Active Users:285 Time:28/01/2023 09:54:16 AM
Hardly, Cannoli... Jacob Send a noteboard - 19/05/2011 02:18:36 PM
First of all, it's canon, not cannon, unless you are referring to the weapon of a Basilisk (I have to stay in character after all).


I am terribly sorry to have offended you by my typo. I have a tendency to type too fast sometimes and not think about the exact spelling of the words as they get hammered out.

Secondly, I have to say this stuff because no one else is. If everyone already agrees with what I think, what is the point of piling on just to get some attention and have people like me because I'm on their side? When stuff is negative, a lot of times, I am the sole voice defending it, if that is what I feel. See, for instance, the discussion of The Warriors Way.


Yes, you are the sole voice of the 'truth'. You like it that way. You often go out of your way to make it that way. You are not some righteous voice of truth in a land full of the mindless, those who simply go along and don't question what it is they consume. Oh, you certainly like to portray it that way, and I think sometimes you probably even believe it to be true. Yet the fact remains, that you offered a rebuke to the 'imaginary' people who enjoy Castle for what it is, little more than a soapy cop drama featuring a contrived star-crossed, mismatched, love story. I don't think most people who enjoy the show are all that confused by what it is. Yet, you feel it necessary to come in and rip apart the show, holding it to the standard of a great American novel, or a concise, detailed study into the human condition. It's neither of these things, and it doesn't pretend to be.

You like to tell people why they are wrong for feeling the way they do about... just about everything. Oh, you couch it as a critique of the thing itself, but you deliver your analysis in mock surprise, and almost as if you're a little offended, that anyone could possibly miss these things you're saying, that you're laying down as an absolute fact. You wade into conversations to try to educate people why they are wrong. The problem is that often you are creating a straw man argument in the first place. Take your recent Thor critique as an example. Your first couple statements was that you didn't know anything about the comic book Thor but had a thorough knowledge of the Mythology. You then spent numerous paragraphs ripping on how a Comic Book movie, attempting to tell the story of the Comic Book character, Thor, got the mythology wrong. You did this, of course, rather than spend 10 minutes to see if the movie got the comic book lore correct.

But you are doing to me, what you are accusing me of doing - ignoring the good and highlighting the bad just to be negative. Think about that. Even if you are right, who's feelings am I hurting, aside from people who hang on my every word but get my teachings wrong?


Cannoli, I know exactly what I am doing. I am confronting a long-time, almost universally agreed upon, MB bully. I am calling out your long pattern of behavior, your callous, and mean-spirited approach to a majority of your interactions on this and previous MBs. You can pretend you think that I am being mean to you. I am being honest with you. I know you to be an intelligent man, one who is fully capable of adding a lot of insight and interesting analysis to many topics. Mostly, you just tell people why they are wrong, and you do it in a way that attempts to shutdown any possible conversation or disagreement with you.
Reply to message
Ok, Castle was awesome. (no spoilers in my post, but the responses are dirty with 'em!) - 17/05/2011 04:14:01 AM 1005 Views
*spoilers* - 17/05/2011 09:46:02 AM 516 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 12:50:51 PM 557 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 01:16:36 PM 541 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 04:22:16 PM 529 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 02:15:52 PM 532 Views
Nothing specific, sorry - 17/05/2011 04:17:09 PM 530 Views
Good TV (*alluded to spoilers* ) - 17/05/2011 01:59:12 PM 693 Views
Yus! - 17/05/2011 04:15:48 PM 565 Views
I should have read yours first. - 18/05/2011 04:11:33 AM 513 Views
Copycat! =^-^= *NM* - 18/05/2011 06:12:30 PM 228 Views
- 18/05/2011 06:46:11 PM 569 Views
Bah... - 19/05/2011 02:25:39 PM 757 Views
Stop that. - 19/05/2011 04:47:35 PM 445 Views
Re: Good TV (*alluded to spoilers* ) - 17/05/2011 07:05:02 PM 543 Views
Pfft - 18/05/2011 04:00:39 PM 514 Views
Right. - 18/05/2011 05:19:52 PM 605 Views
Agree - 19/05/2011 06:56:09 PM 477 Views
I disagree with you - 24/05/2011 09:58:48 PM 452 Views
Re: Pfft - 18/05/2011 06:47:08 PM 572 Views
Re: Pfft - 19/05/2011 06:59:30 PM 505 Views
Re: Pfft - 19/05/2011 07:26:24 PM 432 Views
Nooooooooooooo! (spoilers) - 17/05/2011 02:15:28 PM 599 Views
Eee. XD - 17/05/2011 04:20:59 PM 456 Views
Re: Eee. XD - 17/05/2011 04:58:59 PM 655 Views
Why is everyone assuming a death? Did I miss something beyond the contrived ending? - 18/05/2011 04:06:37 PM 447 Views
I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not - 18/05/2011 04:44:45 PM 476 Views
But we know she's not going to die, so he's got a point. (+edit) - 18/05/2011 06:16:20 PM 497 Views
Yup. - 18/05/2011 06:51:16 PM 526 Views
Silly man. - 18/05/2011 07:11:38 PM 467 Views
Most definitely. - 19/05/2011 06:49:31 PM 488 Views
I really need to start watching it. - 17/05/2011 03:32:35 PM 428 Views
Yes, you do. - 17/05/2011 04:24:47 PM 517 Views
Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. - 18/05/2011 04:35:04 PM 619 Views
Do you lack joy in your life? - 18/05/2011 05:28:02 PM 680 Views
I think this is his joy. - 18/05/2011 06:38:14 PM 542 Views
- 19/05/2011 02:25:02 PM 659 Views
The difference between you & me is I'm mean to imaginary people, while you are mean to real people - 19/05/2011 12:26:51 AM 472 Views
Hardly, Cannoli... - 19/05/2011 02:18:36 PM 812 Views
Why you are wrong - 22/05/2011 04:03:57 AM 570 Views
*slow clap* - 24/05/2011 10:04:58 PM 510 Views
Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. - 18/05/2011 06:36:29 PM 527 Views
Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. - 22/05/2011 01:30:58 PM 509 Views
It was good - 22/05/2011 01:12:14 PM 557 Views

Reply to Message