Active Users:712 Time:12/05/2026 05:00:09 PM
A few thoughts ranagrande Send a noteboard - 19/02/2010 03:22:32 PM
He seems to be as good a candidate as any right now, and the day's discussion does seem to be winding down. I'm not going to vote just yet, as I'd like to see how he responds, but I likely will if nothing else comes up.

My first take on this (I have not yet read your comments other than a skim to see you'd made them) is that this translates as:

Townie: He's as good a candidate as any other, apparently better form what you said, I'm not ready to vote for him yet... since you emphasized you were trying to get him to talk, my saying I'm willing to vote for him as is can only furhter encourage him.

DF: He's as good a candidate as any other, apparently better form what you said, I'm not ready to vote for him yet... but if the case get's stronger, he'd make a good frame-up.

Thoughts: Comments are insufficiently long to determine specific intent, originate from a player with no established MO, and do not seem particular out of the ordinary. However, base don your own aggressive approach on it, and your comment that "While I'm not entirely suspicious of him, I really want him talking. If he doesn't talk, we might as well lynch him anyway if we end up with no one else to vote for." could easily be seen as an outright request for support, or easily be viewed by a sympathetic townie as reason to join you in taking a firm stance to get Hieshyn talking.

First thing's first. This post is my main argument here. Obviously, my point is that he jumped on it pretty strong. THere was admittedly no evidence other than lack of talking. I scrounged up what I could and put some sauce on it and that was my post of Hieshyn. Then, immediately, probably thinking he could get a quick lynch because of the inactivity (of the game and Hieshyn), he jumped right on and said he would vote for him without giving any explanation.

Well, his response is stronger than player-average, but not out of the ordinary, I've seen parallel levels of aggression from townies and DFs, no real pattern to it, I'd go so far as to say townies do this more often then DFs, of course they make up the majority of the players so it's not exactly contradictory evidence. But yes, I definetly see what is being regarded as suspicious there, but I'm inclined to think he was just engaging in active, threatening support to get Hieshyn talking than really trying to say, against all common sense, that he was fine with randomly lynching someone. DF's do make mistakes like that but I can see a pretty straight forward Occam's Razor on this one.
Yeah, I mainly just wanted to see where it would go. And I have not been displeased with the results; the game is certainly more active now than it was before that conversation.

Another:

This on the other hand... We can't allow ourselves to be so focused on a single target that broadening our horizons should elicit such a negative response, and especially not on Day 1.

More accusations will make the game more active and create more conversation. More conversation will create more opportunity for darkfriends to trip themselves up. Even if we don't recognize it now, that could be invaluable later on.

Also, it's not like the case against F-T will disappear just because someone named a new suspect. I said earlier that my initial response to the Miller roleclaim was to believe him, and I still do for the most part, but I would welcome any evidence or conjecture to the contrary. Again, it is more activity and more conversation, which can only help us.

And now I have to say, if I wasn't suspicious of you before, I am now.

The suspicious part is his last statement here. It was in reference to Kronin saying that he'll be focusing on beet for trying to change our targets if FT turns out to be bad. Why are you so suspicious of Kronin for saying that he'll be focusing on beet? Honestly, to me, it just looks like your trying to make us leery of Kronin because he could be a threat to you. You may have your own interpretation but this is what it says to me.

That one seems pretty clear, beet was raising other targets, and Kronin (as the other target) told beet that he'd be gunning for him next if FT turned out guilty. Ranagrande is telling Kronin why he think it's important to explore other options and maximize debate, and that Kronin's threat to beet, which gives the appearance of trying to shut down alternate debate, makes ranagrande suspicious of him. In context, it is actually a fairly pro-town comment. Now, I agree with Kronin's sentiment, obviously if FT had turned out guilty we'd have strung beet up, but it's very clear from the context that ranagrande was accusing KRonin of being suspicious because his message could easily be taken as an attempt to shut down attempts to find alternate targets. Beet was the only one really doing much on that score, at that point I'd already said I would not, as I was angry over the respons eI'd gotten from exploring FT's case, and no one was really raising anything else. No, this comment really is more of minor point in ranagrande's favor than against.
This. Kronin even admitted in his response to me that it had been a stupid thing to say.

As Katie said, Blaine has yet to post in this game. I'd say we could wait a bit and see if we get a modkill, but Gher has stated that all players are accounted for so he must have messaged him or something.

There's sounds like nothing more than usual player agitation about inactivity, which I could see your viewing as suspicious when the impression was that ranagrande himself was pretty inactive, and their for might be flavoring your thoughts, but as this was not the case...

Now, this comment actually predates FT's RC, and follows MPD discussions, and is in reply to a long post by me in which I was discussing ways to avoid tampering by the DFs while narrowing odds if we were forced to use a random lynch. I was asking people for ways to narrow down random selectees, suggesting we do our nominal potluck out of inactives is hardly surprising.

Same deal here. So Blaine hasn't posted yet and you're suspicious of him?? I mean, maybe if you were frustrated or dissapointed or just straight up ready to lynch, but suspicious? I don't see why you have cause for that.

I would say I consider finding a total inactive suspicious for that reason isn't exactly the best logic, but it's also not bad either. Context being important, this comment seemed totally in place as a reply to my own comments, of course, I was getting ready to suggest we pick our 'pool of three or four' as players who posted least, as punshiment for inactivity and/or encouragement to talk more, so I viewed Blaine's comments as a handy thing that saved me having to openly say it. Now, ironically this makes his comment in reply to your Hieshyn vote more likely to have been of the 'firm support of the threat to lynch if Hieshyn doesn't speak up' scenario. Regardless of his alignment, both comments seem to indicate that ranagrande is of the 'threaten to kill people if they don't participate more' mindset (which I share, perhaps why it is easy for me to regard his comments that way) and as we've seen, his posting numbers indicate this statement is not out of place or hypocritical.
I am indeed a member of that school of thought, for two reasons. First of all, as we've all seen, voting stimulates conversation and being voted for is a great catalyst for getting less active players to participate more. Secondly, if we ever DO find ourselves in a situation where we have to settle for a random lynch, I would prefer to kill someone who is not contributing.

These two following posts are a big one too.

That sounds like solid reasoning to me

ranagrande Send a noteboard - 30/01/2010 10:07:05 PM

I think I might be inclined to believe you.

This is in reply to FT giving his reasoning for the Day 1 miller claim, immediatly in reply to my own comment to FT's original RC post. I had not yet inserted any of the counter-reasoning for why there were advantages for a DF to make this claim. This sounds like a townie expressing limited support, who later changed after arguments were presented and no alternates showed up, this seems quit ein keeping with his later statements. Let me point out DK rpeplied to say the same, later expressed the same doubts, and later voted for the same reasons as ranagrande. So did many other players.

Yeah it is...

ranagrande Send a noteboard - 31/01/2010 04:55:29 PM

I had stopped paying close attention after my death in the last game too, but I still noticed Yunalesca's Miller claim. I don't really see how F-T could have missed it.

I maintain that it was very weird for FT not to know that and certainly it makes sense to be surprised that he didn't. Only later, as I pointed out, did we have reaosn not to think that was surprising, that Miller never appeared in any title of a message and that FT had posted he was very busy and distracted in a different game thread at a parallel time. Considering he was agreeing with me, DK, and Kronin at the time, that the comment seemed unlikely and dubious, this doesn't seem out of place. Once again, all it seems to note is that ranagrande was apparently saying and thinking along the same lines as the other players who voted for FT and were talkative, namely, me, Kronin, and DK, I tihnk you'd agree, it is most unlikely all four of us are on the same side as DFs.
I still agree. I don't think it really changed anything, but it was odd.

This second post is in response to a post saying that the miller thing was something FT shouldn't have missed. Basically, I'm saying that his thoughts are quite scattered. He's changing sides here, visibly, which is something DFs tend to do. It's obviously not much but in a day, he went from agreeing with FT back to saying he didn't like what he's saying to eventually voting for him. This wishy washy posting makes me quite leery.

He changed no sides. Again, his comment sparallel those of most others who expressed initial tentative support of FT's claim then withdrew it as the possibility it might be a legit DF tactic and the lack of alternate candidates became clear. Wishy=washy posting is common to DFs, but it is also common to townies, and everyone was wishy-washy on FT who voted for him, mostly in the same way and degree as ranagrande expresses just in keeping with their own style.
I believed F-T initially, and even at the end, I didn't really think he was guilty. But I had been convinced over the course of the day that we stood to gain from his death, even if he was a townie. So I voted for him. With no other serious candidates on Day 1 and no leads of my own, I thought it was the best thing to do.
Reply to message
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over. - 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM 3793 Views
List of Players - 08/02/2010 06:58:04 PM 1571 Views
This is great, thanks! *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:19:25 AM 972 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:25:25 AM 1647 Views
Crap! - 15/02/2010 03:26:24 AM 1533 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM 1715 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM 1508 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia? - 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM 1699 Views
I am not Hopper - 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM 1570 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME - 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM 1621 Views
Now that's a questionable claim. - 09/02/2010 02:36:25 AM 1611 Views
Hah! You underestimate my ego, madam! - 09/02/2010 06:25:28 AM 1486 Views
A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM 1567 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 10:31:32 PM 1552 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 11:23:07 PM 1388 Views
Third Party - 08/02/2010 09:43:57 PM 1467 Views
Re: Third Party - 08/02/2010 10:34:38 PM 1519 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM 1554 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 03:53:18 AM 1568 Views
I thinking Lynching F-T was the right thing to do. - 09/02/2010 04:45:13 AM 1515 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM* - 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM 928 Views
You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM 1520 Views
NO! - 09/02/2010 01:31:57 AM 1491 Views
Re: You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM 1485 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM 1513 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM 1525 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM 1618 Views
Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:05:04 AM 1509 Views
Re: Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:50:41 AM 1629 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM 1543 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement. - 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM 1698 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family. - 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM 1661 Views
See, that way the betrayal is personal. - 09/02/2010 04:41:47 AM 1749 Views
Ouch *NM* - 09/02/2010 04:58:13 PM 960 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 01:02:30 AM 868 Views
Hypocop (Table) - 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM 1632 Views
Beetnemesis, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:17:10 AM 868 Views
Okay - 09/02/2010 01:29:09 AM 1374 Views
Kronin, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:53:09 AM 827 Views
Isaac, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:12:07 AM 963 Views
Isaac, innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:37:54 AM 876 Views
Investigated fistofpainx, found him to be innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 06:27:37 AM 887 Views
DK, found her innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:48:11 PM 886 Views
Fox and Ravens, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 03:57:50 PM 846 Views
Vote Record (Table) - 09/02/2010 01:30:51 AM 1589 Views
I'll add: list of players who did NOT vote yesterday - 09/02/2010 06:46:38 AM 1531 Views
RBIRL - 09/02/2010 04:45:19 AM 1458 Views
Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM 1482 Views
Re: Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 07:20:02 AM 1452 Views
Yeah, I agree with the Blaine rationalization - 09/02/2010 08:57:19 AM 1495 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh - 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM 1352 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM 905 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM 887 Views
Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 04:57:26 PM 1646 Views
Re: Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 07:27:00 PM 1438 Views
I want to throw this out here. - 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM 1548 Views
What changed your mind? *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM 868 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone. - 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM 1572 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 02:56:52 AM 810 Views
I thought you'd like that. *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:00:19 PM 803 Views
I was going to post a few thoughts here this morning... - 09/02/2010 01:49:26 PM 1527 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM 1586 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic". - 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM 1415 Views
Good point. Is an arsonist usually a third party? *NM* - 10/02/2010 12:28:10 AM 818 Views
That's so arbitrary, though. - 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM 1335 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante. - 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM 1581 Views
That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM 1501 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM 1548 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that - 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM 1496 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense. - 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM 1618 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable - 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM 1429 Views
Oh, my bad then! *NM* - 10/02/2010 10:19:13 PM 880 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism - 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM 1833 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM* - 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM 878 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM* - 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM 894 Views
I was the best vigilante you guys have ever had! *NM* - 12/02/2010 02:19:57 AM 873 Views
The only vigilante we've ever had. - 12/02/2010 02:25:20 AM 1432 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM* - 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM 838 Views
Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:19:10 AM 1556 Views
Re: Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:56:10 AM 1454 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:50:51 AM 1705 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 01:11:50 AM 1453 Views
Because we have a SK *NM* - 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM 828 Views
I agree that we probably have a SK - 10/02/2010 07:50:33 PM 1463 Views
Nah, I was just saying *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:06:54 AM 875 Views
wait a minute - 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM 1529 Views
Sensors? *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:42:36 PM 765 Views
Another thing - 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM 1619 Views
F-T, I assume - 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM 1446 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM* - 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM 867 Views
I don't think it could be a RB - 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM 1553 Views
Probably not, but not for that reason - 10/02/2010 08:32:57 PM 1523 Views
Huh. - 10/02/2010 09:11:29 PM 1505 Views
Did anyone get any messages last night? - 10/02/2010 08:23:03 PM 1446 Views
Nope *NM* - 10/02/2010 08:35:18 PM 843 Views
Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:14:46 PM 1488 Views
Re: Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:41:19 PM 1617 Views
RBIRL - 11/02/2010 04:52:12 PM 1449 Views
Good luck! *NM* - 11/02/2010 07:05:40 PM 810 Views
Re: RBIRL - 11/02/2010 09:59:39 PM 1696 Views
We're stalling out a bit - 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM 1465 Views
Yep. - 12/02/2010 02:58:02 AM 1362 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine... - 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM 1536 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game - 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM 1703 Views
Yawn... - 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM 1652 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM 1613 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM 1555 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:24:40 AM 1489 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself - 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM 1699 Views
Dammit, I had a post and then it got deleted. - 14/02/2010 01:45:31 AM 1473 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again. - 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM 1354 Views
Always happy to answer your questions - 14/02/2010 07:35:35 AM 1406 Views
Thanks for the answers. - 15/02/2010 07:29:31 PM 1486 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:02:34 AM 1574 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:48:22 AM 1450 Views
On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM 1529 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM 1415 Views
Oh, right, I modded that one. - 14/02/2010 04:11:46 AM 1440 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records - 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM 1489 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one - 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM 1441 Views
I'm in second? Woo! - 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM 1493 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod - 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM 1624 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT. - 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM 1498 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you - 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM 1466 Views
Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM 1348 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM 1710 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart. - 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM 1698 Views
Oh, the MHael Steve incident! - 15/02/2010 04:42:31 AM 1492 Views
The game? Oh, right, that. - 15/02/2010 04:41:43 AM 1407 Views
Actually... - 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM 1556 Views
Sorry, it was my first game. - 16/02/2010 03:34:16 AM 1676 Views
That was my point actually. - 16/02/2010 06:25:17 AM 1573 Views
Those were the good old days. - 18/02/2010 01:21:44 AM 1517 Views
random thoughts - 15/02/2010 12:46:55 PM 1460 Views
I wasn't in that game. - 18/02/2010 01:19:06 AM 1432 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande - 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM 1755 Views
Argh... quote please - 12/02/2010 08:54:08 PM 1511 Views
Haha, fair enough - 12/02/2010 11:30:54 PM 1330 Views
I was getting all set to defend myself - 13/02/2010 01:21:58 AM 1582 Views
RBIRL - 14/02/2010 06:11:55 AM 1538 Views
Back - 18/02/2010 02:14:25 AM 1540 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM 1333 Views
Re: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM 1626 Views
That's giving up awfully early. - 15/02/2010 07:35:37 PM 1402 Views
Never give up! Never surrender! - 15/02/2010 08:31:19 PM 1558 Views
Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM 1443 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM 1459 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF - 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM 1376 Views
I don't think so - 16/02/2010 12:09:13 AM 1493 Views
I assumed - 16/02/2010 12:14:16 AM 1450 Views
Re: I assumed - 16/02/2010 01:28:43 AM 1542 Views
In a way Isaac is right - 16/02/2010 05:24:08 AM 1513 Views
If he was the SK - 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM 1565 Views
How many games did you guys play on wotmania, anyway? - 15/02/2010 08:43:04 PM 1449 Views
9 *NM* - 15/02/2010 08:53:23 PM 893 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM 1424 Views
Oh that's right! - 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM 1434 Views
We just took that game over. - 15/02/2010 10:12:43 PM 1512 Views
Oh yeah, we owned that one - 15/02/2010 11:48:12 PM 1395 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 1530 Views
Lol irony - 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM 1486 Views
what I thought was pretty funny - 16/02/2010 12:41:47 AM 1495 Views
Heh heh the Cairhienins would be proud *NM* - 16/02/2010 01:11:13 AM 879 Views
Oh, Isaac got High Seat there, didn't he? - 16/02/2010 01:33:05 AM 1484 Views
That was a fun one. - 18/02/2010 01:32:02 AM 1528 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people - 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM 1579 Views
well I really dont have anything worthwhile to say *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:06:11 PM 932 Views
Eh... not good enough - 16/02/2010 12:19:22 AM 1487 Views
Holiday weekend - 15/02/2010 11:49:37 PM 1443 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing. - 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM 1599 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM 1684 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM 1511 Views
It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 04:46:54 AM 1572 Views
Re: It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 05:30:34 AM 1501 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched - 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM 1554 Views
Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM 1537 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM 1601 Views
Since when are you against traps? - 16/02/2010 04:07:05 PM 1435 Views
Since game 4 or 5, roughly - 16/02/2010 10:57:19 PM 1493 Views
I'm glad it did too. - 16/02/2010 01:16:14 PM 1528 Views
Regarding Inactivity and whatnot - 16/02/2010 06:22:14 AM 1566 Views
RBIRL - exams Thursday *NM* - 17/02/2010 02:11:27 AM 895 Views
So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM 1532 Views
Re: So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 03:55:33 AM 1533 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7 - 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM 1562 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM 1606 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM 1497 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything - 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM 1397 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off. - 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM 1425 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM 1449 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM 1659 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM 1444 Views
My post, "Re: Hieshyn" - 18/02/2010 06:32:12 PM 1665 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM 1431 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it - 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM 1457 Views
A few thoughts - 19/02/2010 03:22:32 PM 1440 Views
Alright then. - 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM 1236 Views
EBWOP - 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM 1601 Views
Haha, I'm sorry - 19/02/2010 05:49:00 PM 1434 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM 1581 Views
Naive? - 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM 1561 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick - 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM 1556 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like - 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM 1311 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game... - 19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM 1412 Views
That's true- I've said as much earlier in this thread - 20/02/2010 02:08:47 AM 1450 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM 1392 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM 1397 Views
Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 06:03:18 AM 1478 Views
Re: Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 05:24:16 PM 1439 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN! - 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM 1455 Views
Hey. - 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM 1501 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:19:30 PM 1537 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 06:50:35 PM 1465 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM 1617 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF - 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM 1380 Views
Don't put words in my mouth. - 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM 1598 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM 875 Views
Well OK, a BIT more, because we know he was townie *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:34 PM 872 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM 853 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 18/02/2010 08:19:04 PM 837 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts? - 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM 1490 Views
I think that - 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM 1532 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions... - 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM 1465 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM 1443 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM 1377 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM 1525 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence. - 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM 1421 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going - 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM 1483 Views
About voting - 19/02/2010 03:33:34 PM 1515 Views
Idk if that question about voting can be answered. - 20/02/2010 06:15:21 AM 1539 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM 1535 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM 1532 Views
I agree - 20/02/2010 02:52:53 PM 1329 Views
Should be fine.. although, maybe only paraphrase? - 20/02/2010 02:03:30 AM 1426 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no - 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM 1459 Views
Seems pretty thorough to me! I pretty much agree. *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:12:40 AM 852 Views
After seeing this thread.... - 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM 1371 Views
Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM 1500 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM 1581 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM 1602 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM 1644 Views
Well, these are as good a starting point as any. - 20/02/2010 05:22:34 PM 1414 Views
I think quoting NBs from other games is okay. - 20/02/2010 05:15:55 AM 1500 Views
Quoting or paraphrasing is fine IMO *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:31:45 AM 935 Views
Fox and Ranagrande - 20/02/2010 06:30:53 AM 1608 Views
Some comments... - 20/02/2010 07:54:02 PM 1527 Views
Alright. - 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM 1528 Views
Thanks - 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM 1403 Views
Re: Thanks - 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM 1378 Views
Ranagrande *NM* - 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM 832 Views
Really? - 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM 1515 Views
Go back and look at the NB for yourself. *NM* - 21/02/2010 04:29:54 AM 904 Views
That's hilarious. *NM* - 21/02/2010 06:47:57 PM 868 Views
Re: Thanks - 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM 1486 Views
I do have a question - 21/02/2010 07:12:57 PM 1555 Views
A prosaic explanation- (and an objection) - 21/02/2010 09:13:43 PM 1535 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself. - 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM 1440 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1521 Views
Not sure I follow - 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM 1530 Views
Because I might just be blinding myself here. - 22/02/2010 07:40:15 PM 1558 Views
Oh, okay. That does make sense. - 22/02/2010 07:52:10 PM 1654 Views
I think I do - 22/02/2010 07:47:56 PM 1446 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1441 Views
EBWOP - sorry, double post *NM* - 21/02/2010 11:34:21 PM 854 Views
Items of note from my NB archive: - 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM 1623 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM 1676 Views
I'm feeling the same thing. - 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM 1506 Views
Re: I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 08:07:19 PM 1463 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 - 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM 1542 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis - 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM 1541 Views
That sounds about right to me. - 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM 1513 Views
(My two cents) - 22/02/2010 08:35:17 PM 1532 Views
Dude. - 22/02/2010 08:53:30 PM 1535 Views
Re: Dude. - 22/02/2010 09:45:52 PM 1464 Views
Thanks. - 23/02/2010 07:04:29 AM 1561 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM 1544 Views
You didn't read the entirety of my quote post did you? - 22/02/2010 07:42:14 PM 1566 Views
Actually, I do have a small confession to make about that... - 22/02/2010 08:14:08 PM 1618 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM 1671 Views
Fair enough - 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM 1645 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1512 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1460 Views
Numbers? - 22/02/2010 09:36:51 PM 1627 Views
Re: Numbers? - 22/02/2010 10:21:13 PM 1641 Views
I don't think he's innocent. OR a DF - 22/02/2010 10:42:16 PM 1427 Views
Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM 1597 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:38:09 PM 1460 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM 1450 Views
I will destroy the world - 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM 1583 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM* - 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM 753 Views
Ok, that's totally different... - 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM 1437 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent. - 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM 1568 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM* - 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM 760 Views
No, this is my view: - 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM 1576 Views
And my view was: - 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM 1457 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know - 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM 1510 Views
I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 01:52:07 AM 1432 Views
Re: I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 06:47:45 AM 1495 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM* - 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM 849 Views
Can I ask why? - 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM 1472 Views
I'd be very interested in seeing an explanation as well *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:04:30 PM 865 Views
Ditto. *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:09:31 PM 857 Views
My, my, how totally unexpected - 24/02/2010 01:01:42 PM 1554 Views
Reasoning would be nice *NM* - 24/02/2010 10:13:43 PM 872 Views
Eh? *NM* - 25/02/2010 01:47:19 AM 842 Views
Hieshyn I will DESTROY you - 27/02/2010 01:41:25 AM 1467 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn - 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM 1643 Views
You're right, Isaac. - 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM 1623 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM* - 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM 769 Views
Hieshyns and Foxes and Beets! Oh my! - 26/02/2010 02:59:51 PM 1534 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM 1540 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 06:10:33 AM 1557 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 07:00:02 AM 1576 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM 1616 Views
Here's what I'm getting from this: - 27/02/2010 06:49:22 AM 1497 Views
Could be - 27/02/2010 06:16:30 PM 1466 Views
Re: Could be - 27/02/2010 07:15:07 PM 1573 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS. - 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM 1439 Views
Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:13:12 PM 1540 Views
Re: Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:40:16 PM 1366 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM 1521 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:55:13 AM 1405 Views
Gotcha, thanks. *NM* - 27/02/2010 08:07:21 AM 876 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM 1547 Views
Re: Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 08:24:14 PM 1690 Views
Interesting. - 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM 1448 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it - 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM 1508 Views
Oh, right. - 28/02/2010 04:32:13 AM 1388 Views
Vote: ranagrande - 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM 1454 Views
Hmmm - 27/02/2010 11:31:52 PM 1372 Views
Re: Hmmm - 28/02/2010 12:41:07 AM 1487 Views
What, if anything, has changed? - 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM 1460 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM* - 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM 821 Views
A little joke - 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM 2249 Views
Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 05:41:14 AM 1627 Views
Re: Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 06:29:58 AM 2171 Views
Woah, that's a pretty sneaky trick with the quote links. - 28/02/2010 07:14:22 AM 1454 Views
Oh, and RBIRL: midterms week. *NM* - 27/02/2010 09:35:25 PM 845 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text) - 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM 1484 Views
Why do you keep calling my death inevitable? - 28/02/2010 02:51:26 AM 1463 Views
Because you have often said you're a lightning rod - 28/02/2010 07:48:14 AM 1587 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis - 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM 1428 Views
fair enough - 28/02/2010 04:40:02 AM 1396 Views
Yeah, I would like an explanation. - 28/02/2010 05:00:55 AM 1429 Views
Vote: beetnemesis - 01/03/2010 03:18:00 AM 1521 Views
EBWOP - 01/03/2010 03:20:24 AM 1448 Views
"Jumpy?" - 01/03/2010 05:47:37 AM 1427 Views
Re: "Jumpy?" - 03/03/2010 05:35:50 AM 1546 Views
I GUESS I'll contribute my opinion. - 28/02/2010 06:15:36 AM 1532 Views
What a rebel - 28/02/2010 07:52:50 AM 1433 Views
me and beet - 28/02/2010 01:03:59 PM 1544 Views
my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM 1575 Views
Re: my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM 1604 Views
well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 04:03:26 AM 1489 Views
Re: well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 05:28:48 AM 1383 Views
Do you get a ring for voting abstinence? - 01/03/2010 04:56:57 AM 1603 Views
LOL *NM* - 01/03/2010 05:26:14 AM 819 Views
RBIRL until thursday. - 01/03/2010 07:06:50 AM 1423 Views
You undecided people really need to make up your minds - 01/03/2010 07:32:42 PM 1471 Views
Seriously, the suspense is killing me *NM* - 02/03/2010 05:30:26 PM 865 Views
Agreed, this is really getting ridiculous *NM* - 02/03/2010 08:06:12 PM 938 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up? - 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM 1437 Views
Please - 02/03/2010 09:12:36 PM 1518 Views
- 02/03/2010 11:20:19 PM 1623 Views
Re: - 02/03/2010 11:49:21 PM 1495 Views
Did you unvote? - 03/03/2010 04:22:52 AM 1522 Views
I always forget that! - 03/03/2010 01:04:09 PM 1435 Views
I'm sorry. - 03/03/2010 03:54:56 AM 1508 Views
But... I'm much more interesting than some stupid "book!" - 03/03/2010 04:11:02 AM 1438 Views
Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:25:27 AM 1487 Views
Re: Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:32:34 AM 1405 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this - 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM 1351 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days - 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM 1383 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these. - 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM 1422 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right. - 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM 1400 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced - 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM 1374 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok... - 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM 1452 Views
Well you figured very wrong - 04/03/2010 01:57:09 AM 1622 Views
All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM 1550 Views
This is a very interesting development - 04/03/2010 02:22:46 AM 1588 Views
Ditto. - 04/03/2010 02:28:18 AM 1708 Views
Re: All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 03:46:38 AM 1353 Views
Gosh. - 04/03/2010 04:01:04 AM 1464 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely. - 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM 1586 Views
We're only waiting on Bergioyn and Fist, I believe. - 04/03/2010 05:56:36 AM 1461 Views
Now we are down to Fist - 04/03/2010 03:47:22 PM 1394 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case - 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM 1474 Views
You brought this upon yourself. - 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM 1428 Views
Your fencing smiley has dulled my scathing retort - 03/03/2010 05:19:49 PM 1520 Views
- 03/03/2010 05:34:11 PM 1545 Views
I'm back. - 03/03/2010 07:32:24 PM 1566 Views
I'll give it a shot - 03/03/2010 08:19:01 PM 1569 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No' - 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM 1626 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:29:51 AM 888 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:31:43 AM 888 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:32:54 AM 804 Views
Re: Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:34:19 AM 844 Views
Ignore, hit 'reply' instead of 'edit' I think *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:36:02 AM 767 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 03:40:15 AM 885 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 04:44:27 AM 839 Views
No, sir *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:20:43 AM 939 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:25:10 AM 820 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 01:54:15 PM 855 Views
no *NM* - 05/03/2010 03:52:07 AM 848 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay - 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM 1363 Views
To the roleblocker: - 05/03/2010 01:46:50 AM 1550 Views
That's everyone, Vote: Beetnemesis *NM* - 05/03/2010 04:06:03 AM 861 Views
I think that's everyone. - 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM 1361 Views
I wouldn't jump on fist- he seems like he just rarely posts - 05/03/2010 06:21:34 AM 1674 Views
Also: Someone kill me! Eh, screw it. - 05/03/2010 06:27:29 AM 1596 Views
RBIRL - 05/03/2010 05:17:54 AM 1411 Views
Well, Beet already hammered. - 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM 1451 Views
Hah! It's like a ghost! Or a lame-duck president - 05/03/2010 07:22:42 AM 1490 Views
Not a bad idea - 05/03/2010 08:13:59 AM 1542 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched - 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM 1518 Views
Sorry Beet! *NM* - 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM 846 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM 767 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM 920 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED! - 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM 1583 Views
Hmm... tell me more about this robot-heaven - 06/03/2010 09:15:57 PM 1573 Views
In both places, the humans are our slaves - 07/03/2010 06:48:29 PM 1616 Views

Reply to Message