The only vigilante we've ever had. - 12/02/2010 02:25:20 AM 1494 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM* - 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM 886 Views
Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:19:10 AM 1627 Views
Re: Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:56:10 AM 1532 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:50:51 AM 1790 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 01:11:50 AM 1533 Views
Because we have a SK *NM* - 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM 878 Views
I agree that we probably have a SK - 10/02/2010 07:50:33 PM 1526 Views
Nah, I was just saying *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:06:54 AM 923 Views
wait a minute - 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM 1603 Views
Sensors? *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:42:36 PM 811 Views
Another thing - 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM 1679 Views
F-T, I assume - 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM 1534 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM* - 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM 917 Views
I don't think it could be a RB - 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM 1632 Views
Probably not, but not for that reason - 10/02/2010 08:32:57 PM 1609 Views
Huh. - 10/02/2010 09:11:29 PM 1587 Views
Did anyone get any messages last night? - 10/02/2010 08:23:03 PM 1510 Views
Nope *NM* - 10/02/2010 08:35:18 PM 890 Views
Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:14:46 PM 1552 Views
Re: Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:41:19 PM 1689 Views
RBIRL - 11/02/2010 04:52:12 PM 1519 Views
Good luck! *NM* - 11/02/2010 07:05:40 PM 859 Views
Re: RBIRL - 11/02/2010 09:59:39 PM 1763 Views
We're stalling out a bit - 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM 1541 Views
Yep. - 12/02/2010 02:58:02 AM 1439 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine... - 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM 1627 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game - 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM 1792 Views
Yawn... - 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM 1738 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM 1687 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM 1632 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:24:40 AM 1555 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself - 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM 1775 Views
Dammit, I had a post and then it got deleted. - 14/02/2010 01:45:31 AM 1539 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again. - 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM 1436 Views
Always happy to answer your questions - 14/02/2010 07:35:35 AM 1480 Views
Thanks for the answers. - 15/02/2010 07:29:31 PM 1571 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:02:34 AM 1656 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:48:22 AM 1526 Views
On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM 1581 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM 1489 Views
Oh, right, I modded that one. - 14/02/2010 04:11:46 AM 1506 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records - 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM 1550 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one - 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM 1531 Views
I'm in second? Woo! - 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM 1553 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod - 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM 1717 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT. - 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM 1583 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you - 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM 1551 Views
Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM 1424 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM 1796 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart. - 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM 1763 Views
Oh, the MHael Steve incident! - 15/02/2010 04:42:31 AM 1570 Views
The game? Oh, right, that. - 15/02/2010 04:41:43 AM 1486 Views
Actually... - 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM 1638 Views
Sorry, it was my first game. - 16/02/2010 03:34:16 AM 1747 Views
That was my point actually. - 16/02/2010 06:25:17 AM 1641 Views
Those were the good old days. - 18/02/2010 01:21:44 AM 1595 Views
random thoughts - 15/02/2010 12:46:55 PM 1539 Views
I wasn't in that game. - 18/02/2010 01:19:06 AM 1498 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande - 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM 1832 Views
Argh... quote please - 12/02/2010 08:54:08 PM 1610 Views
Haha, fair enough - 12/02/2010 11:30:54 PM 1411 Views
I was getting all set to defend myself - 13/02/2010 01:21:58 AM 1672 Views
RBIRL - 14/02/2010 06:11:55 AM 1606 Views
Back - 18/02/2010 02:14:25 AM 1627 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM 1403 Views
Re: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM 1701 Views
That's giving up awfully early. - 15/02/2010 07:35:37 PM 1473 Views
Never give up! Never surrender! - 15/02/2010 08:31:19 PM 1633 Views
Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM 1511 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM 1531 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF - 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM 1444 Views
I don't think so - 16/02/2010 12:09:13 AM 1575 Views
I assumed - 16/02/2010 12:14:16 AM 1512 Views
Re: I assumed - 16/02/2010 01:28:43 AM 1628 Views
In a way Isaac is right - 16/02/2010 05:24:08 AM 1589 Views
If he was the SK - 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM 1653 Views
How many games did you guys play on wotmania, anyway? - 15/02/2010 08:43:04 PM 1521 Views
9 *NM* - 15/02/2010 08:53:23 PM 953 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM 1500 Views
Oh that's right! - 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM 1507 Views
We just took that game over. - 15/02/2010 10:12:43 PM 1582 Views
Oh yeah, we owned that one - 15/02/2010 11:48:12 PM 1462 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 1594 Views
Lol irony - 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM 1555 Views
what I thought was pretty funny - 16/02/2010 12:41:47 AM 1565 Views
Heh heh the Cairhienins would be proud *NM* - 16/02/2010 01:11:13 AM 929 Views
Oh, Isaac got High Seat there, didn't he? - 16/02/2010 01:33:05 AM 1547 Views
That was a fun one. - 18/02/2010 01:32:02 AM 1597 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people - 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM 1649 Views
well I really dont have anything worthwhile to say *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:06:11 PM 976 Views
Eh... not good enough - 16/02/2010 12:19:22 AM 1562 Views
Holiday weekend - 15/02/2010 11:49:37 PM 1523 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing. - 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM 1668 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM 1761 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM 1594 Views
It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 04:46:54 AM 1659 Views
Re: It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 05:30:34 AM 1586 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched - 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM 1616 Views
Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM 1624 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM 1687 Views
Since when are you against traps? - 16/02/2010 04:07:05 PM 1509 Views
Since game 4 or 5, roughly - 16/02/2010 10:57:19 PM 1584 Views
I'm glad it did too. - 16/02/2010 01:16:14 PM 1598 Views
Regarding Inactivity and whatnot - 16/02/2010 06:22:14 AM 1634 Views
RBIRL - exams Thursday *NM* - 17/02/2010 02:11:27 AM 950 Views
So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM 1594 Views
Re: So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 03:55:33 AM 1629 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7 - 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM 1641 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM 1686 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM 1563 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything - 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM 1474 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off. - 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM 1513 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM 1537 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM 1742 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM 1521 Views
My post, "Re: Hieshyn" - 18/02/2010 06:32:12 PM 1734 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM 1488 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it - 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM 1532 Views
A few thoughts - 19/02/2010 03:22:32 PM 1521 Views
Alright then. - 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM 1306 Views
EBWOP - 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM 1674 Views
Haha, I'm sorry - 19/02/2010 05:49:00 PM 1493 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM 1667 Views
Naive? - 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM 1627 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick - 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM 1633 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like - 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM 1382 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game... - 19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM 1484 Views
That's true- I've said as much earlier in this thread - 20/02/2010 02:08:47 AM 1520 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM 1472 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM 1464 Views
Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 06:03:18 AM 1550 Views
Re: Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 05:24:16 PM 1510 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN! - 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM 1534 Views
Hey. - 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM 1583 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:19:30 PM 1619 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 06:50:35 PM 1539 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM 1690 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF - 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM 1454 Views
Don't put words in my mouth. - 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM 1673 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM 927 Views
Well OK, a BIT more, because we know he was townie *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:34 PM 912 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM 896 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 18/02/2010 08:19:04 PM 882 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts? - 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM 1555 Views
I think that - 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM 1597 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions... - 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM 1540 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM 1517 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM 1445 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM 1597 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence. - 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM 1482 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going - 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM 1560 Views
About voting - 19/02/2010 03:33:34 PM 1591 Views
Idk if that question about voting can be answered. - 20/02/2010 06:15:21 AM 1614 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM 1623 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM 1614 Views
I agree - 20/02/2010 02:52:53 PM 1414 Views
Should be fine.. although, maybe only paraphrase? - 20/02/2010 02:03:30 AM 1501 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no - 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM 1534 Views
Seems pretty thorough to me! I pretty much agree. *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:12:40 AM 898 Views
After seeing this thread.... - 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM 1455 Views
Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM 1584 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM 1670 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM 1670 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM 1716 Views
Well, these are as good a starting point as any. - 20/02/2010 05:22:34 PM 1486 Views
I think quoting NBs from other games is okay. - 20/02/2010 05:15:55 AM 1575 Views
Quoting or paraphrasing is fine IMO *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:31:45 AM 979 Views
Fox and Ranagrande - 20/02/2010 06:30:53 AM 1695 Views
Some comments... - 20/02/2010 07:54:02 PM 1618 Views
Alright. - 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM 1606 Views
Thanks - 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM 1477 Views
Re: Thanks - 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM 1449 Views
Ranagrande *NM* - 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM 890 Views
Really? - 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM 1591 Views
Go back and look at the NB for yourself. *NM* - 21/02/2010 04:29:54 AM 953 Views
That's hilarious. *NM* - 21/02/2010 06:47:57 PM 943 Views
Re: Thanks - 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM 1556 Views
I do have a question - 21/02/2010 07:12:57 PM 1639 Views
A prosaic explanation- (and an objection) - 21/02/2010 09:13:43 PM 1619 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself. - 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM 1528 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1600 Views
Not sure I follow - 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM 1611 Views
Because I might just be blinding myself here. - 22/02/2010 07:40:15 PM 1633 Views
Oh, okay. That does make sense. - 22/02/2010 07:52:10 PM 1735 Views
I think I do - 22/02/2010 07:47:56 PM 1503 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1518 Views
EBWOP - sorry, double post *NM* - 21/02/2010 11:34:21 PM 898 Views
Items of note from my NB archive: - 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM 1710 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM 1766 Views
I'm feeling the same thing. - 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM 1582 Views
Re: I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 08:07:19 PM 1554 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 - 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM 1598 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis - 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM 1613 Views
That sounds about right to me. - 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM 1602 Views
(My two cents) - 22/02/2010 08:35:17 PM 1614 Views
Dude. - 22/02/2010 08:53:30 PM 1630 Views
Re: Dude. - 22/02/2010 09:45:52 PM 1564 Views
Thanks. - 23/02/2010 07:04:29 AM 1641 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM 1624 Views
You didn't read the entirety of my quote post did you? - 22/02/2010 07:42:14 PM 1645 Views
Actually, I do have a small confession to make about that... - 22/02/2010 08:14:08 PM 1693 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM 1760 Views
Fair enough - 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM 1718 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1580 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1546 Views
Numbers? - 22/02/2010 09:36:51 PM 1719 Views
Re: Numbers? - 22/02/2010 10:21:13 PM 1719 Views
I don't think he's innocent. OR a DF - 22/02/2010 10:42:16 PM 1507 Views
Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM 1679 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:38:09 PM 1528 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM 1522 Views
I will destroy the world - 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM 1654 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM* - 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM 794 Views
Ok, that's totally different... - 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM 1519 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent. - 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM 1667 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM* - 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM 812 Views
No, this is my view: - 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM 1648 Views
And my view was: - 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM 1528 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know - 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM 1585 Views
I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 01:52:07 AM 1521 Views
Re: I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 06:47:45 AM 1564 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM* - 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM 897 Views
Can I ask why? - 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM 1551 Views
I'd be very interested in seeing an explanation as well *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:04:30 PM 907 Views
Ditto. *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:09:31 PM 900 Views
My, my, how totally unexpected - 24/02/2010 01:01:42 PM 1642 Views
Reasoning would be nice *NM* - 24/02/2010 10:13:43 PM 929 Views
Eh? *NM* - 25/02/2010 01:47:19 AM 885 Views
Hieshyn I will DESTROY you - 27/02/2010 01:41:25 AM 1542 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn - 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM 1712 Views
You're right, Isaac. - 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM 1699 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM* - 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM 832 Views
Hieshyns and Foxes and Beets! Oh my! - 26/02/2010 02:59:51 PM 1607 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM 1605 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 06:10:33 AM 1631 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 07:00:02 AM 1643 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM 1693 Views
Here's what I'm getting from this: - 27/02/2010 06:49:22 AM 1571 Views
Could be - 27/02/2010 06:16:30 PM 1538 Views
Re: Could be - 27/02/2010 07:15:07 PM 1649 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS. - 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM 1524 Views
Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:13:12 PM 1629 Views
Re: Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:40:16 PM 1469 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM 1599 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:55:13 AM 1476 Views
Gotcha, thanks. *NM* - 27/02/2010 08:07:21 AM 925 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM 1622 Views
Re: Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 08:24:14 PM 1768 Views
Interesting. - 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM 1528 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it - 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM 1592 Views
Oh, right. - 28/02/2010 04:32:13 AM 1470 Views
Vote: ranagrande - 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM 1539 Views
Hmmm - 27/02/2010 11:31:52 PM 1448 Views
Re: Hmmm - 28/02/2010 12:41:07 AM 1545 Views
What, if anything, has changed? - 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM 1529 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM* - 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM 870 Views
A little joke - 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM 2318 Views
Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 05:41:14 AM 1722 Views
Re: Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 06:29:58 AM 2258 Views
Woah, that's a pretty sneaky trick with the quote links. - 28/02/2010 07:14:22 AM 1531 Views
Oh, and RBIRL: midterms week. *NM* - 27/02/2010 09:35:25 PM 896 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text) - 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM 1562 Views
Why do you keep calling my death inevitable? - 28/02/2010 02:51:26 AM 1536 Views
Because you have often said you're a lightning rod - 28/02/2010 07:48:14 AM 1669 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis - 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM 1491 Views
fair enough - 28/02/2010 04:40:02 AM 1472 Views
Yeah, I would like an explanation. - 28/02/2010 05:00:55 AM 1503 Views
Vote: beetnemesis - 01/03/2010 03:18:00 AM 1601 Views
EBWOP - 01/03/2010 03:20:24 AM 1513 Views
"Jumpy?" - 01/03/2010 05:47:37 AM 1503 Views
Re: "Jumpy?" - 03/03/2010 05:35:50 AM 1608 Views
I GUESS I'll contribute my opinion. - 28/02/2010 06:15:36 AM 1606 Views
What a rebel - 28/02/2010 07:52:50 AM 1527 Views
me and beet - 28/02/2010 01:03:59 PM 1622 Views
my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM 1632 Views
Re: my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM 1679 Views
well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 04:03:26 AM 1562 Views
Re: well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 05:28:48 AM 1450 Views
Do you get a ring for voting abstinence? - 01/03/2010 04:56:57 AM 1686 Views
LOL *NM* - 01/03/2010 05:26:14 AM 864 Views
RBIRL until thursday. - 01/03/2010 07:06:50 AM 1494 Views
You undecided people really need to make up your minds - 01/03/2010 07:32:42 PM 1549 Views
Seriously, the suspense is killing me *NM* - 02/03/2010 05:30:26 PM 906 Views
Agreed, this is really getting ridiculous *NM* - 02/03/2010 08:06:12 PM 983 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up? - 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM 1516 Views
Please - 02/03/2010 09:12:36 PM 1582 Views
- 02/03/2010 11:20:19 PM 1693 Views
Re: - 02/03/2010 11:49:21 PM 1571 Views
Did you unvote? - 03/03/2010 04:22:52 AM 1590 Views
I always forget that! - 03/03/2010 01:04:09 PM 1504 Views
I'm sorry. - 03/03/2010 03:54:56 AM 1570 Views
But... I'm much more interesting than some stupid "book!" - 03/03/2010 04:11:02 AM 1502 Views
Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:25:27 AM 1561 Views
Re: Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:32:34 AM 1486 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this - 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM 1421 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days - 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM 1470 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these. - 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM 1504 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right. - 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM 1467 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced - 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM 1443 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok... - 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM 1534 Views
Well you figured very wrong - 04/03/2010 01:57:09 AM 1690 Views
All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM 1626 Views
This is a very interesting development - 04/03/2010 02:22:46 AM 1666 Views
Ditto. - 04/03/2010 02:28:18 AM 1768 Views
Re: All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 03:46:38 AM 1424 Views
Gosh. - 04/03/2010 04:01:04 AM 1535 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely. - 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM 1657 Views
We're only waiting on Bergioyn and Fist, I believe. - 04/03/2010 05:56:36 AM 1534 Views
Now we are down to Fist - 04/03/2010 03:47:22 PM 1471 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case - 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM 1551 Views
You brought this upon yourself. - 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM 1500 Views
Your fencing smiley has dulled my scathing retort - 03/03/2010 05:19:49 PM 1600 Views
- 03/03/2010 05:34:11 PM 1634 Views
I'm back. - 03/03/2010 07:32:24 PM 1637 Views
I'll give it a shot - 03/03/2010 08:19:01 PM 1651 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No' - 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM 1704 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:29:51 AM 932 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:31:43 AM 931 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:32:54 AM 850 Views
Re: Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:34:19 AM 879 Views
Ignore, hit 'reply' instead of 'edit' I think *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:36:02 AM 816 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 03:40:15 AM 931 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 04:44:27 AM 887 Views
No, sir *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:20:43 AM 985 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:25:10 AM 868 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 01:54:15 PM 896 Views
no *NM* - 05/03/2010 03:52:07 AM 891 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay - 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM 1432 Views
To the roleblocker: - 05/03/2010 01:46:50 AM 1613 Views
That's everyone, Vote: Beetnemesis *NM* - 05/03/2010 04:06:03 AM 900 Views
I think that's everyone. - 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM 1444 Views
I wouldn't jump on fist- he seems like he just rarely posts - 05/03/2010 06:21:34 AM 1740 Views
Also: Someone kill me! Eh, screw it. - 05/03/2010 06:27:29 AM 1675 Views
RBIRL - 05/03/2010 05:17:54 AM 1491 Views
Well, Beet already hammered. - 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM 1517 Views
Hah! It's like a ghost! Or a lame-duck president - 05/03/2010 07:22:42 AM 1571 Views
Not a bad idea - 05/03/2010 08:13:59 AM 1617 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched - 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM 1602 Views
Sorry Beet! *NM* - 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM 904 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM 816 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM 964 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED! - 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM 1650 Views
Hmm... tell me more about this robot-heaven - 06/03/2010 09:15:57 PM 1649 Views
In both places, the humans are our slaves - 07/03/2010 06:48:29 PM 1695 Views

Reply to Message