Active Users:507 Time:27/07/2024 04:45:40 AM
Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. snoopcester Send a noteboard - 22/05/2011 01:30:58 PM

For a show called "Castle" the focus has been entirely too much on Beckett so much so that people are forgetting you can still have a show called Castle without her.


I imagine most people are well aware of that, they just like the show as it is - it isn't supposed to be a ground breaking show that only a few dozen people care about, it is a light hearted bit of fun based around Castle's interactions with the cops and his family that isn't taxing.

Anyway, with the suspense disposed of, why the hell was Castle a pallbearer?


You mean along with the three cops Castle works with and that Montgomery is closest to, owns the bar they hang out in after work, is extremely generous towards the force and has "handed over" Beckett (his protege who he feels duty bound to look after for his part in her mother's death) to?

I'm not saying this episode was not entertaining in the manner typical of Castle, but let's not get overboard about a couple of pieces of stunt-writing.


Ever get the feeling you miss the point... or that you work too hard to make sure you do?
*MySmiley*

Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."

Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Reply to message
Ok, Castle was awesome. (no spoilers in my post, but the responses are dirty with 'em!) - 17/05/2011 04:14:01 AM 1162 Views
*spoilers* - 17/05/2011 09:46:02 AM 658 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 12:50:51 PM 693 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 01:16:36 PM 673 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 04:22:16 PM 656 Views
Re: *spoilers* - 17/05/2011 02:15:52 PM 670 Views
Nothing specific, sorry - 17/05/2011 04:17:09 PM 670 Views
Good TV (*alluded to spoilers* ) - 17/05/2011 01:59:12 PM 873 Views
Yus! - 17/05/2011 04:15:48 PM 698 Views
I should have read yours first. - 18/05/2011 04:11:33 AM 652 Views
Copycat! =^-^= *NM* - 18/05/2011 06:12:30 PM 305 Views
- 18/05/2011 06:46:11 PM 715 Views
Bah... - 19/05/2011 02:25:39 PM 921 Views
Stop that. - 19/05/2011 04:47:35 PM 575 Views
Re: Good TV (*alluded to spoilers* ) - 17/05/2011 07:05:02 PM 691 Views
Pfft - 18/05/2011 04:00:39 PM 661 Views
Right. - 18/05/2011 05:19:52 PM 770 Views
Agree - 19/05/2011 06:56:09 PM 618 Views
I disagree with you - 24/05/2011 09:58:48 PM 595 Views
Re: Pfft - 18/05/2011 06:47:08 PM 717 Views
Re: Pfft - 19/05/2011 06:59:30 PM 640 Views
Re: Pfft - 19/05/2011 07:26:24 PM 576 Views
Nooooooooooooo! (spoilers) - 17/05/2011 02:15:28 PM 746 Views
Eee. XD - 17/05/2011 04:20:59 PM 606 Views
Re: Eee. XD - 17/05/2011 04:58:59 PM 792 Views
Why is everyone assuming a death? Did I miss something beyond the contrived ending? - 18/05/2011 04:06:37 PM 599 Views
I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not - 18/05/2011 04:44:45 PM 637 Views
But we know she's not going to die, so he's got a point. (+edit) - 18/05/2011 06:16:20 PM 633 Views
Yup. - 18/05/2011 06:51:16 PM 673 Views
Silly man. - 18/05/2011 07:11:38 PM 605 Views
Most definitely. - 19/05/2011 06:49:31 PM 642 Views
I really need to start watching it. - 17/05/2011 03:32:35 PM 565 Views
Yes, you do. - 17/05/2011 04:24:47 PM 648 Views
Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. - 18/05/2011 04:35:04 PM 750 Views
Do you lack joy in your life? - 18/05/2011 05:28:02 PM 834 Views
I think this is his joy. - 18/05/2011 06:38:14 PM 684 Views
- 19/05/2011 02:25:02 PM 825 Views
The difference between you & me is I'm mean to imaginary people, while you are mean to real people - 19/05/2011 12:26:51 AM 609 Views
Hardly, Cannoli... - 19/05/2011 02:18:36 PM 981 Views
Why you are wrong - 22/05/2011 04:03:57 AM 691 Views
*slow clap* - 24/05/2011 10:04:58 PM 637 Views
Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. - 18/05/2011 06:36:29 PM 645 Views
Re: Okay, the perspective of a non-shipper viewer. - 22/05/2011 01:30:58 PM 641 Views
It was good - 22/05/2011 01:12:14 PM 681 Views

Reply to Message