Active Users:195 Time:19/05/2024 05:59:22 AM
I think that's everyone. Darth_Katie Send a noteboard - 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM
I'll probably tack my vote back on soon, but as soon as we kill beet we'll lose 1 or 2 people to NK. He may be the SK, but the nature of his tactic strongly implies he expected an ally to join him. It would have been nice if a couple players had waited till every 'No' was in before commenting on how we'd be unlikely to trust a RB RC, especially since the two players we were still waiting on are relatively new and probably don't remember the classic Cor Mason claim of game 4 and might have stepped into the trap.


Verdict's in. Either he's a SK or his DF buddies have decided to engage in some bus-throwing, to which I can't really say I blame them. It would have been a risky move.

Well, spilled milk, obviously if beetnemsis is a DF, and not a SK, we have a short list for his allies. HE probably has two, if he is, so we may as well to discuss the options for that so the SK can whack them, as opposed to one of us, tonight. If he turns out to be a SK, which is possible considering he might genuinely not have realized that we could and would pursue the RBer thing, then we're back to square one, but we'll have eliminated a whole NK and presumably will go into tomorrow with 6-3 town-DF, which isn't too bad a place to be since we have a lot of info, just most of it around beet's vote won't mean much.

Of course he could be a townie too, but I have to say that I find that option pretty slim now, it will be nice to vote on a more sure deal for a change.


I highly doubt he's a Townie. It would be a pretty selfish move on the part of the real RBer to not come forward ... and there's just too much evidence against Beet. It's a sketchy claim all around. And I don't think Gher is quite evil enough to include a decoy back-up Town RBer. ;)

Let us, though, assume beet will a Df - decent odds he's a roleblocker too, all things considered, but we'll see, probably in the next 24 hours.

Who is high-lit as possible allies? Or rather, who should we huddle up around so the cop can check them?

Well, obviously Fistofpainx has a beacon on him right now, and to a lesser degree Bergioyn. Let us instead though look at who almost certainly was not allied to beet.

Myself - I think we may safely assume I am not bussing beetnemesis

Kronin al'Sulc, White Flame of Tar Valon, Fox and Ravens, Darth_Katie - THe other voters for beet, and I do not think any of them bussed him, as his lynch was anything but a certainty even up to L-1, there is some wiggle room for the possibility Fox might have decided to bus, but fairly low.

That leaves us

Bergioyn

Fistofpainx

Hieshyn

Hobo

ranagrande

All right, we can dismiss ranagrande, he is obviously not an ally of beetnemesis. Hobo basically declared his intent to vote for beet, though he didn't vote, so he get's a maybe. Hieshyn was locked onto Fox, but was even when fox was the only other strong supporter of ranagrande, which has been beet's focus, so if Hieshyn was beet's ally, targeting Fox seems a strange move. So he's a 'maybe'.

Breaking this down, and remember all this assumes beetnemesis is a DF, or member of a multi-person faction, not a SK, our list of potential allies for him, in order from most to least is

Fistofpainx

Bergioyn

Hieshyn

Hobo

Fox

Now odds are two of those are DFs, if he is, and when I say 'most to least' I emphasize that there is a pretty big gap between number 1 and number 5. We can also make some good guesses on which of those are unlikely to be allied. Fox and Hieshyn, for instance, are basically mutually exclusive. Bergioyn we just have little data on, and I still feel Hobo is semi-prob-town. So we should expect copping to happen in that area and realistically during the hypocop, if we want to protect our cop, we need huddle up over those five, and don't forget that if one of them dies tonight it doesn't mean the cop might not have checked them, so you should probably pick your target for HC at twilight. I suggest, to make it easy, just roll a normal six sided dice and have fist assigned two numbers, then determine guilt or innocence with a flat coin flip or odds/even roll. We're expecting 2 out 5 baddies, so 50/50 is about right. If your HCer dies, just report their actual alignment, don't switch targets or flip a coin.


This is good advice for running the hypocop - we ought to remember that for future games. And Tomorrow of course.

Personally I am most suspicious of Fistofpainx right now ... abstaining from the vote + being the last to claim just adds up a bit. But I don't want to jump the gun. We'll see what happens overnight. As for right now, I think it's about time to end this Day and get on with life. I am rather pleased with how this turned out - I was having horrible flashbacks of last game Day 2, and now I am fairly sure that we've nabbed ourselves a Darkfriend Today. No small improvement, eh? I guess I probably shouldn't jinx us though ... :D

Okay, just wanted to outline a suggested battle strategy, obviously this only applies if beet is a DF or cultist, not a lone wolf or somehow actually a townie. If anyone else has any thoughts, nows the time, I'd love to hear from fist before we proceed but I doubt it will change much, so we can either wait and talk a bit longer, or proceed, I don't think we have to worry about a shortage of votes so I won't bother putting mine back on just yet, in case people still want to talk or someone votes just to end talk. Obviously, barring some stunning revelation, we know who I'm voting for.
Insert theme music here.
Reply to message
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over. - 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM 3309 Views
List of Players - 08/02/2010 06:58:04 PM 1071 Views
This is great, thanks! *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:19:25 AM 672 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:25:25 AM 1133 Views
Crap! - 15/02/2010 03:26:24 AM 1070 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM 1246 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM 1013 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia? - 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM 1155 Views
I am not Hopper - 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM 1069 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME - 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM 1153 Views
Now that's a questionable claim. - 09/02/2010 02:36:25 AM 1124 Views
Hah! You underestimate my ego, madam! - 09/02/2010 06:25:28 AM 1014 Views
A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM 1112 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 10:31:32 PM 1100 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 11:23:07 PM 894 Views
Third Party - 08/02/2010 09:43:57 PM 952 Views
Re: Third Party - 08/02/2010 10:34:38 PM 1048 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM 1068 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 03:53:18 AM 1020 Views
I thinking Lynching F-T was the right thing to do. - 09/02/2010 04:45:13 AM 1046 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM* - 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM 671 Views
You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM 1035 Views
NO! - 09/02/2010 01:31:57 AM 1021 Views
Re: You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM 993 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM 1028 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM 1046 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM 1092 Views
Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:05:04 AM 1011 Views
Re: Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:50:41 AM 1117 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM 1047 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement. - 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM 1206 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family. - 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM 1039 Views
See, that way the betrayal is personal. - 09/02/2010 04:41:47 AM 1255 Views
Ouch *NM* - 09/02/2010 04:58:13 PM 653 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 01:02:30 AM 615 Views
Hypocop (Table) - 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM 1106 Views
Beetnemesis, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:17:10 AM 598 Views
Okay - 09/02/2010 01:29:09 AM 923 Views
Kronin, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:53:09 AM 556 Views
Isaac, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:12:07 AM 653 Views
Isaac, innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:37:54 AM 590 Views
Investigated fistofpainx, found him to be innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 06:27:37 AM 597 Views
DK, found her innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:48:11 PM 621 Views
Fox and Ravens, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 03:57:50 PM 583 Views
Vote Record (Table) - 09/02/2010 01:30:51 AM 1096 Views
I'll add: list of players who did NOT vote yesterday - 09/02/2010 06:46:38 AM 1066 Views
RBIRL - 09/02/2010 04:45:19 AM 1019 Views
Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM 1027 Views
Re: Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 07:20:02 AM 963 Views
Yeah, I agree with the Blaine rationalization - 09/02/2010 08:57:19 AM 1027 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh - 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM 892 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM 636 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM 599 Views
Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 04:57:26 PM 1157 Views
Re: Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 07:27:00 PM 948 Views
I want to throw this out here. - 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM 1055 Views
What changed your mind? *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM 579 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone. - 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM 1057 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 02:56:52 AM 527 Views
I thought you'd like that. *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:00:19 PM 524 Views
I was going to post a few thoughts here this morning... - 09/02/2010 01:49:26 PM 1027 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM 1084 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic". - 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM 933 Views
Good point. Is an arsonist usually a third party? *NM* - 10/02/2010 12:28:10 AM 571 Views
That's so arbitrary, though. - 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM 901 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante. - 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM 1119 Views
That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM 1065 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM 1083 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that - 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM 1063 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense. - 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM 1134 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable - 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM 985 Views
Oh, my bad then! *NM* - 10/02/2010 10:19:13 PM 625 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism - 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM 1332 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM* - 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM 610 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM* - 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM 622 Views
I was the best vigilante you guys have ever had! *NM* - 12/02/2010 02:19:57 AM 595 Views
The only vigilante we've ever had. - 12/02/2010 02:25:20 AM 970 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM* - 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM 588 Views
Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:19:10 AM 1038 Views
Re: Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:56:10 AM 1016 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:50:51 AM 1192 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 01:11:50 AM 997 Views
Because we have a SK *NM* - 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM 544 Views
I agree that we probably have a SK - 10/02/2010 07:50:33 PM 1009 Views
Nah, I was just saying *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:06:54 AM 613 Views
wait a minute - 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM 1037 Views
Sensors? *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:42:36 PM 519 Views
Another thing - 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM 1157 Views
F-T, I assume - 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM 984 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM* - 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM 623 Views
I don't think it could be a RB - 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM 1097 Views
Probably not, but not for that reason - 10/02/2010 08:32:57 PM 1057 Views
Huh. - 10/02/2010 09:11:29 PM 1048 Views
Did anyone get any messages last night? - 10/02/2010 08:23:03 PM 1022 Views
Nope *NM* - 10/02/2010 08:35:18 PM 587 Views
Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:14:46 PM 1031 Views
Re: Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:41:19 PM 1177 Views
RBIRL - 11/02/2010 04:52:12 PM 992 Views
Good luck! *NM* - 11/02/2010 07:05:40 PM 560 Views
Re: RBIRL - 11/02/2010 09:59:39 PM 1195 Views
We're stalling out a bit - 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM 984 Views
Yep. - 12/02/2010 02:58:02 AM 969 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine... - 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM 1073 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game - 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM 1217 Views
Yawn... - 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM 1185 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM 1150 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM 1062 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:24:40 AM 1005 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself - 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM 1174 Views
Dammit, I had a post and then it got deleted. - 14/02/2010 01:45:31 AM 1005 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again. - 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM 899 Views
Always happy to answer your questions - 14/02/2010 07:35:35 AM 920 Views
Thanks for the answers. - 15/02/2010 07:29:31 PM 1017 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:02:34 AM 1092 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:48:22 AM 989 Views
On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM 1048 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM 990 Views
Oh, right, I modded that one. - 14/02/2010 04:11:46 AM 969 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records - 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM 1060 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one - 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM 954 Views
I'm in second? Woo! - 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM 1033 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod - 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM 1191 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT. - 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM 1020 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you - 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM 1035 Views
Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM 897 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM 1264 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart. - 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM 1174 Views
Oh, the MHael Steve incident! - 15/02/2010 04:42:31 AM 1010 Views
The game? Oh, right, that. - 15/02/2010 04:41:43 AM 935 Views
Actually... - 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM 1112 Views
Sorry, it was my first game. - 16/02/2010 03:34:16 AM 1177 Views
That was my point actually. - 16/02/2010 06:25:17 AM 1101 Views
Those were the good old days. - 18/02/2010 01:21:44 AM 1054 Views
random thoughts - 15/02/2010 12:46:55 PM 982 Views
I wasn't in that game. - 18/02/2010 01:19:06 AM 983 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande - 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM 1273 Views
Argh... quote please - 12/02/2010 08:54:08 PM 1056 Views
Haha, fair enough - 12/02/2010 11:30:54 PM 909 Views
I was getting all set to defend myself - 13/02/2010 01:21:58 AM 1142 Views
RBIRL - 14/02/2010 06:11:55 AM 1085 Views
Back - 18/02/2010 02:14:25 AM 1116 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM 907 Views
Re: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM 1159 Views
That's giving up awfully early. - 15/02/2010 07:35:37 PM 949 Views
Never give up! Never surrender! - 15/02/2010 08:31:19 PM 1089 Views
Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM 1001 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM 985 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF - 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM 899 Views
I don't think so - 16/02/2010 12:09:13 AM 1031 Views
I assumed - 16/02/2010 12:14:16 AM 1026 Views
Re: I assumed - 16/02/2010 01:28:43 AM 1062 Views
In a way Isaac is right - 16/02/2010 05:24:08 AM 1035 Views
If he was the SK - 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM 1146 Views
How many games did you guys play on wotmania, anyway? - 15/02/2010 08:43:04 PM 991 Views
9 *NM* - 15/02/2010 08:53:23 PM 631 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM 1013 Views
Oh that's right! - 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM 994 Views
We just took that game over. - 15/02/2010 10:12:43 PM 1043 Views
Oh yeah, we owned that one - 15/02/2010 11:48:12 PM 940 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 1074 Views
Lol irony - 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM 1022 Views
what I thought was pretty funny - 16/02/2010 12:41:47 AM 1031 Views
Heh heh the Cairhienins would be proud *NM* - 16/02/2010 01:11:13 AM 604 Views
Oh, Isaac got High Seat there, didn't he? - 16/02/2010 01:33:05 AM 1026 Views
That was a fun one. - 18/02/2010 01:32:02 AM 1076 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people - 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM 1092 Views
well I really dont have anything worthwhile to say *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:06:11 PM 677 Views
Eh... not good enough - 16/02/2010 12:19:22 AM 1008 Views
Holiday weekend - 15/02/2010 11:49:37 PM 972 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing. - 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM 1125 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM 1225 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM 1056 Views
It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 04:46:54 AM 1110 Views
Re: It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 05:30:34 AM 1057 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched - 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM 1116 Views
Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM 1064 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM 1145 Views
Since when are you against traps? - 16/02/2010 04:07:05 PM 976 Views
Since game 4 or 5, roughly - 16/02/2010 10:57:19 PM 1031 Views
I'm glad it did too. - 16/02/2010 01:16:14 PM 1038 Views
Regarding Inactivity and whatnot - 16/02/2010 06:22:14 AM 1123 Views
RBIRL - exams Thursday *NM* - 17/02/2010 02:11:27 AM 618 Views
So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM 1043 Views
Re: So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 03:55:33 AM 1122 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7 - 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM 1093 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM 1175 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM 1035 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything - 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM 973 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off. - 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM 964 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM 973 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM 1141 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM 1017 Views
My post, "Re: Hieshyn" - 18/02/2010 06:32:12 PM 1183 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM 991 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it - 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM 1033 Views
A few thoughts - 19/02/2010 03:22:32 PM 962 Views
Alright then. - 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM 810 Views
EBWOP - 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM 1080 Views
Haha, I'm sorry - 19/02/2010 05:49:00 PM 966 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM 1101 Views
Naive? - 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM 1122 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick - 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM 1058 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like - 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM 875 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM 945 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM 925 Views
Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 06:03:18 AM 1006 Views
Re: Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 05:24:16 PM 987 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN! - 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM 996 Views
Hey. - 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM 1039 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:19:30 PM 1053 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 06:50:35 PM 949 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM 1145 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF - 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM 943 Views
Don't put words in my mouth. - 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM 1088 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM 618 Views
Well OK, a BIT more, because we know he was townie *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:34 PM 617 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM 593 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 18/02/2010 08:19:04 PM 566 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts? - 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM 1021 Views
I think that - 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM 1076 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions... - 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM 982 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM 1001 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM 941 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM 1062 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence. - 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM 968 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going - 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM 1007 Views
About voting - 19/02/2010 03:33:34 PM 1039 Views
Idk if that question about voting can be answered. - 20/02/2010 06:15:21 AM 1084 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM 1042 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM 1093 Views
I agree - 20/02/2010 02:52:53 PM 902 Views
Should be fine.. although, maybe only paraphrase? - 20/02/2010 02:03:30 AM 978 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no - 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM 977 Views
Seems pretty thorough to me! I pretty much agree. *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:12:40 AM 593 Views
After seeing this thread.... - 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM 922 Views
Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM 1022 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM 1114 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM 1133 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM 1194 Views
Well, these are as good a starting point as any. - 20/02/2010 05:22:34 PM 972 Views
I think quoting NBs from other games is okay. - 20/02/2010 05:15:55 AM 1005 Views
Quoting or paraphrasing is fine IMO *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:31:45 AM 653 Views
Fox and Ranagrande - 20/02/2010 06:30:53 AM 1100 Views
Some comments... - 20/02/2010 07:54:02 PM 1074 Views
Alright. - 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM 1071 Views
Thanks - 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM 918 Views
Re: Thanks - 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM 940 Views
Ranagrande *NM* - 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM 572 Views
Really? - 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM 1011 Views
Go back and look at the NB for yourself. *NM* - 21/02/2010 04:29:54 AM 647 Views
That's hilarious. *NM* - 21/02/2010 06:47:57 PM 598 Views
Re: Thanks - 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM 1021 Views
I do have a question - 21/02/2010 07:12:57 PM 1124 Views
A prosaic explanation- (and an objection) - 21/02/2010 09:13:43 PM 1072 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself. - 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM 973 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1066 Views
Not sure I follow - 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM 1079 Views
Because I might just be blinding myself here. - 22/02/2010 07:40:15 PM 1079 Views
Oh, okay. That does make sense. - 22/02/2010 07:52:10 PM 1195 Views
I think I do - 22/02/2010 07:47:56 PM 951 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1022 Views
EBWOP - sorry, double post *NM* - 21/02/2010 11:34:21 PM 589 Views
Items of note from my NB archive: - 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM 1142 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM 1190 Views
I'm feeling the same thing. - 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM 1024 Views
Re: I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 08:07:19 PM 1024 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 - 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM 1057 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis - 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM 1066 Views
That sounds about right to me. - 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM 1022 Views
(My two cents) - 22/02/2010 08:35:17 PM 1064 Views
Dude. - 22/02/2010 08:53:30 PM 1061 Views
Re: Dude. - 22/02/2010 09:45:52 PM 1015 Views
Thanks. - 23/02/2010 07:04:29 AM 1065 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM 1100 Views
You didn't read the entirety of my quote post did you? - 22/02/2010 07:42:14 PM 1062 Views
Actually, I do have a small confession to make about that... - 22/02/2010 08:14:08 PM 1149 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM 1180 Views
Fair enough - 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM 1097 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1048 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 999 Views
Numbers? - 22/02/2010 09:36:51 PM 1159 Views
Re: Numbers? - 22/02/2010 10:21:13 PM 1148 Views
I don't think he's innocent. OR a DF - 22/02/2010 10:42:16 PM 965 Views
Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM 1089 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:38:09 PM 1007 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM 983 Views
I will destroy the world - 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM 1110 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM* - 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM 486 Views
Ok, that's totally different... - 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM 990 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent. - 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM 1060 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM* - 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM 511 Views
No, this is my view: - 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM 1120 Views
And my view was: - 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM 983 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know - 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM 1053 Views
I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 01:52:07 AM 989 Views
Re: I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 06:47:45 AM 995 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM* - 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM 599 Views
Can I ask why? - 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM 1003 Views
I'd be very interested in seeing an explanation as well *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:04:30 PM 599 Views
Ditto. *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:09:31 PM 615 Views
My, my, how totally unexpected - 24/02/2010 01:01:42 PM 1064 Views
Reasoning would be nice *NM* - 24/02/2010 10:13:43 PM 599 Views
Eh? *NM* - 25/02/2010 01:47:19 AM 585 Views
Hieshyn I will DESTROY you - 27/02/2010 01:41:25 AM 1001 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn - 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM 1146 Views
You're right, Isaac. - 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM 1149 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM* - 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM 512 Views
Hieshyns and Foxes and Beets! Oh my! - 26/02/2010 02:59:51 PM 1106 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM 1072 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 06:10:33 AM 1068 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 07:00:02 AM 1124 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM 1148 Views
Here's what I'm getting from this: - 27/02/2010 06:49:22 AM 1029 Views
Could be - 27/02/2010 06:16:30 PM 1043 Views
Re: Could be - 27/02/2010 07:15:07 PM 1119 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS. - 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM 981 Views
Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:13:12 PM 1026 Views
Re: Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:40:16 PM 893 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM 1055 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:55:13 AM 962 Views
Gotcha, thanks. *NM* - 27/02/2010 08:07:21 AM 618 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM 1064 Views
Re: Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 08:24:14 PM 1235 Views
Interesting. - 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM 1020 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it - 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM 1022 Views
Oh, right. - 28/02/2010 04:32:13 AM 914 Views
Vote: ranagrande - 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM 981 Views
Hmmm - 27/02/2010 11:31:52 PM 922 Views
Re: Hmmm - 28/02/2010 12:41:07 AM 1053 Views
What, if anything, has changed? - 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM 1017 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM* - 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM 551 Views
A little joke - 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM 1606 Views
Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 05:41:14 AM 1138 Views
Re: Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 06:29:58 AM 1551 Views
Woah, that's a pretty sneaky trick with the quote links. - 28/02/2010 07:14:22 AM 973 Views
Oh, and RBIRL: midterms week. *NM* - 27/02/2010 09:35:25 PM 594 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text) - 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM 978 Views
Why do you keep calling my death inevitable? - 28/02/2010 02:51:26 AM 971 Views
Because you have often said you're a lightning rod - 28/02/2010 07:48:14 AM 1112 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis - 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM 996 Views
fair enough - 28/02/2010 04:40:02 AM 989 Views
Yeah, I would like an explanation. - 28/02/2010 05:00:55 AM 985 Views
Vote: beetnemesis - 01/03/2010 03:18:00 AM 1050 Views
EBWOP - 01/03/2010 03:20:24 AM 985 Views
"Jumpy?" - 01/03/2010 05:47:37 AM 914 Views
Re: "Jumpy?" - 03/03/2010 05:35:50 AM 1039 Views
I GUESS I'll contribute my opinion. - 28/02/2010 06:15:36 AM 1068 Views
What a rebel - 28/02/2010 07:52:50 AM 981 Views
me and beet - 28/02/2010 01:03:59 PM 1099 Views
my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM 1132 Views
Re: my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM 1165 Views
well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 04:03:26 AM 1062 Views
Re: well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 05:28:48 AM 939 Views
Do you get a ring for voting abstinence? - 01/03/2010 04:56:57 AM 1155 Views
LOL *NM* - 01/03/2010 05:26:14 AM 566 Views
RBIRL until thursday. - 01/03/2010 07:06:50 AM 943 Views
You undecided people really need to make up your minds - 01/03/2010 07:32:42 PM 1042 Views
Seriously, the suspense is killing me *NM* - 02/03/2010 05:30:26 PM 581 Views
Agreed, this is really getting ridiculous *NM* - 02/03/2010 08:06:12 PM 648 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up? - 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM 998 Views
Please - 02/03/2010 09:12:36 PM 1060 Views
- 02/03/2010 11:20:19 PM 1142 Views
Re: - 02/03/2010 11:49:21 PM 1060 Views
Did you unvote? - 03/03/2010 04:22:52 AM 1102 Views
I always forget that! - 03/03/2010 01:04:09 PM 988 Views
I'm sorry. - 03/03/2010 03:54:56 AM 1044 Views
But... I'm much more interesting than some stupid "book!" - 03/03/2010 04:11:02 AM 1014 Views
Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:25:27 AM 1061 Views
Re: Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:32:34 AM 953 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this - 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM 899 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days - 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM 891 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these. - 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM 950 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right. - 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM 957 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced - 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM 925 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok... - 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM 981 Views
Well you figured very wrong - 04/03/2010 01:57:09 AM 1115 Views
All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM 1077 Views
This is a very interesting development - 04/03/2010 02:22:46 AM 1100 Views
Ditto. - 04/03/2010 02:28:18 AM 1223 Views
Re: All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 03:46:38 AM 919 Views
Gosh. - 04/03/2010 04:01:04 AM 1030 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely. - 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM 1125 Views
We're only waiting on Bergioyn and Fist, I believe. - 04/03/2010 05:56:36 AM 1030 Views
Now we are down to Fist - 04/03/2010 03:47:22 PM 917 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case - 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM 1040 Views
You brought this upon yourself. - 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM 975 Views
Your fencing smiley has dulled my scathing retort - 03/03/2010 05:19:49 PM 1023 Views
- 03/03/2010 05:34:11 PM 1062 Views
I'm back. - 03/03/2010 07:32:24 PM 1064 Views
I'll give it a shot - 03/03/2010 08:19:01 PM 1089 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No' - 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM 1090 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:29:51 AM 627 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:31:43 AM 615 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:32:54 AM 540 Views
Re: Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:34:19 AM 586 Views
Ignore, hit 'reply' instead of 'edit' I think *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:36:02 AM 522 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 03:40:15 AM 645 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 04:44:27 AM 585 Views
No, sir *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:20:43 AM 671 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:25:10 AM 563 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 01:54:15 PM 606 Views
no *NM* - 05/03/2010 03:52:07 AM 607 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay - 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM 885 Views
To the roleblocker: - 05/03/2010 01:46:50 AM 1088 Views
That's everyone, Vote: Beetnemesis *NM* - 05/03/2010 04:06:03 AM 592 Views
I think that's everyone. - 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM 890 Views
I wouldn't jump on fist- he seems like he just rarely posts - 05/03/2010 06:21:34 AM 1216 Views
Also: Someone kill me! Eh, screw it. - 05/03/2010 06:27:29 AM 1154 Views
RBIRL - 05/03/2010 05:17:54 AM 963 Views
Well, Beet already hammered. - 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM 1000 Views
Hah! It's like a ghost! Or a lame-duck president - 05/03/2010 07:22:42 AM 1069 Views
Not a bad idea - 05/03/2010 08:13:59 AM 1058 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched - 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM 1075 Views
Sorry Beet! *NM* - 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM 585 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM 512 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM 636 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED! - 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM 1102 Views
Hmm... tell me more about this robot-heaven - 06/03/2010 09:15:57 PM 1162 Views
In both places, the humans are our slaves - 07/03/2010 06:48:29 PM 1162 Views

Reply to Message