Well, you can vote how you please, but I would like to know what you consider the remaining evidence on him, 'I still think he's guilty' doesn't leave much to support or refute. If you have a tangible case, it needs to be posted again, since I'm not sure what points you think I did or did not refute (Note: When I say refute, I emphasize these were not showing ranagrande more likely to be innocent, only that said evidence did not seem valid as indicator of guilt) and I'd like to see if something you consider evidence is something I thought I'd dealt with but either skipped covering or did not in your view sufficiently challenge.

I raise this because it seemed you'd genuinely accepted beet as the more suspicious of the two, and I can't think of anything either has done since then that would have really changed this.

I think I should start offering my services up as advocate-at-large for any who ask it, might make things more interesting, anyway, I'm pretty throughly tied to ranagrande right now, but I do want to emphasize that if you can present something that can't be dismissed (doesn't have to be ironclad, just has to represent genuine evidence) I will switch over, circumstances depending obviously, but right now I just can't see any legit lynch candidates beside the trio of you, and I do not see any real evidence on either your or ranagrande. IF anyone can change that, well, things change, but for right now...

Vote: Beetnemesis
Yes, I should have done that sooner but I'm hardly sure he's a DF and frankly my vote tends to be the kiss of death, also once i cast it it tends to give people an excuse the next day on a bad lynch to blame me, which get's on my nerves. I want to make it very clear that while I'm involved in this, I'm not tricking people into their votes.