Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson
saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM
I think the mystery has been exacerbated by the way RJ explained things. I've been trying to take his statements and boil them down--i think it may help to understand what he meant if we try to re-word his explanation while preserving his meaning.
I've come to boil it down as follows: By saying it is intuitively obvious, RJ is saying that the answer pops out -- it comes to you -- it is a passive revelation, not a mystery solved.
He shows us how the identity pops out.
He placed one person at the scene of the murder.
If you identify the person who was at the scene you have identified the murder.
He said that we should determine every person's location at the time of the murder.
He told us how to determine everyone's location. We need to determine where the timing of events puts everyone at the time.
So, take the timing of events and map it out. Who is situated at the scene OR consider people moving from point A to point B crossing paths at the time and place.
I've come to boil it down as follows: By saying it is intuitively obvious, RJ is saying that the answer pops out -- it comes to you -- it is a passive revelation, not a mystery solved.
He shows us how the identity pops out.
He placed one person at the scene of the murder.
If you identify the person who was at the scene you have identified the murder.
He said that we should determine every person's location at the time of the murder.
He told us how to determine everyone's location. We need to determine where the timing of events puts everyone at the time.
So, take the timing of events and map it out. Who is situated at the scene OR consider people moving from point A to point B crossing paths at the time and place.
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson
- 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM
2012 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is...
- 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM
839 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway?
- 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM
958 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo
- 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM
670 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM*
- 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM
323 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM*
- 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM
587 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR.
- 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM
651 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR.
- 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM
681 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM*
- 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM
709 Views
As far as I'm concerned...
- 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM
671 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer...
- 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM
672 Views
Correction...
- 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM
609 Views
So, basically...
- 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM
643 Views
The clues are there?
- 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM
669 Views
Re: The clues are there?
- 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM
658 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think.
- 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM
722 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh?
- 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM
749 Views
Apparently...
- 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM
689 Views
No it isn't.
- 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM
639 Views
You don't understand...
- 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM
679 Views
Re: You don't understand...
- 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM
693 Views
Both merged into one being
- 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM
690 Views
Not what I asked.
- 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM
627 Views
If he couldn't do this...
- 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM
661 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this...
- 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM
632 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly...
- 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM
685 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly.
- 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM
698 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues...
- 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM
647 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence.
- 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM
607 Views
Dude
- 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM
577 Views
You know what's really embarrassing?
- 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM
738 Views
One last time...
- 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM
654 Views
Egwene did it though
- 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM
642 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't.
- 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM
648 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM*
- 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM
319 Views
But we don't actually see that
- 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM
642 Views
But why would he return to his starting point, makes no sense.
- 09/04/2010 12:44:21 PM
726 Views
by your argument Rand should have re-entered the waking world outside to join that battle
- 09/04/2010 07:58:26 PM
665 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants
- 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM
618 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants
- 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM
656 Views
First rule of balefire:
- 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM
621 Views
Re: First rule of balefire: Whatever RJ wants to undo from it is what BF does!
- 28/03/2010 06:59:04 PM
608 Views
On the servants theory
- 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM
595 Views
Rand's odd wounds
- 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM
595 Views
RJ said that special properties of TAR was responsible for the wounds.
- 29/03/2010 09:47:01 AM
595 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to?
- 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM
697 Views
RJ said that. *NM*
- 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM
585 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R...
- 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM
618 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes
- 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM
651 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes
- 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM
646 Views
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson
- 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM
667 Views


*NM*
*NM*