The Sith are stronger than individual Jedi, in general, for the simple reason that there can only be two Sith at a time whereas there are many Jedi (admittedly not so many anymore by the time of the original trilogy, but they could retrain and get more again).
That does not fit with the "bring balance to the force" prophecy. If that is to be correct, the balance is achieved by there being two Sith and two Jedi. If their relative strengths were that different, that prophecy would make no sense, as Anakin would (on the contrary) destroy the balance.
According to Lucas, the balance prophecy referred to Vader when he killed the Emperor. This destroyed the Sith and brought balance to the Force. It was misinterpreted by the Jedi though.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Why are the Sith always made to seem stronger than the Jedi?
11/08/2010 03:19:11 PM
- 1498 Views
To make them a scary menace
11/08/2010 03:54:50 PM
- 1080 Views
. *NM*
12/08/2010 10:58:16 AM
- 648 Views
Precisely.
12/08/2010 11:00:31 AM
- 1038 Views
This. And "Star Wars" is not really trying to be anything more than a campy space opera. &
12/08/2010 06:51:48 PM
- 1397 Views


Maybe it has to do with the rule of two?
11/08/2010 04:04:08 PM
- 1291 Views
12/08/2010 01:13:20 AM
- 1053 Views
This, and there's no maybe about it.
11/08/2010 04:25:45 PM
- 1121 Views
Mno
11/08/2010 04:52:27 PM
- 1118 Views
I'm not talking about prophecies or theory so much as about the story.
11/08/2010 05:14:48 PM
- 1054 Views
As I understand it, the prophecy didn't mean that
11/08/2010 06:08:20 PM
- 1168 Views
Wrong as it sounds: Balance to the force actually means no dark side practitioners. *NM*
11/08/2010 07:27:18 PM
- 647 Views
Evil is what throws it out of balance. Why do people persist in thinking it is ever necessary? *NM*
16/08/2010 06:14:29 PM
- 754 Views

It makes sense
12/08/2010 02:51:28 AM
- 1093 Views
"One to embody power. The other to crave it."
12/08/2010 07:46:26 AM
- 903 Views
I think being confident in the Dark Side requires a certain selflessness
13/08/2010 03:44:11 AM
- 1097 Views
Not they don't Edited
11/08/2010 04:21:01 PM
- 1019 Views
Yeah. Compare the number of years Jedi had power vs. the Sith. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:52:44 AM
- 668 Views
Isn't there a 600-year Sith empire at some point in the books? *NM*
12/08/2010 10:09:49 AM
- 488 Views
Because, without it, there's no tension or danger of the Good Guys losing. Goes for all media. *NM*
11/08/2010 05:08:34 PM
- 618 Views
Fourth wall arguments are stupid.
11/08/2010 06:05:22 PM
- 996 Views
Sorry. Guess I should immerse myself in official SW novels before replying.
11/08/2010 10:42:05 PM
- 1019 Views

Nonsense
11/08/2010 11:32:19 PM
- 1055 Views
In that case, it's because Lucas is a shitty writer with a risible ethical system. *NM*
12/08/2010 07:47:26 AM
- 558 Views
I don't get your question/rant. Shouldn't you be happy the Sith are stronger? considering your name *NM*
11/08/2010 05:21:41 PM
- 687 Views
I have a feeling people have said this, but I'm too tired to look.
12/08/2010 03:23:23 AM
- 1056 Views
They aren't. How many times have they actually done things?
12/08/2010 07:51:23 AM
- 910 Views
What exactly are you focusing on?
12/08/2010 11:01:58 AM
- 974 Views
It doesn't matter.
12/08/2010 08:18:19 PM
- 941 Views
Re: It doesn't matter.
13/08/2010 12:22:12 AM
- 969 Views
That's all true, but my point is simply that the Jedi are in charge more often than the Sith.
13/08/2010 01:12:38 AM
- 1090 Views

Because they're more powerful
12/08/2010 10:59:45 AM
- 1181 Views
Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 06:50:44 PM
- 1009 Views
Re: Force lightning didn't age him.
12/08/2010 08:02:28 PM
- 1004 Views