You should consider and address all of RJ's criteria:
IO -- RJ explained what he meant--as per RJ, IO is based upon considering where everyone was, what they were thinking, what they were doing. Emphasis was on where everyone was.
Opportunity--RJ emphasized OPPORTUNITY provided/caused by the TIMING of events. he emphasized this over motive.
How he died AND where he died- Not one or the other, both factors.
Popular ideas between 1998 and 2005 were wrong. This throws out the most widely accepted ideas and suspects. Between 2003 and 2005 only one website got it right and with the correct reasoning; and the site also provided a comprehensive list and analysis.
I'm worried that i missed some of RJ's criteria. Anybody have any more?
i like the way you think so i'd like to see you address each of the above.
Here is the link to find the quotes for the above http://docs.google.com/View?docID=dcjspjqg_820f85qwbd6&revision=_latest
IO -- RJ explained what he meant--as per RJ, IO is based upon considering where everyone was, what they were thinking, what they were doing. Emphasis was on where everyone was.
Opportunity--RJ emphasized OPPORTUNITY provided/caused by the TIMING of events. he emphasized this over motive.
How he died AND where he died- Not one or the other, both factors.
Popular ideas between 1998 and 2005 were wrong. This throws out the most widely accepted ideas and suspects. Between 2003 and 2005 only one website got it right and with the correct reasoning; and the site also provided a comprehensive list and analysis.
I'm worried that i missed some of RJ's criteria. Anybody have any more?
i like the way you think so i'd like to see you address each of the above.
Here is the link to find the quotes for the above http://docs.google.com/View?docID=dcjspjqg_820f85qwbd6&revision=_latest
This message last edited by saidarisnowtainted on 31/03/2010 at 12:12:20 AM
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson
- 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM
2051 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is...
- 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM
877 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway?
- 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM
1000 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo
- 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM
716 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM*
- 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM
356 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM*
- 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM
608 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR.
- 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM
702 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR.
- 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM
736 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM*
- 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM
746 Views
As far as I'm concerned...
- 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM
716 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer...
- 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM
719 Views
Correction...
- 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM
642 Views
So, basically...
- 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM
685 Views
The clues are there?
- 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM
718 Views
Re: The clues are there?
- 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM
686 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think.
- 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM
777 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh?
- 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM
799 Views
Apparently...
- 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM
742 Views
No it isn't.
- 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM
694 Views
You don't understand...
- 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM
726 Views
Re: You don't understand...
- 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM
732 Views
Both merged into one being
- 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM
748 Views
Not what I asked.
- 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM
663 Views
If he couldn't do this...
- 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM
716 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this...
- 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM
674 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly...
- 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM
737 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly.
- 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM
733 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues...
- 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM
690 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence.
- 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM
643 Views
Dude
- 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM
626 Views
You know what's really embarrassing?
- 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM
790 Views
One last time...
- 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM
689 Views
Egwene did it though
- 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM
691 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't.
- 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM
694 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM*
- 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM
350 Views
But we don't actually see that
- 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM
685 Views
But why would he return to his starting point, makes no sense.
- 09/04/2010 12:44:21 PM
770 Views
by your argument Rand should have re-entered the waking world outside to join that battle
- 09/04/2010 07:58:26 PM
711 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants
- 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM
654 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants
- 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM
704 Views
First rule of balefire:
- 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM
665 Views
Re: First rule of balefire: Whatever RJ wants to undo from it is what BF does!
- 28/03/2010 06:59:04 PM
645 Views
On the servants theory
- 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM
651 Views
Rand's odd wounds
- 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM
630 Views
RJ said that special properties of TAR was responsible for the wounds.
- 29/03/2010 09:47:01 AM
634 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to?
- 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM
745 Views
RJ said that. *NM*
- 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM
638 Views
You dont address all the criteria
- 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM
665 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R...
- 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM
673 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes
- 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM
697 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes
- 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM
704 Views


*NM*
*NM*