Active Users:2106 Time:17/06/2026 05:00:37 PM
Yeah right... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 27/05/2010 08:35:35 PM

Actually we don't know if the killer didn't spy on Asmo before, like Rand could watch him from another place in the palace.

That is irrelevant. Since Asmo himself decided to enter the pantry a few seconds before he did, there is no way someone watching him could have figured out his location and beaten him to it.

In the context RJ used it, it most likely simply means that Asmo became irrelevant for the story and therefore had to die.

That is not the meaning of roadkill at all. Spinning words to make it fit your theory is a classic sign that you care about your version more than the authors.

It means that the killer had a general motive to kill Asmo, but only because of the right opportunity did it happen.

Exactly. But you're saying the killer worked to create that opportunity by closely following Asmo's movements and somehow divining his destination before he knew of it himself. That is not a crime of opportunity. That's called stalking your prey before offing him, and that doesn't depend on chance at all.

That the killer was simply in the room, where Asmo entered, doesn't explain at all why we should focus on timing.

Why? It shows something important. Whoever the killer was, she/he was in an area where excessive Balefire was used some time ago. Meaning said person almost certainly came there after Rand followed Rahvin into TAR. There's the issue of timing, and it in no way precludes a person hiding there chancing upon Asmo and killing him.
If Asmo hadn't opened the door, the killer had probably tried again sometime later, if there is another good opportunity.

That implies a deliberate intent to kill Asmo being the sole purpose of the killer's presence in Caemlyn, which doesn't fit at all with RJ's statement that this was a murder of opportunity.

RJ clearly says that a non-channeler had succeeded in killing Asmo. This refutes the idea that only a channeler could have killed him.

First off, where was this idea from?
Secondly, Padan Fain can do it does not mean any mortal can do it. He's got Mordeth in him, and has any number of powers that people like Slayer simply do not posses.
This message last edited by fionwe1987 on 27/05/2010 at 08:35:58 PM
Reply to message
An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds - 27/05/2010 12:12:50 PM 2827 Views
I hate to say it, as I love this mystery.... - 27/05/2010 03:01:08 PM 1512 Views
Surely, there can never be enough Asmo threads! *NM* - 27/05/2010 04:18:06 PM 814 Views
I have a theory on the killer that doesn't involve Slayer... - 28/05/2010 03:41:23 AM 1318 Views
It's not really obvious... - 28/05/2010 09:08:27 AM 1252 Views
In addition to Etzel's comments - 28/05/2010 09:08:45 PM 1194 Views
Far-fetched, IMO - 27/05/2010 04:01:05 PM 1622 Views
very well said *NM* - 27/05/2010 04:19:10 PM 845 Views
I don't want Slayer to be the killer - 27/05/2010 04:33:06 PM 1330 Views
The way you twist things, it certainly seems so! - 27/05/2010 05:07:22 PM 1424 Views
Bah, hogwash! - 27/05/2010 05:17:37 PM 1273 Views
Re: Bah, hogwash! - 27/05/2010 08:14:16 PM 1302 Views
The point is... - 28/05/2010 08:38:49 AM 1364 Views
Yes, but Fain is a far cry from your average non-channeler - 28/05/2010 12:01:44 PM 1404 Views
As is Slayer - 28/05/2010 12:25:07 PM 1292 Views
There is no evidence of this at all - 28/05/2010 12:32:37 PM 1229 Views
Yeah, the evil guys don't manage to harm the good guys - 28/05/2010 12:38:57 PM 1211 Views
so far we've seen Slayer kill a sleeping guy and his wife - 28/05/2010 12:45:14 PM 1250 Views
I disagree. *NM* - 28/05/2010 12:50:02 PM 1357 Views
You always twist the quotes to make them say what Jordan didn't intend to say.... - 28/05/2010 02:20:09 PM 1308 Views
I think this is your interpretation - 28/05/2010 02:50:14 PM 1244 Views
Yeah right... - 27/05/2010 08:35:35 PM 1362 Views
See my replies above. *NM* - 28/05/2010 08:40:42 AM 1149 Views
Re: Bah, hogwash! - 28/05/2010 08:28:16 AM 1137 Views
See my repy to DomA. *NM* - 28/05/2010 08:39:15 AM 1117 Views
None of this explains how Slayer had opportunity that others didn't - 27/05/2010 05:12:48 PM 1459 Views
We often see... - 27/05/2010 05:33:19 PM 1308 Views
I just keep coming back to Slayer needs wild explanations while Graendal is more obvious - 27/05/2010 05:52:13 PM 1397 Views
Ok, as we said in the other thread, let's RAFO! *NM* - 27/05/2010 05:57:49 PM 1396 Views
Agreed *NM* - 27/05/2010 06:03:51 PM 760 Views
Indeed - 28/05/2010 08:39:14 AM 1254 Views
Well... - 28/05/2010 10:19:46 AM 1320 Views
Re: Well... - 28/05/2010 12:20:15 PM 1321 Views
I adressed the points regarding the Fain-comparsion above - 28/05/2010 12:35:08 PM 1233 Views
your Slayer theory is ridiculously complex! - 28/05/2010 12:37:08 PM 1297 Views
It just requires to combine some clues from the first 5 books & some common sense - 28/05/2010 12:44:10 PM 1259 Views
common sense? - 28/05/2010 12:51:25 PM 1254 Views
See my posts above. *NM* - 28/05/2010 02:50:56 PM 1270 Views
Re: Well... - 28/05/2010 02:27:40 PM 1427 Views
No... - 28/05/2010 03:04:41 PM 1309 Views
let's try this another way - 28/05/2010 03:14:07 PM 1311 Views
The main problem with Graendal is... - 28/05/2010 05:31:09 PM 1230 Views
Graendal has a pretty significant role in TFoH - 28/05/2010 06:54:39 PM 1334 Views
Re: The main problem with Graendal is... - 28/05/2010 09:20:27 PM 1380 Views
my first thought was it was Sammael or Graendal. Come LoC it was clear to me that it was Graendal. - 28/05/2010 09:44:38 PM 1460 Views
RJ used the expression... - 29/05/2010 08:17:08 AM 1229 Views
be careful ... your stretching far enough you might hurt yourself - 29/05/2010 01:12:29 PM 1359 Views
Re: No... - 28/05/2010 03:38:49 PM 1217 Views
Re: I don't want Slayer to be the killer - 27/05/2010 07:47:40 PM 1302 Views
Couple of questions - 27/05/2010 09:53:05 PM 1321 Views
Be'lal managed to get out NO! - 27/05/2010 10:08:33 PM 1157 Views
Hmmm - 27/05/2010 10:27:55 PM 1281 Views
Re: Hmmm - 27/05/2010 10:34:30 PM 1144 Views
I don't think you can actually cut BF weaves - 27/05/2010 10:45:34 PM 1184 Views
Hmmm I wonder about that. - 27/05/2010 10:58:46 PM 1251 Views
I think it would be impossible for someone to react that quickly - 27/05/2010 11:13:01 PM 1342 Views
We've seen it done. - 28/05/2010 06:32:08 PM 1185 Views
Not the same thing - 28/05/2010 07:00:13 PM 1194 Views
Re: Couple of questions - 28/05/2010 03:29:29 PM 1342 Views
As said... - 28/05/2010 08:36:28 AM 1273 Views
Of course you do. Trying to deny it is just silly. Everyone knows your bias. *NM* - 27/05/2010 08:43:18 PM 653 Views
No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too - 27/05/2010 09:08:48 PM 1299 Views
Re: No, seriously, if actually Graendal did it, it's ok to me, too - 28/05/2010 08:25:46 AM 1280 Views
But look... - 28/05/2010 09:01:12 AM 1292 Views
if there are clues in TFoH I find it hard to believe that Slayer is involved - 28/05/2010 12:29:40 PM 1209 Views
The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course - 28/05/2010 12:32:13 PM 1261 Views
Re: The scene of Asmo's murder contains clues, of course - 28/05/2010 12:35:22 PM 1288 Views
RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM* - 28/05/2010 12:40:23 PM 1323 Views
Re: RJ said the main clues are in the books before LoC. *NM* - 28/05/2010 12:52:30 PM 1189 Views
Yeah, I know. *NM* - 28/05/2010 02:51:32 PM 1261 Views
??? - 28/05/2010 02:19:17 PM 1229 Views
Of course RJ implied that. You should read his quotes about Asmo! *NM* - 28/05/2010 02:52:32 PM 1268 Views
Here is what RJ said EDIT - 28/05/2010 03:29:19 PM 1039 Views
Indeed - 28/05/2010 05:18:35 PM 1181 Views
Re: Indeed - 28/05/2010 05:26:38 PM 1180 Views
LOL!! - 28/05/2010 03:29:35 PM 996 Views
Too much? - 28/05/2010 05:16:44 PM 1258 Views
Re: Far-fetched, IMO - 02/06/2010 07:34:58 PM 1373 Views
Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot? *NM* - 02/06/2010 11:13:04 PM 775 Views
Re: Sent by whom? And how on earth would he be expected to interrupt a Forsaken plot? - 19/06/2010 12:59:54 AM 1070 Views
Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken - 19/06/2010 03:30:37 AM 1280 Views
Re: Slayer takes orders from the Forsaken - 24/06/2010 09:03:18 AM 1501 Views
The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book - 26/06/2010 02:32:26 PM 995 Views
Re: The orders to not kill Rand didn't happen until the next book - 01/07/2010 10:13:53 PM 1415 Views
Re: An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds - 27/05/2010 06:19:18 PM 1207 Views
Re: An analysis of Asmodean's last seconds - 27/05/2010 09:16:21 PM 1210 Views
Lanfear killed Asmo..... - 28/05/2010 05:05:55 AM 1186 Views
Doesn't make sense - 28/05/2010 11:09:14 AM 1228 Views
Sorry, Lanfear did it..... - 29/05/2010 03:47:44 AM 1132 Views
Death is Moridin "when death took him"; need I say more *NM* - 28/05/2010 10:07:14 AM 785 Views
There is a quote that refutes this... - 28/05/2010 10:22:12 AM 1261 Views
I think I found an RJ quote that kills the Slayer theory - 29/05/2010 01:57:20 PM 1215 Views
If Slayer is actually the killer... - 29/05/2010 02:20:32 PM 1247 Views
Please, RJ would do as he always had and immediately RAFOd a question like that - 29/05/2010 02:26:10 PM 1213 Views
Well, I don't think so. - 29/05/2010 02:43:28 PM 1230 Views
yet he never gave an answer like this one - 29/05/2010 02:57:35 PM 1290 Views
Again... - 29/05/2010 03:09:06 PM 1306 Views
Taking things NO - 29/05/2010 03:12:24 PM 1265 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer. - 06/06/2010 05:44:05 AM 1096 Views
If Slayer never met Asmo in the books he could not have killed him - 06/06/2010 12:46:40 PM 1093 Views
But Slayer could have met Asmo, when he was killed.. *NM* - 06/06/2010 01:06:01 PM 1163 Views
Directly contradicts what RJ said "they did not meet in the books" - 06/06/2010 02:51:50 PM 1139 Views
Not "before" the murder. *NM* - 06/06/2010 06:03:34 PM 1148 Views
Re: Not "before" the murder. *NM* - 06/06/2010 10:25:16 PM 1105 Views
He answers the question, if they met "before" the murder. *NM* - 07/06/2010 07:18:50 AM 759 Views
not if it didn't happen in the books - 07/06/2010 12:08:34 PM 1057 Views
I'm relieved then... - 07/06/2010 12:13:58 PM 1063 Views
it's nearly as simplistic as knowing Graendal did it - 07/06/2010 12:48:42 PM 1197 Views
Compilation of the clues I could find on Slayer and Graendal - 29/05/2010 04:26:58 PM 1383 Views
I think Asmo's killer was as surprised as he. - 29/05/2010 09:26:03 PM 1226 Views
That's what I've always thought as well. - 29/05/2010 10:06:56 PM 1159 Views
That's always been my theory too - 29/05/2010 10:18:30 PM 1259 Views
*nods* - 29/05/2010 11:23:18 PM 1264 Views
Re: That's always been my theory too - 30/05/2010 07:35:50 AM 1178 Views
You know, there's no direct proof suggesting that Asmo's killer was "surprised"..... - 01/06/2010 04:04:56 AM 1151 Views
That's why I said "I think" and offered my opinion. - 01/06/2010 09:46:09 PM 1189 Views
except the Author said it was a murder of opportunity - 01/06/2010 11:13:14 PM 1175 Views
That is simply false. - 02/06/2010 10:00:27 AM 1247 Views
RJ stated it was a murder of opportunity ... I never said "only" - 02/06/2010 11:49:23 AM 1316 Views
Of course, it is false - 02/06/2010 12:13:11 PM 1230 Views
Here are the quotes - 02/06/2010 12:39:29 PM 1162 Views
As said, those quotes simply don't support that the murder was basically just an unplanned accident. *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:14:29 PM 759 Views
I disagree. It's pretty much black and white that the opportunity/timing is the key factor to - 02/06/2010 02:39:03 PM 1087 Views
Actually I like it because it fits Slayer better than Graendal, as pointed out. *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:51:24 PM 631 Views
that makes no sense at all *NM* - 02/06/2010 02:53:28 PM 815 Views
RJ pretty much said it wasn't Slayer. - 06/06/2010 05:47:13 AM 1223 Views
Well... - 06/06/2010 10:46:13 AM 1207 Views
Logic - 06/06/2010 02:53:27 PM 1175 Views
You're falling into Etzelian logic there... - 06/06/2010 03:25:30 PM 1175 Views
I'm just being a smartass *NM* - 06/06/2010 03:36:00 PM 791 Views
It's good that Etzel sticks to his guns - 06/06/2010 04:42:01 PM 1282 Views
OMG, Taim and Mesaana were getting it on in the pantry - 06/06/2010 09:49:57 PM 1161 Views
That reminds me... - 19/06/2010 04:46:58 AM 1181 Views
That's not anyone's logic, this argument is simply utter nonsense. *NM* - 07/06/2010 12:08:05 PM 1215 Views
just like thinking Slayer was the killer is - 07/06/2010 12:09:34 PM 1170 Views
Yeah... - 07/06/2010 12:21:31 PM 1276 Views
thinking the top assassin killed someone when it's been stated over and over - 07/06/2010 12:56:48 PM 1220 Views
Those quotes pretty much show that Graendal is careful... *NM* - 07/06/2010 01:03:26 PM 1414 Views
No they show that she is deliberate! - 07/06/2010 01:12:29 PM 1252 Views
That are just semantics - 07/06/2010 01:36:12 PM 1314 Views
and you think it's obvious that Slayer was the premier Shadow assassin prior to WH? - 07/06/2010 02:06:47 PM 1189 Views
As I explained you several times, I can see why RJ thought it is obvious, yes... - 07/06/2010 02:17:01 PM 1185 Views
Why wouldn't Graendal head to Caemlyn at that point? - 07/06/2010 02:36:24 PM 1244 Views
And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin? - 07/06/2010 02:54:33 PM 1288 Views
Re: And where was she then, when Rand attacked Rahvin? - 07/06/2010 03:01:14 PM 1253 Views
You should re-read the scene where Moghedien tells Nynaeve about it... - 07/06/2010 03:12:55 PM 1321 Views
That's a different thing than Moghedien saying the plan was canceled - 07/06/2010 03:15:32 PM 1335 Views
That is essentially what Moghedien said. - 07/06/2010 03:33:35 PM 1078 Views
um no it's not - 07/06/2010 04:17:04 PM 1167 Views
It's told after that... - 07/06/2010 04:46:31 PM 1134 Views
No it doesn't. It tells us that Rahvin, just like all the others had a side plan in place - 07/06/2010 04:55:43 PM 1282 Views
Yeah... - 07/06/2010 05:17:59 PM 1207 Views
Funny I feel the same way you do ... - 07/06/2010 05:25:48 PM 1215 Views
Ah, whatever... - 07/06/2010 05:35:22 PM 1148 Views
We are on the exact same page - 07/06/2010 05:42:48 PM 1181 Views
Re: We are on the exact same page - 07/06/2010 05:52:37 PM 1282 Views
LMAO - 07/06/2010 06:07:16 PM 1630 Views
I promised Etzel long ago... - 19/06/2010 04:49:11 AM 1190 Views

Reply to Message