Active Users:411 Time:16/06/2025 05:36:24 PM
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM
I think the mystery has been exacerbated by the way RJ explained things. I've been trying to take his statements and boil them down--i think it may help to understand what he meant if we try to re-word his explanation while preserving his meaning.

I've come to boil it down as follows: By saying it is intuitively obvious, RJ is saying that the answer pops out -- it comes to you -- it is a passive revelation, not a mystery solved.

He shows us how the identity pops out.

He placed one person at the scene of the murder.

If you identify the person who was at the scene you have identified the murder.

He said that we should determine every person's location at the time of the murder.

He told us how to determine everyone's location. We need to determine where the timing of events puts everyone at the time.

So, take the timing of events and map it out. Who is situated at the scene OR consider people moving from point A to point B crossing paths at the time and place.




Reply to message
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM 1860 Views
idle speculation != "Intuitivly obvious" - 22/03/2010 03:01:10 AM 655 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is... - 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM 677 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway? - 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM 757 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo - 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM 538 Views
Fair enough.... - 22/03/2010 06:25:25 PM 780 Views
I think... - 23/03/2010 09:31:41 AM 606 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM 252 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM 468 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM 505 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM 536 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM* - 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM 540 Views
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM 516 Views
As far as I'm concerned... - 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM 527 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer... - 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM 521 Views
Correction... - 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM 471 Views
So, basically... - 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM 507 Views
The clues are there? - 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM 512 Views
Re: The clues are there? - 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM 494 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think. - 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM 546 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh? - 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM 552 Views
Apparently... - 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM 522 Views
No it isn't. - 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM 508 Views
You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM 531 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM 529 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 28/03/2010 08:17:40 PM 500 Views
Yes, it's Winter's Heart. - 29/03/2010 04:01:41 AM 509 Views
Both merged into one being - 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM 541 Views
Not what I asked. - 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM 488 Views
If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM 521 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM 492 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly... - 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM 535 Views
Clearly, one of you has proved that Basel Gill is Demandred *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:12:00 PM 257 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly. - 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM 571 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues... - 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM 502 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence. - 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM 469 Views
Dude - 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM 456 Views
You know what's really embarrassing? - 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM 592 Views
be nice *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:22:03 AM 238 Views
One last time... - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM 506 Views
Re: One last time... - 31/03/2010 06:20:24 PM 510 Views
No... - 31/03/2010 06:31:57 PM 519 Views
Re: No... - 31/03/2010 11:43:42 PM 503 Views
So... - 01/04/2010 10:22:31 AM 488 Views
Re: So... - 01/04/2010 06:41:34 PM 593 Views
Egwene did it though - 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM 505 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't. - 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM 495 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM* - 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 250 Views
But we don't actually see that - 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM 488 Views
Hmm. True, that. - 09/04/2010 07:28:15 PM 443 Views
I see what you are saying now - 09/04/2010 12:08:00 PM 443 Views
Yep - 09/04/2010 07:27:27 PM 466 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM 459 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM 484 Views
First rule of balefire: - 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM 463 Views
Yep, that's my understanding too. - 25/03/2010 07:00:39 PM 493 Views
On the servants theory - 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM 465 Views
Rand's odd wounds - 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM 457 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to? - 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM 545 Views
RJ said that. *NM* - 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM 447 Views
Do you have that quote handy? - 28/03/2010 07:01:06 PM 478 Views
From memory, but can't find the URL - 28/03/2010 08:09:29 PM 455 Views
Here: - 29/03/2010 09:48:36 AM 467 Views
thanks! good job *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:13:12 PM 214 Views
You dont address all the criteria - 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM 461 Views
Did you mean me? *NM* - 31/03/2010 05:54:56 AM 210 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R... - 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM 463 Views
Exactly my point. - 31/03/2010 05:02:41 AM 478 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM 521 Views
Lan can swordfight with his boots? *NM* - 31/03/2010 06:41:53 AM 227 Views
I don't think so... read again *NM* - 31/03/2010 10:54:03 PM 202 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM 485 Views
thanks! but as soon as I posted - 01/04/2010 03:43:59 AM 452 Views
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM 510 Views

Reply to Message