You should consider and address all of RJ's criteria:
IO -- RJ explained what he meant--as per RJ, IO is based upon considering where everyone was, what they were thinking, what they were doing. Emphasis was on where everyone was.
Opportunity--RJ emphasized OPPORTUNITY provided/caused by the TIMING of events. he emphasized this over motive.
How he died AND where he died- Not one or the other, both factors.
Popular ideas between 1998 and 2005 were wrong. This throws out the most widely accepted ideas and suspects. Between 2003 and 2005 only one website got it right and with the correct reasoning; and the site also provided a comprehensive list and analysis.
I'm worried that i missed some of RJ's criteria. Anybody have any more?
i like the way you think so i'd like to see you address each of the above.
Here is the link to find the quotes for the above http://docs.google.com/View?docID=dcjspjqg_820f85qwbd6&revision=_latest
IO -- RJ explained what he meant--as per RJ, IO is based upon considering where everyone was, what they were thinking, what they were doing. Emphasis was on where everyone was.
Opportunity--RJ emphasized OPPORTUNITY provided/caused by the TIMING of events. he emphasized this over motive.
How he died AND where he died- Not one or the other, both factors.
Popular ideas between 1998 and 2005 were wrong. This throws out the most widely accepted ideas and suspects. Between 2003 and 2005 only one website got it right and with the correct reasoning; and the site also provided a comprehensive list and analysis.
I'm worried that i missed some of RJ's criteria. Anybody have any more?
i like the way you think so i'd like to see you address each of the above.
Here is the link to find the quotes for the above http://docs.google.com/View?docID=dcjspjqg_820f85qwbd6&revision=_latest
This message last edited by saidarisnowtainted on 31/03/2010 at 12:12:20 AM
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson
- 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM
2050 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is...
- 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM
876 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway?
- 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM
998 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo
- 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM
715 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM*
- 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM
354 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM*
- 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM
608 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR.
- 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM
701 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR.
- 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM
736 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM*
- 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM
745 Views
As far as I'm concerned...
- 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM
715 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer...
- 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM
718 Views
Correction...
- 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM
642 Views
So, basically...
- 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM
683 Views
The clues are there?
- 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM
718 Views
Re: The clues are there?
- 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM
685 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think.
- 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM
776 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh?
- 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM
798 Views
Apparently...
- 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM
741 Views
No it isn't.
- 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM
690 Views
You don't understand...
- 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM
725 Views
Re: You don't understand...
- 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM
731 Views
Both merged into one being
- 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM
747 Views
Not what I asked.
- 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM
662 Views
If he couldn't do this...
- 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM
716 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this...
- 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM
673 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly...
- 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM
736 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly.
- 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM
731 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues...
- 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM
689 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence.
- 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM
642 Views
Dude
- 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM
624 Views
You know what's really embarrassing?
- 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM
789 Views
One last time...
- 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM
688 Views
Egwene did it though
- 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM
690 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't.
- 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM
693 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM*
- 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM
349 Views
But we don't actually see that
- 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM
683 Views
But why would he return to his starting point, makes no sense.
- 09/04/2010 12:44:21 PM
769 Views
by your argument Rand should have re-entered the waking world outside to join that battle
- 09/04/2010 07:58:26 PM
710 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants
- 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM
653 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants
- 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM
703 Views
First rule of balefire:
- 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM
664 Views
Re: First rule of balefire: Whatever RJ wants to undo from it is what BF does!
- 28/03/2010 06:59:04 PM
644 Views
On the servants theory
- 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM
650 Views
Rand's odd wounds
- 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM
629 Views
RJ said that special properties of TAR was responsible for the wounds.
- 29/03/2010 09:47:01 AM
633 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to?
- 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM
744 Views
RJ said that. *NM*
- 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM
637 Views
You dont address all the criteria
- 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM
664 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R...
- 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM
672 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes
- 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM
696 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes
- 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM
703 Views


*NM*
*NM*