Active Users:1473 Time:03/08/2026 03:07:08 AM
It's just simplistic. Like a Disney movie, but no songs. What really bugs me is that the Company beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 08/01/2010 08:48:32 AM
It's not a particularly deep plot. It's freaking gorgeous, and that's about it.


Although, there's a throwaway line in the movie that really sums it up for me. It's when scientist lady is shrieking about how the planet is worth more than just the rocks in it. It's totally, completely true, and the fact that the Company is too stupid to realize that irritates me.

You have found a planet with 1)Sentient lifeforms 2)Flying mountains and 3)ORGANISMS WHICH NATURALLY TELEPATHICALLY COMMUNICATE WITH EACH OTHER. ANY of those three represents an unprecedented leap ahead in our understanding of science, and all the Company cares about is the rock underneath!?

Sociology, Psychology, Art, even Theology would all be radically altered by studying the Na'vi (Hey, these aliens act so similar to us in some ways. Is all sentient life similar? Do they all have a God?)

You've found massive rock formations that are lighter than air- so light that they can support entire ecosystems. INSANE. What? How?!

TELEPATHIC INTERFACE. Avatar is set not even 200 years in the future. Obviously there's been some advances in neurotechnology- that's what the Avatar program is, after all. But can the humans control their vehicles with their thoughts? Can they store memories in trees, and share them with each other? Do the humans have anything even remotely close to a semi-sentient PLANET?


Sheesh. And that's not even going to the whole "the cure for AIDS could be in the rainforest" arguments...
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
Suspension of Disbelief with Politics - 05/01/2010 06:46:53 PM 1710 Views
Oh I hear ya! - 05/01/2010 08:35:38 PM 913 Views
I don't completely agree, but this is similar to everyone retroactively hating Tom Cruise's movies. - 05/01/2010 08:47:19 PM 961 Views
Which is just as silly, yes. *NM* - 05/01/2010 08:48:55 PM 435 Views
Who hates Top Gun? That movie R0X0RS! *NM* - 07/01/2010 06:19:48 AM 459 Views
You know, I never understood that - 07/01/2010 07:28:36 AM 849 Views
What?? Min Rep is fantastic! *NM* - 07/01/2010 08:19:30 AM 434 Views
*Stands on counter* I am the last Poet Bartender - 07/01/2010 02:08:56 PM 869 Views
LOL...~hands Dannymac a clue~ - 06/01/2010 04:51:43 AM 1081 Views
Just judging him based on what he writes... - 06/01/2010 04:17:49 PM 897 Views
the point is... - 06/01/2010 11:25:46 PM 859 Views
talk about needing a clue - 09/01/2010 06:01:14 PM 809 Views
Wait...I support same-sex marriage. Just not all that other crap. - 07/01/2010 06:18:40 AM 852 Views
trespasses against persons is subjective. - 07/01/2010 07:09:22 AM 914 Views
Actually, it isn't. - 07/01/2010 03:46:30 PM 813 Views
ah I wasn't aware you were referring to a legal term - 07/01/2010 05:37:10 PM 875 Views
Considering that it's made-up BS, why should it be? - 09/01/2010 11:01:31 PM 844 Views
what about those not capable of walking away? - 10/01/2010 03:51:10 AM 784 Views
Who has the right to say a parent is abusing the child, and what prevents abuses the other way? - 10/01/2010 09:13:45 AM 1042 Views
You are not wrong - 10/01/2010 04:43:55 PM 852 Views
Re: trespasses against persons is subjective. - 09/01/2010 11:12:57 PM 860 Views
but it is wrong to deny the legal ramifications of marriage - 10/01/2010 04:19:02 AM 988 Views
Civics & economics 101 - 10/01/2010 08:47:07 AM 974 Views
okay, I can agree on your points - 10/01/2010 05:14:32 PM 789 Views
That's not Economics 101. That's practically Anarcho-capitalism. - 13/01/2010 11:54:22 PM 811 Views
Duh. - 14/01/2010 03:00:56 AM 822 Views
The existence of that right isn't what I'm arguing. - 18/01/2010 09:01:07 AM 803 Views
Re: The existence of that right isn't what I'm arguing. - 18/01/2010 11:57:33 AM 1128 Views
Apaprently I misread your earlier post. Very good points. *NM* - 19/01/2010 01:17:01 AM 416 Views
I'll agree to the trespass against persons - 09/01/2010 06:07:29 PM 877 Views
What bullshit you write. - 10/01/2010 01:30:02 AM 789 Views
uhm...nothing in nature shares with all. - 10/01/2010 05:28:04 AM 839 Views
So what you're saying is people shouldn't take movies to heart ? - 06/01/2010 01:39:21 PM 880 Views
That's just the point. - 06/01/2010 04:15:48 PM 990 Views
Precisely *NM* - 06/01/2010 04:45:58 PM 456 Views
indeed. they are not "soldiers" - 07/01/2010 07:12:32 AM 870 Views
that's a weasel script - 07/01/2010 09:55:13 AM 834 Views
well, it seems like it was less "lazy script writing" - 07/01/2010 05:38:35 PM 838 Views
huh. Well, my hunch would be - 07/01/2010 10:34:35 PM 943 Views
what makes them "look like military"?? - 09/01/2010 06:15:24 PM 901 Views
arguing the natives as terrorists would be a stretch *NM* - 09/01/2010 10:39:13 PM 430 Views
guessing you've seen it by now - 10/01/2010 12:48:57 PM 783 Views
AMEN *NM* - 09/01/2010 06:09:27 PM 411 Views
if the foo shits, wear it *NM* - 09/01/2010 06:08:11 PM 467 Views
I completely disagree with you about Avatar. - 06/01/2010 02:18:22 PM 928 Views
would you have felt better if they were albino aliens? - 07/01/2010 07:16:20 AM 856 Views
It's just simplistic. Like a Disney movie, but no songs. What really bugs me is that the Company - 08/01/2010 08:48:32 AM 910 Views
Yeah, I liked The Neverending Story better. - 08/01/2010 01:41:37 PM 845 Views
You know what it is for me... - 06/01/2010 07:37:10 PM 933 Views
That's understandable - 07/01/2010 07:25:23 AM 832 Views
That's totally what it is, hah - 08/01/2010 08:57:10 AM 955 Views
See...that's where I'm different. - 08/01/2010 03:33:30 PM 820 Views
I suppose the lesson is to not read about celebrities' politics? - 08/01/2010 06:22:10 PM 726 Views
But that's kind of the point... - 08/01/2010 06:51:05 PM 842 Views
Uh oh, you used the "c" word... - 08/01/2010 07:47:40 PM 941 Views
I hate it when you sound like an actual preacher - 08/01/2010 10:03:28 PM 836 Views
Aw, I liked some of those sentences. - 08/01/2010 11:07:15 PM 777 Views
Isn't that a Bible quote? *NM* - 09/01/2010 12:33:51 AM 434 Views
I guess maybe from an epistle? *NM* - 09/01/2010 02:44:36 AM 415 Views
Yup, Romans 8:31 - 09/01/2010 11:36:46 PM 765 Views
it's not that it was bad - 09/01/2010 01:01:21 AM 887 Views
That seems like a pretty dangerous philosophy. - 09/01/2010 06:24:35 AM 916 Views
Agreed. It also sounds absurd. I have +2 Armor of Christ. How about you? *NM* - 10/01/2010 06:42:24 PM 414 Views
he he *NM* - 11/01/2010 12:20:26 AM 388 Views
Maybe a little. - 11/01/2010 06:06:24 AM 939 Views
I like your philosophy. Thanks for sharing! *NM* - 11/01/2010 03:08:09 PM 386 Views
Ok, so apart from political subtexts, - 07/01/2010 05:40:28 AM 909 Views
You have to admire the world building though - 07/01/2010 07:27:13 AM 767 Views
Both of you are more or less right - 08/01/2010 08:59:34 AM 790 Views
He DID write the original screenplay, I thought? - 08/01/2010 10:04:07 PM 809 Views
And why is it that anyone who can <spoilers!> - 08/01/2010 09:03:45 AM 1047 Views
Exactly! *Same spoilers ^he^ had. - 08/01/2010 04:59:16 PM 858 Views
You're looking at it from the outsider point of view - 08/01/2010 10:12:15 PM 830 Views
I don't buy it. - 09/01/2010 06:29:07 AM 860 Views
Especially with the warrior tribe mentality they all have! - 10/01/2010 08:25:57 PM 719 Views
if there were all these hotshot warriors trying - 11/01/2010 12:22:19 AM 799 Views
Poor scriptwriting *NM* - 11/01/2010 12:56:24 AM 420 Views
oh come on - 11/01/2010 01:00:40 AM 896 Views
Gher's right. It's Plot convinience, with a capital P *NM* - 13/01/2010 09:42:07 PM 399 Views
Re: Exactly! *Same spoilers ^he^ had. - 09/01/2010 01:27:59 PM 1011 Views
It's pretty easy to conquer one of those things - 10/01/2010 08:27:20 PM 1012 Views
Re: It's pretty easy to conquer one of those things - 10/01/2010 08:56:38 PM 793 Views
seriously - 11/01/2010 12:23:58 AM 737 Views

Reply to Message