Because I think it definitely fits the wordings of the various Prophecies and the plot development we saw (e.g. Rand's interactions with Alivia) better. On the other hand, I have no reason to believe that Gawyn will suddenly become crucial in Rand's plotline. I also don't see why Rand's girls would have to bring Rand's corpse to Tar Valon on a boat (besides that the particular Prophecy states that Rand on the boat is dead but alive then). In my view, Rand will simply come to the realisation that he has to fake his death to trick the Shadow, also using the dull dagger, while Logain will seemingly take his place.
As said, the fake death-theory (or at least the idea that it only appears to the world as if the hero died, while he is actually still alive) is also based on myths or other fantasy/science fiction series from which RJ borrowed, like the Greek myths or Dune. IIRC, also the earlier versions of the King Arthur myth said that Arthur was just badly wounded, but actually survived and didn't die. There are also critics of the Bible who argue that Jesus actually didn't die on the cross, but just fell unconscious and was later revived. Rand's "death" could be an example of changing of myths, namely that he actually didn't die, but this resurrection will be the future story.
As said, the fake death-theory (or at least the idea that it only appears to the world as if the hero died, while he is actually still alive) is also based on myths or other fantasy/science fiction series from which RJ borrowed, like the Greek myths or Dune. IIRC, also the earlier versions of the King Arthur myth said that Arthur was just badly wounded, but actually survived and didn't die. There are also critics of the Bible who argue that Jesus actually didn't die on the cross, but just fell unconscious and was later revived. Rand's "death" could be an example of changing of myths, namely that he actually didn't die, but this resurrection will be the future story.
My new 'loony' theory
- 03/05/2010 11:09:52 AM
2654 Views
Hehe, yeah, we can also discuss it here...
- 03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM
1557 Views
- 03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM
1557 Views
Good deal. You're still being prejudiced, though.
- 03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM
1743 Views
- 03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM
1743 Views
Of course, I prefer my theory....
- 03/05/2010 01:01:07 PM
1423 Views
I suppose it's better than Beslan
- 03/05/2010 01:19:52 PM
1656 Views
He, Beslan being Berelain's man in white was a most brilliant theory!
- 03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM
1616 Views
- 03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM
1616 Views
See, this is why I am right and you are wrong!
- 04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM
1431 Views
- 04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM
1431 Views
In my view
- 04/05/2010 10:07:02 AM
1301 Views
Still prejudiced, of course...
- 04/05/2010 10:24:53 AM
1543 Views
Just disagreeing
- 04/05/2010 11:15:44 AM
1414 Views
And repeating yourself. But I have evidence.
- 04/05/2010 12:24:06 PM
1459 Views
Well...
- 04/05/2010 01:10:17 PM
1286 Views
This is getting silly
- 04/05/2010 01:27:56 PM
1250 Views
Yeah, I think as well that we have sufficiently exchanged our views on this matter!
*NM*
- 04/05/2010 02:18:09 PM
666 Views
*NM*
- 04/05/2010 02:18:09 PM
666 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
- 03/05/2010 04:27:12 PM
1507 Views
cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 04:14:18 AM
1526 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 06:43:01 AM
1301 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 07:32:24 AM
1389 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 08:31:47 AM
1510 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 09:27:51 AM
1449 Views
I dont claim to be but didnt you say cool people change the subject line?
- 05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM
1408 Views
- 05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM
1408 Views
Yes. What of it? *NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:22:34 AM
830 Views
now you're a cool kid again?
*NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:23:49 AM
774 Views
*NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:23:49 AM
774 Views
It was originally a comment on those who normally dwell here (and also did at Wotmania of course) *NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:25:17 AM
766 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
- 04/05/2010 04:44:28 AM
1486 Views
what comments by Brandon, and what flaws?
- 04/05/2010 04:49:29 AM
1436 Views
Gawyn promised not to raise a hand against Rand
- 06/05/2010 12:59:47 AM
1195 Views
Indeed he did.
- 06/05/2010 07:23:44 AM
1641 Views
But...
- 06/05/2010 08:52:04 AM
1444 Views
Just because it makes more sense to you doesn't make it more likely. I have evidence!
- 06/05/2010 09:57:52 AM
1276 Views
Well...
- 06/05/2010 11:12:42 AM
1310 Views
*sigh*
- 06/05/2010 01:41:03 PM
1491 Views
I'm still hoping to dissuade you from this crazy idea!
- 06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM
1443 Views
- 06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM
1443 Views
You won't.
- 06/05/2010 02:11:42 PM
1359 Views
Gawyn agreed that he would talk with Elayne about this topic
- 06/05/2010 02:32:55 PM
1490 Views
Nice theory ...
- 07/05/2010 06:25:29 PM
1503 Views
Take two
- 17/05/2010 07:33:35 PM
1293 Views
Re: Take two
- 17/05/2010 11:45:08 PM
1307 Views
Re: Take two
- 18/05/2010 12:52:10 AM
1353 Views
Re: Take two
- 18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM
1509 Views
Re: Take two
- 18/05/2010 01:45:24 AM
1402 Views
