Active Users:236 Time:27/05/2024 03:40:20 AM
Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. snoopcester Send a noteboard - 22/05/2011 01:30:58 PM

For a show called "Castle" the focus has been entirely too much on Beckett so much so that people are forgetting you can still have a show called Castle without her.


I imagine most people are well aware of that, they just like the show as it is - it isn't supposed to be a ground breaking show that only a few dozen people care about, it is a light hearted bit of fun based around Castle's interactions with the cops and his family that isn't taxing.

Anyway, with the suspense disposed of, why the hell was Castle a pallbearer?


You mean along with the three cops Castle works with and that Montgomery is closest to, owns the bar they hang out in after work, is extremely generous towards the force and has "handed over" Beckett (his protege who he feels duty bound to look after for his part in her mother's death) to?

I'm not saying this episode was not entertaining in the manner typical of Castle, but let's not get overboard about a couple of pieces of stunt-writing.


Ever get the feeling you miss the point... or that you work too hard to make sure you do?
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
Ok, Castle was awesome. (no spoilers in my post, but the responses are dirty with 'em!) - 17/05/2011 04:14:01 AM 1128 Views
*spoilers* - 17/05/2011 09:46:02 AM 632 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 12:50:51 PM 669 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 01:16:36 PM 652 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 04:22:16 PM 627 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 02:15:52 PM 648 Views
Nothing specific, sorry - 17/05/2011 04:17:09 PM 647 Views
Good TV (*alluded to spoilers* ) - 17/05/2011 01:59:12 PM 843 Views
Yus! - 17/05/2011 04:15:48 PM 671 Views
I should have read yours first. - 18/05/2011 04:11:33 AM 626 Views
Copycat! =^-^= *NM* - 18/05/2011 06:12:30 PM 294 Views
- 18/05/2011 06:46:11 PM 683 Views
Bah... - 19/05/2011 02:25:39 PM 893 Views
Stop that. - 19/05/2011 04:47:35 PM 547 Views
Re: Good TV (*alluded to spoilers* ) - 17/05/2011 07:05:02 PM 656 Views
Pfft - 18/05/2011 04:00:39 PM 630 Views
Right. - 18/05/2011 05:19:52 PM 746 Views
Agree - 19/05/2011 06:56:09 PM 590 Views
I disagree with you - 24/05/2011 09:58:48 PM 563 Views
Re: Pfft - 18/05/2011 06:47:08 PM 691 Views
Re: Pfft - 19/05/2011 06:59:30 PM 611 Views
Re: Pfft - 19/05/2011 07:26:24 PM 547 Views
Nooooooooooooo! (spoilers) - 17/05/2011 02:15:28 PM 718 Views
Eee. XD - 17/05/2011 04:20:59 PM 581 Views
Re: Eee. XD - 17/05/2011 04:58:59 PM 769 Views
Why is everyone assuming a death? Did I miss something beyond the contrived ending? - 18/05/2011 04:06:37 PM 575 Views
I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not - 18/05/2011 04:44:45 PM 598 Views
But we know she's not going to die, so he's got a point. (+edit) - 18/05/2011 06:16:20 PM 608 Views
Yup. - 18/05/2011 06:51:16 PM 649 Views
Silly man. - 18/05/2011 07:11:38 PM 581 Views
Most definitely. - 19/05/2011 06:49:31 PM 609 Views
I really need to start watching it. - 17/05/2011 03:32:35 PM 540 Views
Yes, you do. - 17/05/2011 04:24:47 PM 623 Views
Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. - 18/05/2011 04:35:04 PM 725 Views
Do you lack joy in your life? - 18/05/2011 05:28:02 PM 805 Views
I think this is his joy. - 18/05/2011 06:38:14 PM 656 Views
- 19/05/2011 02:25:02 PM 801 Views
The difference between you & me is I'm mean to imaginary people, while you are mean to real people - 19/05/2011 12:26:51 AM 580 Views
Hardly, Cannoli... - 19/05/2011 02:18:36 PM 947 Views
Why you are wrong - 22/05/2011 04:03:57 AM 666 Views
*slow clap* - 24/05/2011 10:04:58 PM 612 Views
Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. - 18/05/2011 06:36:29 PM 621 Views
Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. - 22/05/2011 01:30:58 PM 617 Views
It was good - 22/05/2011 01:12:14 PM 654 Views

Reply to Message